About AIBE VIII 2015 Set A
AIBE VIII 2015 Set A is a real All India Bar Examination paper: 100 multiple choice questions, three hours, one mark each and no negative marking. You sit it here in exam mode, with the timer, the question palette and mark for review working as they do in the real thing.
Every answer comes from the Bar Council of India's own final answer key, published at allindiabarexamination.com, not from anyone's reading of the paper. The pass mark is 45% for General and OBC candidates.
The first 10 questions of AIBE VIII 2015 Set A
These 10 are free to attempt above, with no sign-in. The correct answers, your score and your rank come with the pass.
-
"Mere illegality of the strike does not per se spell unjustifiability". J. Krishna Iyer. In which case declared so -
- AChandramalai Estate vs. Its workmen
- BAssociated Cement Ltd. vs. Their workmen
- CGujarat Steel Tubes vs. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha
- DIndian General Navigation of Railway Co. Ltd. vs. Their workmen
-
Entry No. 22 of the Concurrent List deals with-
- ASocial security and insurance, employment and unemployment
- BIndustrial disputes concerning Union employees
- CTrade unions and industrial and labour disputes
- DRegulation of labour and safety in mines and oil fields
-
Which Article under the Constitution of India talks about the participation of workers in the management of Industries?
-
Pick out the case that is popularly called as the Solicitor's Case.
- AAhmedabad Textile Industry's Research Association vs. State of Bombay
- BNational Union of Commercial Employees vs. Industrial Tribunal Bombay
- CSalem Advocates Bar Association vs. Union of India
- DCentral Machine Tools Institute vs. Dy. Registrar of Trade Unions
-
Identify the case that is related to the need for promotion and preservation of internal democracy within trade unions.
- AJay Engineering Works Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal
- BRailway Union vs. Registrar of Trade Unions
- CONGC Workmens Association vs. State of West Bengal
- DHanumantha Rao vs. Dy. Registrar of Trade Unions
-
In tort, there are two broad categories of activities for which a plaintiff may be held strictly liable-
- APossession of certain animals and abnormally dangerous activities
- BAssault and battery
- CBattery and negligence
- DNone of the above
-
Selvi's daughter Kavita had married Shivakumar of a different caste against the wishes of her family. Shivakumar was brutally killed in 2004, and Selvi and two others became the suspects. Since the prosecution's case depended entirely on circumstantial evidence, it sought the Court's permission to conduct polygraphy and brain-mapping tests on the three persons. The Court granted permission and the tests were conducted. When the results of the polygraphy test indicated signs of deception, the prosecution sought the Court's permission to perform narcoanalysis on the three persons. The Magistrate directed the three to undergo narcoanalysis. All of them challenged this decision in the Karnataka High Court, but failed to get relief. They then went in appeal to the Supreme Court. The Court held
- ACompulsory brain-mapping and polygraph tests and narcoanalysis were in violation of Articles 20(3) and 21 of the Constitution.
- BCompulsory brain-mapping and polygraph tests and narcoanalysis were valid under Articles 20(3) and 21 of the Constitution.
- CCompulsory brain-mapping and polygraph tests and narcoanalysis were in violation of Articles 20(1) and 21 of the Constitution.
- DCompulsory brain-mapping and polygraph tests and narcoanalysis were in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution
-
According to Article 71 Disputes arising in connection with the elections of a President or Vice- President are to be enquired into and decided by
- AThe Supreme Court
- BHigh Court
- CBoth by High Court and Supreme Court.
- DTribunal established for that purpose.
-
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 regulates
- AThe discharge of hazardous pollutants into the nation's surface water.
- BThe emission of hazardous air pollutants.
- CWaste disposal of sea.
- DThe transportation of hazardous materials.
-
It was held by the Supreme Court that noise pollution beyond permissible limits cannot be tolerated, even if such noise was a direct result of and was connected with religious activities in the case of
- AVellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs. Union of India
- BChurch of God (Full Gospel) in India vs. KKR Majestic Colony Welfare Association
- CRural Enlightenment Kendra vs. Union of India
- DNarmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India
Questions 11 to 100 of this paper, the correct answer to every one of them, your score and your rank: Rs 499, validity 1 year.
All 19 AIBE previous year question papers
