Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Prevention and Control of Pollution
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 6 Environment and Legal Order
2025-26 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Prevention and Control of Pollution
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 6 Environment and Legal Order
2025-26 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 14 September 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2025-26 examination.
The law in these answers is stated as at September 2026, and five changes date most textbooks on this subject. Since 1 April 2024 most contraventions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 attract penalties imposed by an adjudicating officer, appealable to the National Green Tribunal, instead of prosecution. The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Amendment Act, 2024 makes that change only in Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, the Union territories and the States that adopt it. The Indian Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure were replaced on 1 July 2024, so public nuisance is now section 270 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the magistrate's order to remove it section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026 replaced the Rules of 2016 from 1 April 2026. And the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 is stated as amended in 2022, with four Schedules in place of six.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2025-26 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2025-26 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 7 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the question has three limbs and the marks are spread across all of them. Define the term properly, which means quoting the three statutory definitions and showing the elements they share, not offering a dictionary line. Classify the kinds by the medium that receives the pollutant and name the law that governs each. Then take the effects on the environment medium by medium, with at least three decided cases in which a court found those effects as facts. Close on where the definitions leave gaps.
In ordinary speech pollution means making something dirty or impure. That meaning is too wide to be law. Every river carries dissolved minerals, every breath of air carries dust, and rain itself is mildly acidic. A rule forbidding the presence of harmful matter in water would forbid water. The law therefore had to build a definition around a threshold: a substance becomes pollution only when it is present in a quantity, and in a place, where it is or is likely to be injurious.
International law had reached the same idea before India legislated. Principle 6 of the Stockholm Declaration of 1972 speaks of the discharge of toxic substances and the release of heat "in such quantities or concentrations as to exceed the capacity of the environment to render them harmless". The Law of the Sea Convention of 1982, in Article 1(1)(4), defines marine pollution as the introduction by man of "substances or energy" which results or is likely to result in deleterious effects. Both definitions carry a quantity, a receiving environment and a harm, and the Indian statutes follow the same pattern.
Water. Section 2(e) of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 defines pollution as such contamination of water, or such alteration of its physical, chemical or biological properties, or such discharge of sewage, trade effluent or any other liquid, gaseous or solid substance into water, as may, or is likely to, create a nuisance or render the water harmful to public health or safety, to domestic, commercial, industrial, agricultural or other legitimate uses, or to the life and health of animals, plants or aquatic organisms.
Air. Section 2(a) of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 defines an air pollutant as any solid, liquid or gaseous substance, including noise, present in the atmosphere in such concentration as may be or tend to be injurious to human beings, other living creatures, plants, property or environment. Section 2(b) then defines air pollution simply as the presence in the atmosphere of any air pollutant.
Environment. The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 defines environment in section 2(a) to include water, air and land and the inter-relationship among them and with human beings, other living creatures, plants, micro-organisms and property. An environmental pollutant under section 2(b) is any substance present in such concentration as may be, or tend to be, injurious to environment, and environmental pollution under section 2(c) is its presence in the environment.
| Statute | Section | Medium | Threshold words |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water Act, 1974 | 2(e) | water | may, or is likely to, create a nuisance or render harmful |
| Statute | Section | Medium | Threshold words |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air Act, 1981 | 2(a), 2(b) | atmosphere | may be or tend to be injurious |
| Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 | 2(a), 2(b), 2(c) | water, air, land and their inter-relationship | may be, or tend to be, injurious to environment |
The Environment (Protection) Act gives the widest definition because its definition of environment is relational. It does not stop at the three media but includes the inter-relationship between them and living things, so a substance that passes from a waste dump into groundwater and then into a crop is caught at every stage. The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 adopts the same definition of environment in section 2(c), which is why the Tribunal treats harm to land, water and air as one field.
The agent. Something must be introduced or present. The statutes call it any solid, liquid or gaseous substance, and the Air Act adds noise by express words. Those words do little work on their own, since they describe every substance there is.
The receiving medium. The agent must be in water, in the atmosphere or on land. The Water Act widens the medium through its definition of stream in section 2(j), which includes a water course whether flowing or for the time being dry, inland water, sub-terranean waters and notified tidal waters.
The threshold. This is the element that carries the weight. The Environment (Protection) Act and the Air Act both speak of a concentration that "may be, or tend to be, injurious". Below that concentration the same substance in the same medium is not pollution. That is why Indian pollution law is built on notified numerical standards and on consents that permit discharge within them.
Likely rather than proved harm. The definitions work on the likelihood of injury. The Water Act says "is likely to". A regulator need not wait for fish to die before acting, which is the statutory root of the precautionary approach later recognised by the Supreme Court in Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India, (1996) 5 SCC 647.
Classification by receiving medium is the most useful for a law student, because Indian law is organised the same way: one Act or one set of rules for each medium, with the Environment (Protection) Act as the umbrella over all of them.
| Kind | Typical agents | Principal law |
|---|---|---|
| Air | particulates, SO2, NO2, CO, ozone, lead | Air Act, 1981 |
| Water | sewage, trade effluent, run-off, metals | Water Act, 1974 |
| Land and soil | sludge, hazardous and solid waste | 1986 Act and waste rules |
| Noise | industry, traffic, loudspeakers | Air Act s.2(a); Noise Rules, 2000 |
| Marine and coastal | oil, dumped waste, land-based discharge | CRZ Notification; MARPOL |
| Thermal | heated cooling water | Water Act, s.2(e) and s.25(4) |
| Radioactive | radiation, radioactive waste | Atomic Energy Act, 1962 |
| New waste streams | plastic, e-waste, batteries | rules of 2016 and 2022 |
Air pollution is measured against the National Ambient Air Quality Standards notified by the Central Pollution Control Board on 18 November 2009 for twelve pollutants. Water pollution reaches aquifers too, because the Water Act's definition of stream includes sub-terranean waters. Land has no Act of its own and is reached through the 1986 Act and the rules made under it, most recently the Environment Protection (Management of Contaminated Sites) Rules, 2025. Noise is regulated as an air pollutant and under the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000, notified as S.O. 123(E) on 14 February 2000.
Thermal pollution is caught by the Water Act because a change of temperature alters a physical property of water, and section 25(4) lets the Board impose conditions as to the temperature of an effluent. Radioactive pollution sits outside the pollution Acts altogether: section 16 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 lets the Central Government prohibit the possession, use and disposal of radioactive substances without its consent, and section 17(1)(b) provides for rules securing the safe disposal of radioactive waste. New streams of plastic, electronic and battery waste are governed by the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016 as amended, the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2022 and the Battery Waste Management Rules, 2022.
Two classifications cut across this table and are worth a sentence each. By source, pollution may come from a point source such as an outfall or a chimney, which is easy to regulate by consent, or from a non-point source such as farm run-off, which the consent system hardly reaches. By persistence, a pollutant may be biodegradable, like domestic sewage, or persistent, like heavy metals and plastics, which accumulate rather than dilute.
Air pollutants change the atmosphere itself and not only the air people breathe. Sulphur and nitrogen oxides return to earth as acid deposition, which damages vegetation, soil and stone. Fine particles and ground-level ozone reduce visibility and injure crops. Greenhouse gases alter the climate system, and the Supreme Court in M.K. Ranjitsinh v. Union of India, 2024 INSC 280, decided on 21 March 2024, recognised a right against the adverse effects of climate change under Articles 14 and 21.
The effect on the built environment is shown by M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (the Taj Trapezium case), (1997) 2 SCC 353, decided on 30 December 1996. The petition concerned damage to the marble of the Taj Mahal from air pollution in the Agra and Mathura region. The record showed suspended particulate matter at the monument regularly above 200 micrograms per cubic metre against a standard of 100 for a sensitive location. Applying the precautionary and polluter pays principles, the Court directed the 292 industries in the Trapezium to change over to natural gas or relocate. The case matters here because it treats harm to a monument as environmental harm in its own right.
Organic waste consumes the oxygen dissolved in water as it decomposes, and fish and other aquatic life die when the oxygen falls. Nutrients from sewage and fertiliser cause algal blooms that choke lakes, a process called eutrophication. Heavy metals and pesticides do not break down; they pass up the food chain and concentrate at each level, so the harm is felt most by predators and by people who eat fish.
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, (1987) 4 SCC 463, AIR 1988 SC 1037, decided on 22 September 1987, is the leading finding of fact on a river. Tanneries at Jajmau near Kanpur discharged untreated effluent into the Ganga. The Court recorded that effluent from a tannery is ten times as noxious as domestic sewage and directed that tanneries which had not set up even primary treatment plants be closed, observing that closure might bring unemployment and loss of revenue but that life, health and ecology have greater importance. It held the financial capacity of a tannery irrelevant, just as an industry unable to pay minimum wages cannot be allowed to exist.
Land is the medium where pollution hides longest. Sludge dumped on open ground leaches into the aquifer, and contaminated groundwater may take decades to recover. The Central Ground Water Board's Annual Ground Water Quality Report 2024, based on 15,259 monitoring locations, found nitrate beyond the permissible limit in 19.8 per cent of samples, fluoride in 9.04 per cent and arsenic in 3.1 per cent.
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, (1996) 3 SCC 212, decided on 13 February 1996, is the Supreme Court's fullest account of soil and aquifer damage. Chemical units at Bichhri in Udaipur district produced H acid and left its toxic iron and gypsum sludge in the open. The sludge percolated into the ground, turned the village wells dark and unfit for drinking and made the soil unfit for cultivation. A report before the Court put the cost of remediating the soil and well water at Rs 37.385 crore. The Court held the industries absolutely liable and extended the polluter pays principle to the cost of restoring the environment.
Pollution reduces the variety of life as well as its quantity. Sensitive species disappear first from a polluted river or wetland, and the ecosystem that remains is simpler and less resilient. Noise disturbs the breeding and movement of birds and animals, and light and heat change the behaviour of aquatic organisms near an outfall. Because the Environment (Protection) Act defines environment to include micro-organisms and the inter-relationship between living things and the physical media, a harm to an ecosystem is environmental pollution even before any human being is affected.
The case against the definitions deserves stating. First, they are threshold definitions, so a slow build-up that never crosses a notified standard escapes the statutory definition while still degrading the medium, and cumulative harm from many compliant sources is the typical Indian problem. Second, India has no statute on soil pollution as such, and land is reached only through the umbrella Act and a patchwork of rules. Third, light pollution is regulated by no law at all. Fourth, the definitions are medium-bound, whereas the harm moves between media, as the Bichhri sludge moved from land into water. The courts have filled some of the gap by reading a right to a pollution-free environment into Article 21, first stated in Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, AIR 1991 SC 420, (1991) 1 SCC 598, where the Court held that the right to life includes the right to enjoy pollution-free water and air.
Conclusion. In law pollution is not dirtiness but the presence of a substance, including noise and energy, in a receiving medium at a concentration that is or is likely to be injurious, as sections 2(e) of the Water Act, 2(a) and (b) of the Air Act and 2(b) and (c) of the Environment (Protection) Act each provide. Its kinds follow the medium it enters, and Indian law regulates each through its own instrument under the umbrella of the 1986 Act. Its effects run through the atmosphere, water, soil, living organisms and even monuments, as the Taj, Kanpur and Bichhri cases found as facts. The threshold definition makes regulation workable, but it leaves cumulative harm, soil and light largely outside the statutory net, which is why Article 21 remains the backstop.
The rest of the answers
You have read the paper as it was set and the first model answer in full. The remaining answers come with the bundle, along with every other solved paper for this semester.
See the semester for ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or just the solved papers: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, as does the syllabus and module one of every subject.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.