Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Corporate Law
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 2 Business Law
2025-26 - Set 2 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Corporate Law
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 2 Business Law
2025-26 - Set 2 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 12 August 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2025-26 - Set 2 examination.
Four changes date most textbooks on this subject. Inability to pay debts ceased to be a ground of winding up on 15 November 2016, when the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code substituted section 271, and voluntary winding up went with it: sections 304 to 323 were omitted and section 59 of the Code took over. The Company Law Board was dissolved on 1 June 2016 on the constitution of the National Company Law Tribunal. The certificate of commencement of business is gone: section 11 was omitted on 29 May 2015 and replaced from 2 November 2018 by the declaration in section 10A. And the statement in lieu of prospectus, section 70 of the Act of 1956, has no counterpart in the Act of 2013; section 42 on private placement does its work.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2025-26 - Set 2 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2025-26 - Set 2 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 7 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Form 16444. Attempt any four questions, all questions carry equal marks
any four of seven · 100 Marks
Answer
For full marks, cover: the concept first, that a company can form and express a will only through a meeting, which is why the law of meetings is the law of corporate decision-making; then the kinds, in two families, meetings of members and meetings of directors, with the class meeting and the creditors' meeting as the third and fourth; and then the third limb properly, because most answers stop at the second. Corporate governance has changed meetings in four measurable ways, and each has a provision or a regulation behind it: electronic voting, the postal ballot, the committee structure that has taken business out of the full Board, and disclosure of what happens at the meeting.
A company has no mind and no voice; it acts through resolutions passed at meetings. Two organs are capable of forming its will, the general body of members and the Board of directors, and the Act divides the powers between them: section 179(1) gives the Board every power the company has except those the Act or the constitution reserves to the members, and section 180 reserves four of the largest decisions to the members by special resolution. A meeting is therefore not a formality but the only mechanism by which either organ can act.
The law of meetings exists to make that mechanism fair, and it does so through five requirements which recur in every kind of meeting: proper authority to convene, adequate notice with an agenda, a quorum, a chairman, and a record. The consequence of failing any of them is that the resolution is not the company's act at all.
One proposition worth stating early because it explains the whole subject. A meeting is not a mere gathering; it is the occasion on which those entitled to decide hear each other before deciding. That is why section 102 requires an explanatory statement for special business, why section 101 requires twenty one clear days' notice, why an item not on the agenda cannot ordinarily be taken up, and why the courts insist that notice be given to every member entitled to attend, even one whose vote could not have changed the result.
Family one, meetings of members.
The annual general meeting, section 96. Every company other than a One Person Company must hold one in each year. The first must be held within nine months of the close of the first financial year and every subsequent one within six months of the close of the financial year, with not more than fifteen months between one and the next; the Registrar may extend by up to three months for special reason, but never the first.
It must be held between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., not on a National Holiday, and at the registered office or another place within the same city, town or village, except that an unlisted company may meet anywhere in India with the advance written consent of all members. Its ordinary business, under section 102(2), is the consideration of the financial statements and the reports, the declaration of dividend, the appointment of directors in place of those retiring and the appointment and fixing of remuneration of auditors; everything else is special business requiring an explanatory statement.
The extraordinary general meeting, section 100, is any general meeting other than the annual one, called by the Board on its own motion or on the requisition of members holding not less than one tenth of the paid-up share capital carrying voting rights, and section 100(4) allows the requisitionists themselves to call it within three months where the Board does not proceed within twenty one days, the reasonable expenses being repaid to them by the company under section 100(6).
A meeting ordered by the Tribunal, section 98, where it is impracticable to call a meeting in the manner the Act or the articles prescribe, and the Tribunal may direct that one member present shall be deemed to constitute a meeting, which is the standard answer to a deliberate boycott by a faction that holds the quorum.
Family two, meetings of directors.
Board meetings, section 173. The first within thirty days of incorporation, and thereafter a minimum of four in each year with not more than one hundred and twenty days between two consecutive meetings, reduced to two a year for a One Person Company, a small company and a dormant company under section 173(5). Not less than seven days' notice in writing, with a shorter notice meeting for urgent business valid only if at least one independent director is present or ratifies it.
Participation by video conferencing is permitted except for the matters listed in Rule 4 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, which include approval of the financial statements, the Board's report, a prospectus and a scheme of amalgamation. Section 174 fixes the quorum at one third of the total strength or two directors, whichever is higher, with a special rule where interested directors reduce it below that. Section 175 permits a resolution by circulation except where the matter must be dealt with at a meeting, and a resolution so passed must be noted at the next meeting.
Committee meetings are now a substantial part of corporate decision-making: the audit committee under section 177, the nomination and remuneration committee and the stakeholders relationship committee under section 178, and the corporate social responsibility committee under section 135. Schedule IV requires the independent directors to hold at least one meeting in a financial year without the attendance of non-independent directors and members of management, at which they review the performance of the non-independent directors and of the Board as a whole, review the performance of the chairperson, and assess the quality and timeliness of the flow of information between management and the Board.
Family three, class meetings, section 48, for the variation of the rights attached to a class of shares, requiring the consent in writing of the holders of three fourths of the issued shares of that class or a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of that class; and where holders of not less than ten per cent of the class did not consent or vote for the variation, they may apply to the Tribunal to have it cancelled.
Family four, meetings of creditors and members ordered by the Tribunal, section 230, for a compromise or arrangement, requiring approval by a majority in number representing three fourths in value of each class present and voting.
Notice, section 101: at least twenty one clear days in writing or by electronic mode, to every member, legal representative of a deceased member, assignee of an insolvent member, auditor and director; shorter notice is permitted with the consent of not less than ninety five per cent of the members entitled to vote. Explanatory statement, section 102, for every item of special business, disclosing the nature of the concern or interest of every director, manager, key managerial personnel and their relatives.
Quorum, section 103: for a public company, five members personally present where the number of members is up to one thousand, fifteen where it is between one thousand and five thousand, and thirty where it exceeds five thousand; for a private company, two. If the quorum is not present within half an hour, the meeting stands adjourned to the same day in the next week at the same time and place, or as the Board determines, with not less than three days' notice; a requisitioned meeting stands cancelled; and at the adjourned meeting the members present are the quorum.
Voting. Section 105, a proxy, who may not speak and may vote only on a poll, and who, under Rule 19(2) of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014, may not act for more than fifty members holding in the aggregate not more than ten per cent of the total share capital carrying voting rights. Section 106, restriction of voting rights where calls are unpaid. Section 107, a show of hands, and section 109, a poll, which must be ordered on the demand of members holding one tenth of the total voting power or paid-up capital of five lakh rupees. Section 114, the ordinary resolution carried by a simple majority and the special resolution, requiring the votes cast in favour to be not less than three times the votes cast against.
Record. Section 117 requires prescribed resolutions to be filed with the Registrar; section 118 requires minutes to be entered within thirty days and makes them evidence of the proceedings; and section 119 gives members the right to inspect the minutes of general meetings and to obtain copies.
Corporate governance has changed meetings in four measurable ways, and each has a provision behind it.
One, attendance has been separated from participation. Section 108 requires electronic voting for the classes of companies prescribed by Rule 20 of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014, which covers every listed company and every company with a thousand or more members; section 110 requires the postal ballot for prescribed items of business.
The consequence is that the decision is no longer taken by the small number of members who can travel to the registered office, and the institutional investor who never attends now votes on every resolution. Regulation 44 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 requires the results to be published with the number of votes cast for and against each resolution, which has produced a public record of institutional dissent that did not exist before.
Two, the meeting has been dematerialised. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs permitted general meetings through video conferencing or other audio visual means by a series of general circulars from April 2020, repeatedly extended, and the Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 would put that on a statutory footing by permitting an annual general meeting by video conferencing subject to a physical meeting at least once every three years, and by reducing the notice period for a fully virtual extraordinary general meeting from twenty one days to seven. The Bill was introduced on 23 March 2026, was referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee which reported on 3 August 2026, and is not law; until it is, the position rests on the circulars.
Three, the substantive work has moved from the full Board to committees, and from the Board to the members. The audit committee under section 177, a majority of whose members and whose chairperson must be independent directors, now approves related party transactions, examines the financial statements and reviews the auditor's independence, and has the express power under section 177(4) to call for comments of the auditors and to investigate any matter referred to it.
Section 178 gives the nomination and remuneration committee the function of identifying persons qualified to become directors and formulating the criteria for evaluation. And at the members' level, section 188 now requires prior approval by resolution for related party transactions above prescribed thresholds, with the interested member not voting, which converts a decision that was once the Board's into one the disinterested shareholders take.
Four, what happens at the meeting has become public. Regulation 30 and Schedule III of the Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations require disclosure of material events including the outcome of Board meetings; Regulation 34 requires an annual report with a corporate governance report; section 134(3) requires the Board's report to state the number of Board meetings and to contain the Directors' Responsibility Statement; and section 118(10) requires every company to observe the secretarial standards on general and Board meetings specified by the Institute of Company Secretaries of India and approved by the Central Government, which is the only place in the Act where a professional body's standards are given statutory force in this field.
The honest assessment. These changes have made the meeting more representative and less deliberative. A resolution decided by remote electronic votes cast before the meeting opens cannot be affected by anything said at it, and the questions members ask are answered after the votes are in. The gain in participation is real and so is the loss, and the best answer says both. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Investments (P) Ltd., (2021) 9 SCC 449, is worth a closing sentence here, because it holds that a company may lawfully change its leadership through the processes its articles provide and that dissatisfaction with the outcome is not oppression: corporate governance regulates how the decision is taken, not what it should be.
Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Escorts Ltd., (1986) 1 SCC 264, decided on 19 December 1985, is the leading Indian case on the requisitioned meeting. The Life Insurance Corporation, holding a large stake in Escorts, requisitioned an extraordinary general meeting to remove several directors before the expiry of their terms and appoint others. The company resisted, arguing among other things that the Corporation, as an instrumentality of the State, must disclose the reasons for the resolutions it proposed.
The Supreme Court held that a shareholder, including a State instrumentality acting as a shareholder, has the same right as any other member to requisition a meeting and is not bound to disclose his motives; the duty to give an explanatory statement of material facts lies on the management in respect of business it brings, not on the requisitionists. The case is the practical guarantee behind section 100: the power to call a meeting would be worth nothing if the board could demand reasons first.
Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co. Ltd. v. Cuninghame, [1906] 2 Ch 34, settles the relationship between the two organs. The articles vested the management of the business in the directors. The general meeting passed an ordinary resolution directing them to sell the company undertaking, and they refused. The Court of Appeal held the resolution did not bind the directors: where the constitution has vested a power in the board, the members cannot exercise it or dictate its exercise by ordinary resolution, and their remedies are to alter the articles by special resolution under section 14 or to remove the directors under section 169. That is why section 179(1) is expressed as a grant to the Board of everything not reserved to the members, and why section 180 has to name expressly the four decisions the members keep.
Read together the two cases describe the constitutional settlement inside a company: the members control who the directors are and the largest decisions, and may summon a meeting without explaining themselves; the directors control the business and cannot be instructed on it. Everything in the law of meetings, from the notice period in section 101 to the quorum in section 103 and the majority in section 114, is machinery for working that settlement.
Conclusion. A meeting is the only means by which a company forms and expresses a will, and the Act regulates it through authority, notice, quorum, chairman and record. The kinds are the annual general meeting under section 96, the extraordinary general meeting under section 100, a meeting ordered by the Tribunal under section 98, Board meetings under section 173 with the committee and independent directors' meetings under sections 135, 177, 178 and Schedule IV, class meetings under section 48 and Tribunal-convened meetings of members and creditors under section 230.
Corporate governance has separated participation from attendance through sections 108 and 110, dematerialised the meeting itself, moved substantive scrutiny into committees under sections 177 and 178 and to disinterested shareholders under section 188, and made the proceedings public through the listing regulations and section 118(10).
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, as does the syllabus and module one of every subject.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.