BLS LLB 5 Years Sem 5 Torts 2025-26 60/40 Question Paper - Mumbai University | munotes
MU law student group
Free to join
This paper is solved: read the model answers.
Loading PDF...
Older exam
2025-26 - 75/25
Semester-end · Torts
→
Newer exam
None yet: this is the latest
New papers land after each exam season.
Questions asked in this paper
Solved paper All 22 questions answered in full Exam-ready answers, the reasoning behind each one, and what the examiner is looking for. Open the solutionsSECTION I - Answer any six in two sentences 12 Marks
-
Q1 Define tort.Read the model answer
-
Q2 Explain any two difference between tort and crimeRead the model answer
-
Q3 What is assault?Read the model answer
-
Q4 Explain joint tort-feasors.Read the model answer
-
Q5 Explain the master and servant under the vicarious liability.Read the model answer
-
Q6 Define the complaint under Consumer Protection Act.Read the model answer
-
Q7 What is deficiency in service?Read the model answer
-
Q8 Explain nervous shock.Read the model answer
-
Q9 Explain the principle involved in Wagon Mound case.Read the model answer
-
Q10 What is accord and satisfaction?Read the model answer
SECTION II - Short notes on any two 12 Marks
-
Q11 Rights of the ConsumerRead the model answer
-
Q12 Damnum sine injuriaRead the model answer
-
Q13 Trespass ab initioRead the model answer
-
Q14 Ryland v. FletcherRead the model answer
SECTION III - Answer any two situational based questions 12 Marks
-
Q15 Mr. Rajesh underwent an eye surgery free of cost at a charitable medical camp organized by Swasthya Seva Trust. After the operation, he lost vision in one eye due to alleged negligence by Dr. Sharma, the attending ophthalmologist.
- (a) Whether Mr. Rajesh can file case against Dr. Sharma and the charitable trust? Explain.
- (b) Whether Consumer case can be possible if no fee charged from Mr. Rajesh? Explain.
-
Q16 Mr. Arjun, a paying spectator at the Wankhede Stadium, was struck by a cricket ball that flew into the stands after a fielder's misjudged catch during a professional match organized by the Mumbai Cricket Club (MCC). He sustained severe head injuries and seeks damages from the MCC for negligence in ensuring spectator safety.
- (a) Whether Mr. Arjun's claim sustain in the court? Explain the principle involved.
- (b) State the defences available to MCC.
-
Q17 Mr. Khan owned a dog known to exhibit aggressive tendencies. Despite prior complaints from neighbors, he continued to keep the dog without adequate restraint. One morning, the dog escaped from his compound and bit Ms. Nilofer, a passerby, causing serious injury.
- (a) Whether Mr. Khan is liable in tort? Explain the involved principle of tort.
- (b) Explain the defences available to Mr. Khan.
-
Q18 Mr. Kamaljeet Kale opened KK School near Sunrise Academy, an existing school in the same area. Many students shifted to KK School, causing financial loss to Sunrise Academy.
- (a) Can Sunrise Academy sue KK School in tort for the loss suffered? Explain.
- (b) Which principle of tort involved in this case? Explain.
SECTION IV - Answer any two in details 24 Marks
-
Q19 Explain the general defences in tort.Read the model answer
-
Q20 Explain the essentials of false imprisonment.Read the model answer
-
Q21 Discuss the judicial and extra-judicial remedies.Read the model answer
-
Q22 Define three-tier system under the Consumer Protection Act.Read the model answer
Read from the scan above, so a character or two may differ. The scan is the original.
Something wrong on this page? Report it and we will check it against the scan.
Quick Help
No. The full paper opens straight away, with no login and nothing to pay.
Related Resources
Something wrong with this paper? Report it.
Connected Papers
BLS LLB 5 Years / Sem 5 · 61 papers
Questions? Email contact@munotes.in
Done!