Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Corporate Law
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 2 Business Law
2019 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Corporate Law
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 2 Business Law
2019 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 12 August 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2019 examination.
Four changes date most textbooks on this subject. Inability to pay debts ceased to be a ground of winding up on 15 November 2016, when the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code substituted section 271, and voluntary winding up went with it: sections 304 to 323 were omitted and section 59 of the Code took over. The Company Law Board was dissolved on 1 June 2016 on the constitution of the National Company Law Tribunal. The certificate of commencement of business is gone: section 11 was omitted on 29 May 2015 and replaced from 2 November 2018 by the declaration in section 10A. And the statement in lieu of prospectus, section 70 of the Act of 1956, has no counterpart in the Act of 2013; section 42 on private placement does its work.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2019 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2019 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Form 77205. Attempt any four questions, all questions carry equal marks
any four of seven · 100 Marks
Answer
For full marks, cover: three limbs. Managerial personnel as section 2(51) defines them and sections 196, 197 and 203 regulate them, with the remuneration ceiling stated as a number; the Board through the paper's own four words, rights, duties, liabilities and disabilities, with section 166 and section 164 doing most of the work; and meetings as two distinct systems with the notice, quorum and majority rules given as figures, because those are what an examiner can mark.
Section 2(51) defines key managerial personnel exhaustively: the Chief Executive Officer or the managing director or the manager; the company secretary; the whole-time director; the Chief Financial Officer; and such other officer, not more than one level below the directors, in whole-time employment and designated as such by the Board.
Section 203 makes the appointment compulsory for every listed company and, under Rule 8 of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, every other public company with a paid-up share capital of ten crore rupees or more, which must have a whole-time managing director or Chief Executive Officer or manager and, in their absence, a whole-time director, together with a company secretary and a Chief Financial Officer; the same person may not be both chairperson and managing director or Chief Executive Officer unless the articles otherwise provide or the company carries on multiple businesses; and a vacancy must be filled within six months.
Section 196 governs the appointment of the managing director, whole-time director or manager: no company may appoint a managing director and a manager at the same time; the term may not exceed five years at a time, and reappointment may not be made earlier than one year before expiry; the appointee must be between twenty one and seventy years of age, appointment beyond seventy requiring a special resolution or, since 2017, an ordinary resolution with the Central Government's satisfaction; he must not be an undischarged insolvent, must not have suspended payment to creditors and must not have been sentenced to imprisonment for more than six months; and the appointment must be approved by the Board and by the company in general meeting and comply with Schedule V or be approved by the Central Government.
Section 197 caps the pay. The total managerial remuneration payable by a public company to its directors, including the managing director, whole-time director and manager, may not exceed eleven per cent of the net profits computed under section 198; within that, five per cent to one managing or whole-time director or manager and ten per cent to all of them together, and one per cent to other directors where there is a managing or whole-time director and three per cent otherwise. The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 replaced Central Government approval for exceeding those limits with a special resolution, with the prior approval of a defaulted lender. Section 197(3) permits minimum remuneration in the absence or inadequacy of profits only in accordance with Schedule V, and sections 197(9) and (10) require the refund of any excess, waivable only by special resolution.
The role, as distinct from the machinery, is the point to state. Section 179(1) vests in the Board all the powers the company may exercise, so managerial personnel act by delegation; section 179(3) lists the powers exercisable only at a Board meeting, with a proviso permitting borrowing, investment and lending to be delegated to a committee, the managing director, the manager or a principal officer; and section 180 reserves four decisions to the members by special resolution. Administration is therefore a three-tier structure: the members hold the largest powers, the Board holds the residue and delegates the day to day, and the key managerial personnel execute and are liable as officers in default within section 2(60).
Section 149(1) fixes the composition: three directors for a public company, two for a private company, one for a One Person Company, a maximum of fifteen beyond which a special resolution is needed, at least one woman director in prescribed classes, and, under section 149(4), at least one third independent directors in a listed public company; section 149(3) requires one director resident in India for one hundred and eighty two days.
The rights are collective, and that is the first thing to say: no individual director can bind the company. Collectively the Board may exercise every power of the company under section 179(1), appoint additional, alternate and casual vacancy directors under section 161, recommend dividend under section 123(1), make calls, and delegate within section 179(3). Individually a director has the right to notice of every Board meeting under section 173(3), to inspect the books of account under section 128(3), to sitting fees under section 197(5), to participate by video conferencing under section 173(2) except for the matters in Rule 4, and to have his dissent recorded in the minutes under section 118, which is the only reliable protection under section 149(12).
Section 166 codified the duties for the first time in Indian law. A director must act in accordance with the articles; act in good faith to promote the objects of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in the best interests of the company, its employees, the shareholders, the community and for the protection of the environment; exercise his duties with due and reasonable care, skill and diligence and exercise independent judgment; avoid any situation of conflict; not achieve any undue gain for himself or his relatives, partners or associates, and if he does, pay an equivalent amount to the company; and not assign his office, any assignment being void.
Three provisions enforce them. Section 184 requires disclosure of interest at the first Board meeting of each financial year and before any contract, an interested director not counting in the quorum. Section 188 requires Board approval, and above thresholds a members' resolution, for related party transactions. Sections 185 and 186 restrict loans to directors and cap loans and investments at sixty per cent of paid-up capital, free reserves and securities premium, or one hundred per cent of free reserves and securities premium, whichever is higher.
Four kinds. To the company, for breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and misfeasance, enforced by the company, by the Tribunal under section 242, by a class action under section 245, and in winding up under section 340. To outsiders, under section 35 for a misstatement in a prospectus, and personally where the company had no capacity, as in A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar v. Life Insurance Corporation of India, AIR 1963 SC 1185, where directors who paid Rs. 75,000 to a charitable trust outside the memorandum were held personally liable to refund it. Statutory penalties as an officer in default under section 2(60). And criminal liability for fraud under section 447, with imprisonment of six months to ten years, and personal responsibility without any limitation of liability under section 339 for fraudulent trading in a winding up.
Section 149(12) is the qualification: an independent director and a non-executive director who is not a promoter or key managerial personnel is liable only for acts which occurred with his knowledge, attributable through Board processes, and with his consent or connivance, or where he had not acted diligently.
The paper's word means the disqualifications and the restrictions on office. Section 164(1): unsound mind so declared; undischarged insolvent; a pending insolvency application; conviction with a sentence of not less than six months where five years have not elapsed, and permanent disqualification on a sentence of seven years or more; an order of disqualification by a court or Tribunal; calls unpaid for six months; conviction under section 188 in the preceding five years; and non-compliance with section 152(3) on the Director Identification Number.
Section 164(2) disqualifies for five years a person who is or has been a director of a company that has not filed financial statements or annual returns for three continuous financial years or has defaulted for a year in repaying deposits, redeeming debentures or paying declared dividend. Section 165 caps directorships at twenty, of which ten may be public companies. Section 167 vacates the office on a disqualification, on absence from all Board meetings during twelve months, on contravening section 184, and on conviction. Section 169 permits removal by ordinary resolution after special notice and a hearing.
Two systems, and they must not be run together.
General meetings. Section 96, the annual general meeting: the first within nine months of the close of the first financial year and every other within six months, with not more than fifteen months between two, held between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., not on a National Holiday, at the registered office or within the same city, with an extension of up to three months available from the Registrar except for the first.
Section 100, the extraordinary general meeting, called by the Board or on the requisition of members holding one tenth of the paid-up capital carrying voting rights, with the requisitionists free to call it themselves within three months if the Board does not proceed within twenty one days. Section 98, a meeting ordered by the Tribunal where it is impracticable to call one, the Tribunal being able to direct that one member present shall constitute a meeting.
The machinery. Section 101, twenty one clear days' notice, with shorter notice on the consent of ninety five per cent of the members entitled to vote. Section 102, an explanatory statement for special business. Section 103, quorum of five, fifteen or thirty members personally present for a public company according to its membership, and two for a private company, with the adjournment rules in section 103(2) and (3). Section 105, a proxy who may not speak and may vote only on a poll, and who, under Rule 19(2) of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014, may not act for more than fifty members holding in the aggregate not more than ten per cent of the total share capital carrying voting rights.
Section 109, a poll on the demand of members holding one tenth of the voting power or five lakh rupees of paid-up capital. Sections 108 and 110, electronic voting and postal ballot for prescribed companies and items. Section 114, the ordinary resolution by simple majority and the special resolution requiring the votes in favour to be not less than three times the votes against. Sections 117, 118 and 119, filing of resolutions, minutes within thirty days as evidence of the proceedings, and members' inspection.
Board meetings. Section 173, the first within thirty days of incorporation and thereafter four a year with not more than one hundred and twenty days between two, reduced to two a year for a One Person Company, small company and dormant company; seven days' notice, with a shorter notice meeting valid if an independent director is present or ratifies it; and video conferencing except for the matters in Rule 4. Section 174, quorum of one third of the total strength or two directors, whichever is higher. Section 175, a resolution by circulation except where the matter must be dealt with at a meeting. Section 177 and section 178 add the audit committee and the nomination and remuneration and stakeholders relationship committees, and Schedule IV requires the independent directors to meet once a year without management.
Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Escorts Ltd., (1986) 1 SCC 264, decided on 19 December 1985, is the leading Indian case on the requisitioned meeting. The Life Insurance Corporation, holding a large stake in Escorts, requisitioned an extraordinary general meeting to remove several directors before the expiry of their terms and appoint others. The company resisted, arguing among other things that the Corporation, as an instrumentality of the State, must disclose the reasons for the resolutions it proposed.
The Supreme Court held that a shareholder, including a State instrumentality acting as a shareholder, has the same right as any other member to requisition a meeting and is not bound to disclose his motives; the duty to give an explanatory statement of material facts lies on the management in respect of business it brings, not on the requisitionists. The case is the practical guarantee behind section 100: the power to call a meeting would be worth nothing if the board could demand reasons first.
Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co. Ltd. v. Cuninghame, [1906] 2 Ch 34, settles the relationship between the two organs. The articles vested the management of the business in the directors. The general meeting passed an ordinary resolution directing them to sell the company undertaking, and they refused. The Court of Appeal held the resolution did not bind the directors: where the constitution has vested a power in the board, the members cannot exercise it or dictate its exercise by ordinary resolution, and their remedies are to alter the articles by special resolution under section 14 or to remove the directors under section 169. That is why section 179(1) is expressed as a grant to the Board of everything not reserved to the members, and why section 180 has to name expressly the four decisions the members keep.
Read together the two cases describe the constitutional settlement inside a company: the members control who the directors are and the largest decisions, and may summon a meeting without explaining themselves; the directors control the business and cannot be instructed on it. Everything in the law of meetings, from the notice period in section 101 to the quorum in section 103 and the majority in section 114, is machinery for working that settlement.
Conclusion. Administration runs through three tiers: the members, who hold the four powers in section 180 and act at meetings governed by sections 96 to 122; the Board, which holds every other power under section 179(1) and acts at meetings governed by sections 173 to 175; and the key managerial personnel under sections 2(51), 196, 197 and 203, who execute what is delegated for remuneration the Act caps at eleven per cent of net profits. The Board's rights are collective and its individual rights procedural; its duties are those in section 166; its liabilities run to the company, to outsiders and to the State, qualified for independent directors by section 149(12); and its disabilities are the disqualifications in section 164 and the vacation provisions in section 167.
The rest of the answers
You have read the paper as it was set and the first model answer in full. The remaining answers come with the bundle, along with every other solved paper for this semester.
See the semester for ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or just the solved papers: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, as does the syllabus and module one of every subject.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.