Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Biological Diversity and Legal Order
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 6 Environment and Legal Order
2016 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Biological Diversity and Legal Order
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 6 Environment and Legal Order
2016 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 14 September 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2016 examination.
The law in these answers is stated as at September 2026, and five changes date most textbooks here. The Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act, 2023 took effect on 1 April 2024: contraventions of sections 3, 4, 6 and 7 now attract penalties from an adjudicating officer, codified traditional knowledge and cultivated medicinal plants are outside prior intimation, and section 23(ba) lets State Boards determine benefit sharing. The Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022 took effect on 1 April 2023, reducing six Schedules to four and giving CITES force in Chapter VB. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 is now the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam, 1980. Genome-edited plants carrying no foreign DNA have been exempt from rules 7 to 11 of the biosafety Rules of 1989 since 30 March 2022. And on 29 July 2026, in Vanashakti v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held prior environmental clearance mandatory while upholding the one-time window of 2017.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2016 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2016 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 14 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Q.P. Code 311800, 2016 FIRST HALF, the first paper on the scan
attempt any four of seven, all carry equal marks · 100 Marks
Answer
For full marks, cover: two parts. First the meaning of biodiversity, with its legal definition and levels, and the meaning of flora and fauna in law, because the statutes do not use the same words. Then the need for protection, which reads best in two halves: flora, meaning plants and the forests they form, and fauna, meaning animals, each with the reasons for protection, the threats and the law that answers them, followed by the interdependence that makes protecting one without the other impossible. Close with a comparative table. Work T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India for flora, and State of Bihar v. Murad Ali Khan and Chief Forest Conservator (Wild Life) v. Nisar Khan for fauna.
Biodiversity means the variety of life. Its legal meaning is fixed by Article 2 of the Convention on Biological Diversity 1992 and, in identical terms, by section 2(b) of the Biological Diversity Act 2002: the variability among living organisms from all sources and the ecological complexes of which they are part, including diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems. The definition therefore reaches three levels, the genes within a species, the species themselves and the ecosystems they compose, and it measures difference rather than abundance.
Flora is the plant life of a region and fauna its animal life. Indian statutes express the two in their own terms. Section 2(37) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act 1972 defines wild life to include any animal and any aquatic or land vegetation forming part of a habitat, so that both are protected by the same Act; section 2(1) defines animal to include mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, other chordates and invertebrates, and section 2(27) defines a specified plant as one in Schedule III. Section 2(c) of the Act of 2002 treats plants, animals and micro-organisms alike as biological resources. The Constitution joins them too: Article 48A directs the State to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country, and Article 51A(g) makes it a duty of every citizen to protect them and to have compassion for living creatures.
Plants are the base of every food web and every ecosystem service. Forests hold soil and water, regulate climate and store carbon; grasslands and wetlands support grazing and fisheries; and wild plants supply food, fodder, fuel, fibre, timber and medicine to millions of forest-dependent people. The wild relatives of crops carry the genes future agriculture will need, and endemic species of the Western Ghats, the Himalaya and the north-east exist nowhere else.
Flora is lost chiefly through conversion of land: forests cleared for agriculture, mining, dams, roads and settlements. It is also lost through destructive harvest of timber, bark, roots and whole plants for trade, through fire and overgrazing, and through invasive alien plants such as lantana, which smother native vegetation and alter forests.
Forests. The Indian Forest Act 1927 allows the constitution of reserved and protected forests. The Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam 1980, formerly the Forest (Conservation) Act, requires by section 2 the prior approval of the Central Government before a reserved forest ceases to be reserved, or before any forest land is used for a non-forest purpose, leased to a private body or cleared of naturally grown trees.
The reach of that protection was settled in T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India, (1997) 2 SCC 267, by the order of 12 December 1996. A petition to protect the Nilgiris forests from illegal felling grew into a national case on the implementation of forest law, because States had been treating forests not formally notified, or privately owned, as outside the Act of 1980.
The Supreme Court held that "forest" must be understood according to its dictionary meaning, covering all statutorily recognised forests whether designated reserved, protected or otherwise, and that "forest land" includes any area recorded as forest in Government records irrespective of ownership. It directed that all ongoing non-forest activity in any forest without Central approval, including sawmills, veneer and plywood mills and mining, cease forthwith; banned the felling of trees in the tropical wet evergreen forests of Tirap and Changlang in Arunachal Pradesh and the movement of cut trees and timber out of the seven north-eastern States; and required every State to constitute an expert committee to identify forests. The case bears on the question because it extended legal protection to plant communities wherever they grow, rather than only where a notification happened to exist.
The definition remains contested. The amendment of 2023 confined the Act to land declared or notified as forest and land recorded as forest in Government records on or after 25 October 1980, and in Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1164 of 2023, a challenge to that amendment, the Supreme Court directed by an interim order of 19 February 2024 that the understanding of forest laid down in Godavarman continue to be followed.
Plants as wild life. Sections 29 and 35(6) of the Act of 1972 forbid removing any wild life, including vegetation, from a sanctuary or National Park except under a permit for the better management of wild life. Chapter IIIA protects the specified plants of Schedule III, nineteen in the Schedule enacted in 2022 and in force since 1 April 2023, among them the red vanda, the pitcher plant, kuth and the common yew, by forbidding their picking or uprooting from forest land and licensing their cultivation and trade.
Plants as biological resources. Section 38 of the Act of 2002 allows threatened plant species to be notified and their collection prohibited or regulated, sections 3 and 7 control access to plants for research and commercial use, and the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act 2001 protects farmers' varieties of cultivated flora.
Animals keep ecosystems working. Predators such as tigers regulate herbivores and so protect vegetation, pollinators such as bees, birds and bats make fruit and seed possible, vultures remove carcasses that would otherwise spread disease, and fish and invertebrates sustain rivers and seas. Animals also carry cultural and religious meaning for many communities and support livelihoods through fisheries and tourism.
Fauna faces direct killing for trade in skins, tusks, horns, bones and live animals, loss and fragmentation of habitat, conflict with people over crops and livestock, deaths on roads, railways and power lines, pollution and pesticides, and diseases passed from domestic animals.
Section 9 of the Act of 1972 forbids hunting of any wild animal in Schedules I and II, and "hunting" in section 2(16) includes killing, poisoning, capturing, trapping and taking any body part. Chapters V, VA and VB control and prohibit trade, Chapter IV protects habitats, Chapter IVB protects tigers through tiger reserves, and Chapter VI punishes offences, with three to seven years' imprisonment for offences involving Schedule I animals under section 51. Domestic and captive animals are protected against cruelty by the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960.
The courts have insisted that this law be enforced rather than defeated by procedure. In State of Bihar v. Murad Ali Khan, (1988) 4 SCC 655, decided on 10 October 1988, the accused were alleged to have shot and killed an elephant in the Kundurugutu Range forest in June 1986 and removed its tusks. A Range Officer filed a complaint under section 51 of the Act of 1972 and the Magistrate took cognizance, but the High Court quashed the proceedings, partly because the police had separately registered a case.
The Supreme Court allowed the State's appeals and restored the prosecution, holding that since cognizance of offences under the Act may be taken on the complaint of the officers authorised by section 55, a police case did not bar the Magistrate. It observed that the wild life laws are the result of an increasing awareness of the need to restore the serious ecological imbalances caused by human depredations on nature, and that the preservation of flora and fauna, some species of which are becoming extinct at an alarming rate, is a great and urgent necessity for the survival of humanity. The case bears on the question because it states, in the Supreme Court's own words, why fauna must be protected, and shows the Court refusing to let a technicality defeat that protection.
Protection must also reach the market that drives capture. In Chief Forest Conservator (Wild Life) v. Nisar Khan, (2003) 4 SCC 595, a dealer whose licence to trade in munias, parakeets, mainas and buntings had run until 1990 sought its renewal, claiming to deal in birds bred in captivity, although these were species whose hunting section 9 then forbade, and the High Court directed that a licence be granted. The Supreme Court set the direction aside, holding that trapping is hunting, so that a trade that can be carried on only by trapping wild birds is prohibited, and that the licensing authority must consider the source and manner of supply and the effect of a licence on hunting and trade. The case bears on the question because it shows that protecting fauna requires the law to look past a claim of captive breeding to the wild population behind it.
Plants and animals depend on each other. Most flowering plants need animals to pollinate them or disperse their seeds, and animals need plants for food and shelter. A forest emptied of its animals, sometimes called an empty forest, slowly loses the trees that animals dispersed; a protected tiger without forest to hunt in cannot survive. That is why section 2(37) of the Act of 1972 defines wild life to include vegetation, why sanctuaries and National Parks protect habitat and not only species, and why Article 48A speaks of forests and wild life in one breath.
| Point | Flora | Fauna |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning in law | Vegetation within "wild life", s. 2(37) WLPA; specified plants, s. 2(27); biological resources, s. 2(c) BD Act | Animal, s. 2(1) WLPA; wild animal, s. 2(36); biological resources, s. 2(c) BD Act |
| Main threats | Land conversion, destructive harvest, fire, invasive plants | Poaching and trade, habitat loss, conflict, pollution |
| Point | Flora | Fauna |
|---|---|---|
| Principal protection | Van Adhiniyam s. 2; Indian Forest Act; WLPA Ch IIIA, ss. 29, 35(6); BD Act s. 38 | WLPA s. 9, Chs IV, IVB, V, VA, VB, VI; PCA Act |
| Leading authority | T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad (1996) | Murad Ali Khan; Nisar Khan |
| Constitutional basis | Arts 48A, 51A(g) | Arts 48A, 51A(g) |
Conclusion. Biodiversity means the variability among living organisms and their ecological complexes, within species, between species and of ecosystems, as defined in Article 2 of the Convention and section 2(b) of the Act of 2002, and flora and fauna are its plant and animal forms, joined in law by the definition of wild life in section 2(37) of the Act of 1972 and by Articles 48A and 51A(g). Flora needs protection because plants sustain every ecosystem, livelihood and future crop and are lost mainly to land conversion; the law answers through forest law, given its full reach by the dictionary meaning of forest in Godavarman, still defended against the amendment of 2023, and through protected areas and Schedule III. Fauna needs protection because animals keep ecosystems functioning and are lost to hunting, trade and habitat loss; the law answers through the ban on hunting, trade controls and protected areas, which Murad Ali Khan enforced against procedural objection and Nisar Khan against the pretext of captive breeding. Because each depends on the other, their protection succeeds only when habitats are protected whole.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.