Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Resource Management and The Law
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 6 Environment and Legal Order
2022 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
LLM Group 6 Environment and Legal Order Resource Management and The Law 2022 Question Paper with Solutions
Get access to whole semester resourcesSemester Pass
MU LLM student group
Free to join
First published on munotes.in on 14 September 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2022 examination.
The law in these answers is stated as at September 2026, and five developments date most textbooks on this subject. The SHANTI Act, 2025 received assent on 20 December 2025 and repeals the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010 when it commences, which had not happened by mid-September 2026. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 replaced the Mines Act, 1952 on 21 November 2025. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 has been the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam since its 2023 amendment. On 29 July 2026 the Supreme Court held in Vanashakti v. Union of India that prior environmental clearance is mandatory and that only a narrow, time-bound scheme made by notification can cure a project begun without it. And the Plachimada ruling that ground water is held in public trust was reversed in part by a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on 7 April 2005.
Contents
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2022 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
The Paper as Set
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2022 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 7 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
- N.B: 1. Attempt Any Four Questions; 2. Do not identify yourself in any form and anywhere on your Answer sheets by means of writings, remarks, signs etc. as it shall be considered as a mean of unfair practice; 3. Use citations / case laws references / illustrations / examples wherever asked for and / or required.
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
1.'India is a culturally rich Nation'. Analyse the ways and means in which our State safeguards the culture and heritage of our country by passing of various Statutes, acts of conversation, signing of treaties, passing of relevant judicial judgments.[25]
Also, elaborate on the ways and processes that can be adopted by the State to ensure that our rich culture, natural heritage, historical monuments and other legacies of the past continue to remain safe and strong.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the question sets its own structure and the examiner will mark against it. Part one asks how the State safeguards culture and heritage through four means: statutes, acts of conservation, treaties, and judgments. Take them in that order, with section numbers, programmes, conventions and cases. Part two asks what more the State can do for culture, natural heritage, monuments and other legacies, which needs concrete processes tied to the weaknesses part one exposes. Cover movable and intangible heritage as well as monuments, and natural as well as cultural heritage, because the question names all of them.
India's heritage and the constitutional duty to protect it
India's heritage runs from prehistoric sites to colonial buildings, from manuscripts and bronzes to living traditions, and from sacred groves to Himalayan parks. The Archaeological Survey of India had 3,698 centrally protected monuments and sites in December 2024, and India had 45 World Heritage properties after "Ancient Buddhist Site, Sarnath" was inscribed at the World Heritage Committee's 48th session in July 2026.
The Constitution frames the State's role. Article 49 obliges the State to protect every monument, place or object of artistic or historic interest declared by or under law made by Parliament to be of national importance from spoliation, disfigurement, destruction, removal, disposal or export. Article 51A(f) makes it every citizen's duty to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture, and Articles 48A and 51A(g) do the same for the natural environment. Legislative power is divided: monuments and sites of national importance are Entry 67 of List I, other monuments Entry 12 of List II, and other archaeological sites Entry 40 of List III.
Means one: statutes
The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 is the principal law for immovable heritage. An ancient monument is a structure of historical, archaeological or artistic interest at least a hundred years old (section 2(a)). The Central Government declares monuments and sites of national importance on two months' notice (section 4), may acquire rights or become guardian (section 5), enter maintenance agreements (section 6), or acquire a monument in danger (section 13). The public has a right of access (section 18), and customary religious use is saved.
The 2010 amendment created the modern protective ring: a prohibited area of 100 metres around every protected monument, in which no construction may be permitted (section 20A), a regulated area of a further 200 metres, in which construction needs permission (section 20B), heritage bye-laws for each monument (section 20E), and a National Monuments Authority (sections 20F onward). Construction in either area without or against permission is punishable with two years' imprisonment, a fine of one lakh rupees, or both (sections 30A and 30B).
The Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972 protects movable heritage. Only the Central Government or its authorised agency may export an antiquity (section 3); dealing requires a licence (section 5); notified antiquities must be registered (section 14); objects may be compulsorily acquired for public display (section 19); and unlawful export carries imprisonment of six months to three years and fine (section 25).
Natural heritage has its own statutes. The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 creates sanctuaries, national parks, conservation and community reserves and tiger reserves; the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 allows States to notify biodiversity heritage sites under section 37, as amended in 2023, on the recommendation of the State Biodiversity Board, which must first consult the local body and the Biodiversity Management Committee; and the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017 protect notified and Ramsar wetlands. State legislatures protect monuments of State importance under their own laws.
Means two: acts of conservation
The State does not only legislate; it conserves. The Archaeological Survey of India maintains and restores the monuments under the Central Act, State archaeology departments do the same for State monuments, and museums and archives preserve movable heritage. Under the 1958 Act the Central Government must classify protected monuments by their value on the Authority's recommendation (section 4A), survey every prohibited and regulated area to prepare site plans (section 35A), and identify all constructions made around monuments since 16 June 1992 (section 35B).
The State also removes protection where it has lost its object. The Government told the Lok Sabha in July 2024 that 18 monuments had been delisted as having ceased to be of national importance, including a memorial to John Nicholson in Delhi and two Kos Minars in Haryana, and in December 2022 it had informed a Parliamentary Standing Committee that 50 of 3,693 protected monuments could not be traced. Those figures are themselves an audit of conservation.
For nature, conservation is carried out through protected area management, wetland management plans under rule 5 of the 2017 Rules, and restoration, of which Chilika's removal from the Ramsar Convention's Montreux Record in 2002 is the standing example.
Means three: treaties
India is a party to the principal international heritage instruments.
| Treaty | What it obliges |
|---|---|
| World Heritage Convention, 1972 (ratified 14 November 1977) | Identification, protection, conservation, presentation and transmission of cultural and natural heritage of outstanding universal value, a duty resting primarily on the State (Article 4) |
| Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 2003 (ratified 9 September 2005) | Inventories and safeguarding of living traditions, practices and knowledge |
| UNESCO Convention of 1970 on illicit trafficking of cultural property | Prevention of illicit export and co-operation in return of stolen objects |
| Treaty | What it obliges |
|---|---|
| Hague Convention, 1954 | Protection of cultural property in armed conflict |
| Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, 1971 | Conservation and wise use of wetlands |
India has also used the treaty system actively: it hosted the 46th session of the World Heritage Committee in New Delhi in July 2024 and the 20th session of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Committee at the Red Fort in December 2025. The treaties operate in India through domestic law, since the World Heritage Convention has no enacting statute; the 1958 and 1972 Acts and the environmental statutes carry its obligations.
Means four: judicial judgments
Protecting a monument by regulating a region. In M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, (1997) 2 SCC 353, the Taj Trapezium case decided on 30 December 1996, the facts were that sulphur dioxide from foundries, chemical industries, the Mathura refinery and the Ferozabad glass industry was producing acid rain that yellowed and corroded the marble of the Taj Mahal. Held. Applying the precautionary principle, the Supreme Court directed the 292 industries in the Taj Trapezium Zone to switch to natural gas or relocate, and to stop using coke or coal if they did neither, with protection for workers. Why it bears. A World Heritage monument was saved by environmental law applied to its surroundings.
Refusing to let the Government commercialise a monument. In Rajeev Mankotia v. Secretary to the President of India, (1997) 10 SCC 441, the Union Cabinet had decided to convert the Viceregal Lodge at Shimla into a five-star hotel. The Court treated the building as a monument of national importance that the Union was bound to preserve under the 1958 Act, and on its direction the entire area of the Lodge was notified as a protected monument. Why it bears. Heritage belongs to the nation, and even the Government that owns a monument cannot put its commercial value above the duty to protect it.
Enforcing the protective ring strictly. In Archaeological Survey of India v. Narender Anand, (2012) 2 SCC 562, a multi-storeyed building was being raised on Janpath Lane within 100 metres of Jantar Mantar. The Supreme Court held that the High Court could not direct review of the 1992 prohibition "in the name of development", noted that some of the observatory's instruments had become non-functional largely because of tall buildings around it, and held that exceptions for public works cannot be used to permit private construction. Why it bears. The prohibited and regulated areas around a monument protect its setting, and the courts enforce them strictly against development pressure.
Restoring public heritage space. In M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd v. Radhey Shyam Sahu, (1999) 6 SCC 464, the Lucknow Nagar Mahapalika had allowed a builder to construct an underground shopping complex beneath the historic Jhandewala Park in Aminabad. Held. The Mahapalika was a trustee of the park under the public trust doctrine; the agreement was arbitrary and in breach of trust. Three of the complex's four blocks were to be demolished by the Mahapalika at its own cost and the park restored within twelve months, the remaining block becoming a parking lot, and the builder was divested of all rights in the structure without any claim against the Mahapalika. Why it bears. Courts will reverse, not merely stop, damage to heritage spaces.
Cultural rights of communities. In Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd v. Ministry of Environment and Forest, (2013) 6 SCC 476, the Court left it to the Gram Sabhas of the Dongaria Kondh to decide whether bauxite mining would affect their religious and cultural rights, including their right to worship Niyam Raja on the Niyamgiri hills, recognising a living sacred landscape as heritage.
Where the present safeguards fall short
Protection depends on declaration. The 1958 Act protects only what has been declared of national importance, so a significant building that has not been notified, or is less than a hundred years old, has no central protection at all.
The protective ring is uniform and rigid. A flat hundred metre prohibition applies to a World Heritage monument and to a small wayside structure alike, and since 2010 no construction may be permitted in a prohibited area, only the repair or renovation, with permission, of buildings that existed before 16 June 1992 or were later approved (sections 20A(4) and 20C), which bears hard on residents of old cities while unauthorised construction continues where enforcement is weak.
Much of the 2010 machinery is incomplete. Heritage bye-laws, classification and site surveys are the tools that make the ring workable, and until they exist every application becomes a separate dispute.
Penalties are modest at two years or one lakh rupees for construction in a prohibited area, against the value of urban land.
Intangible heritage has no statute, and the World Heritage Convention has never been enacted, so India's international obligations are carried only indirectly by laws written for other purposes.
Part two: ways and processes to keep heritage safe and strong
1. Complete the unfinished statutory work. Classify monuments under section 4A, finish the site surveys under section 35A, and notify heritage bye-laws under section 20E for every monument, so that owners and builders know exactly what is allowed.
2. Locate and document every protected object. A national geo-tagged register of monuments and antiquities, with periodic physical verification, would prevent the loss revealed by the untraceable monuments reported to Parliament.
3. Heritage impact assessment. Require an assessment of effects on heritage before major infrastructure near monuments and World Heritage properties, alongside environmental impact assessment.
4. Bring communities in. Owners, worshippers, residents and local bodies should share management through agreements and incentives, since a living monument survives best when it has a function in the community.
5. Protect modern, vernacular and intangible heritage. The hundred-year threshold leaves out twentieth-century architecture, and there is no general statute for intangible heritage despite the 2003 Convention; both need legal recognition.
6. Fight trafficking and pursue repatriation. Strengthen registration under the 1972 Act, customs checks and co-operation under the 1970 Convention.
7. Integrate natural heritage. Notify more biodiversity heritage sites and wetlands, protect sacred groves and cultural landscapes, and plan monuments and their natural settings together, as the Taj Trapezium case did.
8. Fund maintenance and train conservators, and regulate tourism to carrying capacity, so that visitors support rather than wear away heritage.
9. Adapt to climate change, which threatens coastal forts, earthen structures and wetlands through floods, heat and sea level rise.
Conclusion. The State safeguards India's heritage through a layered system: statutes such as the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 with its 2010 prohibited and regulated areas, the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972, and the wildlife, biodiversity and wetland laws; conservation by the Archaeological Survey and State bodies; treaties including the World Heritage Convention, ratified in 1977, and the 2003 Intangible Heritage Convention; and judgments such as the Taj Trapezium case, Rajeev Mankotia, Narender Anand and M.I. Builders. The system is strong in principle but incomplete in execution, as missing monuments and unfinished bye-laws show. Keeping heritage safe and strong requires completing the statutory machinery, documenting and monitoring every asset, assessing development for heritage impact, involving communities, extending protection to modern and intangible heritage, and treating cultural and natural heritage as one inheritance.
The rest of the answers
The first answer is free. The rest come with the LL.M. Environment and Legal Order Semester 1 solved papers.
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.