Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Banking Laws
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 2 Business Law
2015 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Banking Laws
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 2 Business Law
2015 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 12 August 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2015 examination.
Three changes date most textbooks on this subject. The Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 2025, commenced in two stages, on 1 August 2025 for governance and audit and 1 November 2025 for nomination: a depositor may now name up to four nominees, and substantial interest in section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, rose from five lakh to two crore rupees, its first revision since 1968. The Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020, lets the Reserve Bank prepare a scheme of reconstruction under section 45 without first obtaining a moratorium, and brought co-operative banks fully under the Act. And since the 2016 amendment to section 13(8) of the Securitisation Act, 2002, a borrower's right to redeem ends when the auction notice is published and not when the sale is made: Celir LLP v. Bafna Motors, 21 September 2023.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2015 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2015 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 10 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Q.P. Code 15881. Attempt any four questions, all questions carry equal marks, cite relevant case laws wherever necessary
any four of five · 100 Marks
Answer
For full marks, cover: the statutory foundation first, because the examiner has set three heads that are all statutory functions and an answer that opens on economics rather than on the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, loses the law marks; then each head in turn with its own sections, because three heads means three separate treatments; under currency, the sole right of issue, the Issue Department, the minimum reserve system and the demonetisation power with the decision that tested it; under banker to the Government, the distinction between the obligation and the right, and the management of public debt; under bankers' bank, the cash reserve ratio, the clearing function and the lender of last resort; under bank rate, the definition the Act itself gives, the reason the rate has become a legal reference point rather than an operative one, and what displaced it.
The Reserve Bank of India was constituted by the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, and began operations on 1 April 1935. It was recommended by the Royal Commission on Indian Currency and Finance of 1926, usually called the Hilton Young Commission, which proposed a single institution to hold the note issue and the banking reserves that were then divided between the Government and the Imperial Bank of India. It began as a shareholders' bank and was taken into public ownership by the Reserve Bank (Transfer to Public Ownership) Act, 1948, with effect from 1 January 1949, so its entire share capital of five crore rupees is now held by the Central Government.
The preamble states the mandate and is worth quoting in an answer because all three heads set by this question fall out of it. It speaks of regulating the issue of bank notes and keeping of reserves with a view to securing monetary stability in India, and generally operating the currency and credit system of the country to its advantage. The Finance Act, 2016, added a further clause, that the primary objective of monetary policy is to maintain price stability while keeping in mind the objective of growth. Currency is the first limb, the reserves of the banking system are the second, and the bank rate is one of the instruments by which the credit system is operated.
The Bank works through a Central Board constituted under section 8. It consists of the Governor, not more than four Deputy Governors, four Directors nominated one each from the four Local Boards, ten Directors nominated by the Central Government and two Government officials. Section 7 preserves a power in the Central Government to give directions in the public interest after consultation with the Governor, a section that has never formally been invoked but was publicly discussed during the disagreement between the Government and the Bank in 2018. The point for an answer is that the Bank's autonomy is statutory and qualified rather than constitutional.
The core provision is section 22, which gives the Reserve Bank the sole right to issue bank notes in India. Section 23 requires the note issue to be conducted through a separate Issue Department whose assets are segregated from the Banking Department, so that the note liability is always matched by identifiable cover. Section 24 fixes the denominations in which notes may be issued and permits the Central Government to specify others, subject to a ceiling of ten thousand rupees. Section 25 provides that the design, form and material of notes are approved by the Central Government on the recommendation of the Central Board.
One rupee notes and all coins are not issued by the Bank at all. They are issued by the Central Government under the Coinage Act, 2011, and section 38 of the Reserve Bank of India Act provides that they are put into circulation only through the Bank. The distinction is regularly missed and is worth a line, because it shows that the monopoly in section 22 is a monopoly over bank notes and not over legal tender as such.
The backing for the note issue rests on the minimum reserve system introduced by the Reserve Bank of India (Amendment) Act, 1957. Before that the Bank ran a proportional reserve system under which forty per cent of the note issue had to be covered by gold and sterling securities. Section 33 now requires the assets of the Issue Department to include gold coin, gold bullion and foreign securities of an aggregate value of not less than two hundred crore rupees, of which the gold component is not to be less than one hundred and fifteen crore rupees, the balance being made up of rupee securities and eligible bills. The change is significant in principle: the note issue is no longer tied to a metallic proportion, and the real discipline on the quantity of money is monetary policy rather than the cover requirement.
Section 26(1) makes every bank note legal tender for the amount expressed in it and guaranteed by the Central Government. Section 26(2) is the provision under which currency is withdrawn from circulation. It permits the Central Government, on the recommendation of the Central Board, by notification in the Gazette, to declare that any series of bank notes of any denomination shall cease to be legal tender, save at such office or agency and to such extent as may be specified.
Section 26(2) was tested by the withdrawal of the five hundred and one thousand rupee notes of the Mahatma Gandhi series announced on 8 November 2016, and upheld in Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India, decided by a Constitution Bench on 2 January 2023. The petitioners argued that the words "any series" cannot bear the meaning "all series", that the two earlier demonetisations of 1946 and 1978 had each been carried out by plenary legislation, and that the initiative had come from the Central Government rather than from the Central Board as the section requires.
The majority, Nazeer, Gavai, Bopanna and Ramasubramanian JJ., held that the power extends to all series of a denomination, that the six month consultation between the Government and the Bank satisfied the section, and that the measure bore a reasonable nexus to its stated objects, adding that a policy decision is not invalid merely because some citizens suffered hardship.
Nagarathna J. dissented and the dissent is the more useful half of the case for an examination answer. She held that "any series" cannot be read to include the entire denomination, that a proposal originating with the Central Government cannot be dressed up as a recommendation of the Central Board, and that a measure withdrawing eighty six per cent of the currency in circulation by value could only be taken by legislation, since Parliament is the forum in which such a measure must be debated. She declined to grant relief because the notes had long since been exchanged, so the dissent is declaratory. It matters because it identifies the constitutional limit on an executive currency power and because it treats the Central Board's independent recommendation as a jurisdictional fact rather than a formality.
Currency regulation has since acquired a digital limb. The Finance Act, 2022, amended the definition of "bank note" in the Reserve Bank of India Act to include a bank note issued in digital form, which read with section 22 is what allows the Bank to issue central bank digital currency. The wholesale pilot of the digital rupee began on 1 November 2022 and the retail pilot on 1 December 2022. The legislative technique is worth noticing: rather than create a new instrument, Parliament extended the definition of the old one, so the digital rupee is legal tender on exactly the same footing as a printed note.
The Bank's obligation to the Union is in section 20 and its right is in section 21, and the difference between them is the point. Section 20 imposes a duty: the Bank shall undertake to accept monies for account of the Central Government, to make payments up to the amount standing to its credit, and to carry out its exchange, remittance and other banking operations, including the management of the public debt. Section 21 confers a corresponding right, so that the Central Government shall entrust the Bank with all its money, remittance, exchange and banking transactions in India, and shall deposit free of interest all its cash balances with the Bank. Section 21A extends the same arrangement to State Governments by agreement.
Three practical consequences follow and each is worth a sentence. First, the Bank manages the public debt of the Union and of the States, which means it conducts the auctions of dated securities and treasury bills, maintains the ownership records and services the interest. Secondly, it provides Ways and Means Advances, temporary accommodation to bridge the mismatch between receipts and payments, repayable within three months, which are limited in amount by agreement and are not a means of financing the deficit. Thirdly, since the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003, the Bank has been prohibited from subscribing to primary issues of Central Government securities, which ended the automatic monetisation of the deficit and is the single most important structural reform in this relationship.
As bankers' bank the Bank is the banker of the commercial banking system, and the statutory hook is section 42. Every scheduled bank, that is a bank included in the Second Schedule under section 42(6), must maintain with the Bank a cash reserve of such percentage of its net demand and time liabilities as the Bank may from time to time notify. This is the cash reserve ratio. Until 22 June 2006 the section confined the ratio between three and twenty per cent; the Reserve Bank of India (Amendment) Act, 2006, removed both the floor and the ceiling, so the Bank now sets the ratio without statutory limit. The same amendment omitted section 42(1B), with the result that no interest is paid on cash reserve balances, which is what makes the ratio a genuine instrument of monetary control rather than a form of deposit.
The companion requirement, the statutory liquidity ratio, sits not in the Reserve Bank of India Act but in section 24 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and requires every banking company to maintain in cash, gold or unencumbered approved securities a stated percentage of its demand and time liabilities, subject to a statutory ceiling of forty per cent. The two ratios do different work: the cash reserve ratio drains liquidity to the central bank, while the statutory liquidity ratio compels the banks to hold safe assets and so protects depositors as well as funding the Government. At the policy of August 2026 the cash reserve ratio stands at three per cent and the statutory liquidity ratio at eighteen per cent.
The third element of the bankers' bank function is the role of lender of last resort. Section 17(4) permits the Bank to make advances to scheduled banks against eligible security, and section 18 confers an emergency power to lend to any bank or person against securities of a kind the Bank would not ordinarily accept, where the Bank considers it necessary in the interest of trade, commerce, industry or agriculture. Section 18 is the true last resort power because it is exercisable outside the ordinary collateral rules, and its existence is what makes a run on a solvent but illiquid bank a manageable event. To it must be added the settlement function: the Bank operates the payment systems under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, and the accounts that banks maintain with it under section 42 are the accounts across which interbank obligations are settled.
Bank rate is defined by section 49 of the Reserve Bank of India Act as the standard rate at which the Bank is prepared to buy or rediscount bills of exchange or other commercial paper eligible for purchase under the Act. The section requires the Bank to make the rate public. Historically it was the pivot of monetary policy: raising it made refinance from the central bank dearer, which was passed on in lending rates and contracted credit, and lowering it did the reverse.
Its operative role has been displaced, and an answer that presents the bank rate as the working instrument of Indian monetary policy is out of date by many years. Since the liquidity adjustment facility was introduced the working rate has been the repo rate, the rate at which the Bank lends overnight to banks against Government securities. Since the realignment of February 2012 the bank rate has been kept equal to the marginal standing facility rate, which is itself fixed at a margin above the repo rate, so the bank rate now moves automatically with the repo rate and carries no independent signal.
It nevertheless remains legally important, which is the point most answers miss. Because a large number of statutes and contracts refer to the bank rate, it continues to serve as the reference rate for penal interest, including the penalty on a shortfall in the cash reserve ratio, and for various rates fixed by reference to it in other legislation. In other words the bank rate has moved from being an instrument of policy to being a legal benchmark, and it survives in the Act for that reason.
What replaced it is the framework in Chapter III F of the Act, inserted by the Finance Act, 2016. Section 45ZA requires the Central Government, in consultation with the Bank, to determine the inflation target in terms of the Consumer Price Index once every five years, and the target has been set at four per cent with a tolerance band of two per cent on either side.
Section 45ZB constitutes the Monetary Policy Committee of six members: the Governor as ex officio chairperson, the Deputy Governor in charge of monetary policy, an officer of the Bank nominated by the Central Board, and three members appointed by the Central Government. Decisions are by majority and the Governor has a casting vote in the event of a tie. The Committee must meet at least four times a year, and section 45ZN makes a failure to maintain the target for three consecutive quarters a failure that obliges the Bank to report to the Central Government with the reasons and the remedial action proposed.
The instruments the Committee actually uses are worth naming. The repo rate is the policy rate; the standing deposit facility, introduced in April 2022, is the floor of the corridor and absorbs liquidity without collateral; the marginal standing facility is the ceiling; and open market operations, the cash reserve ratio and the statutory liquidity ratio are the quantitative instruments. At the meeting of 5 August 2026 the Committee kept the repo rate at 5.25 per cent with a neutral stance. The legal significance of the 2016 framework is that monetary policy ceased to be the personal responsibility of the Governor and became a statutory committee decision against a statutory target, which is a substantial change in the constitutional position of the central bank.
The leading authority is Joseph Kuruvilla Vellukunnel v. Reserve Bank of India, AIR 1962 SC 1371, decided on 7 March 1962, and no answer on the special position of banks is complete without it. The Palai Central Bank Ltd., incorporated in 1927, had grown into the largest bank in Kerala with twenty five branches and stood about fifteenth in India. The Reserve Bank formed the opinion that it could not pay its depositors in full and that its continuance was prejudicial to their interests, and applied for its winding up.
A director challenged sections 38 and 39 of the Banking Companies Act, 1949, under Article 14, arguing that banking companies were denied the procedural protections other companies enjoy and that the Reserve Bank had been given a broad and unchecked power over their existence. The Supreme Court upheld both sections. Banks are a class apart because they trade on deposits taken from the public, and a differential procedure that protects depositors and financial stability is a permissible classification.
The consequence is the whole of Part III. Because the discrimination is justified, the High Court may be bound rather than left with a discretion, the Reserve Bank rather than a creditor may hold the initiative, and the Bank's own opinion on solvency may be made the operative fact. Every feature of the winding up code that looks harsh beside ordinary company law rests on this decision.
Two later decisions mark the outer edge of the Bank's powers and both should be given. In Reserve Bank of India v. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd., (1987) 1 SCC 424, a residuary non banking company ran a savings scheme under which a subscriber who defaulted forfeited most of what he had paid, and the Bank issued directions regulating such schemes. The Supreme Court upheld the directions, holding them within the wide depositor protecting power in Chapter III B, so the Bank's reach extends to institutions that are not banks at all.
In Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India, decided on 4 March 2020, the balance went the other way. The Bank had directed the entities it regulates to stop providing services in relation to virtual currencies. The Supreme Court accepted that the power existed and that the subject was within the Bank's concern, but set the circular aside on proportionality, because the Bank had not shown that any regulated entity had actually suffered damage while the direction cut an entire trade off from banking services.
Read together the three decisions state the position exactly. The Bank's opinion on a bank's solvency is treated as decisive, its regulatory reach runs well beyond banks, and neither of those propositions exempts a particular exercise of power from being tested for proportionality.
Conclusion. The three heads set by this question are not three separate activities but three faces of one statutory mandate. The Reserve Bank regulates currency because section 22 gives it the monopoly of note issue and section 33 tells it what must stand behind the notes; it is banker to the Government because sections 20 and 21 impose a duty and confer a corresponding right, and banker to the banks because section 42 compels every scheduled bank to keep its reserves with it and sections 17 and 18 make it the lender of last resort; and it fixes the bank rate under section 49 because the price of central bank money is how the credit system is operated to the country's advantage, which is what the preamble requires of it.
What an answer should show is that each of the three has moved. Currency regulation now includes a digital bank note and has been tested at its outer limit in the demonetisation case, where the majority upheld the executive power and the dissent identified where it should stop. The relationship with the Government has been reformed by the prohibition on subscribing to primary issues of Government paper, which ended automatic monetisation of the deficit. And the bank rate has been quietly demoted from instrument to benchmark, its policy work taken over by the repo rate and by the Monetary Policy Committee that the Finance Act, 2016, created. The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, is a pre independence statute still doing modern work, and it does so because Parliament has repeatedly amended its operative provisions while leaving the architecture of 1934 in place.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, as does the syllabus and module one of every subject.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.