munotes®

LLM Group 3 Law of Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law of Trademarks 2015 Question Paper with Solutions

Mumbai University Solved Question Papers

Law of Trademarks

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

LLM · Group 3 Law of Intellectual Property and Information Technology

2015 Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 13 September 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2015 examination.

The law in these answers is stated as at September 2026, and four changes date most textbooks on this subject. THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD NO LONGER EXISTS: section 21 of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 omitted sections 83 to 90 with 89A, and sections 92, 93, 95, 96, 99 and 100, of the Trade Marks Act with effect from 4 April 2021, so an appeal from the Registrar under section 91 now goes to the High Court, and an application for removal or rectification under section 47 or 57 goes to the Registrar or the High Court. THE TEXTILE CHAPTER IS GONE: Chapter X, sections 79 to 82, was omitted by section 7 of the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2010 with effect from 8 July 2013, the day Chapter IVA brought the Madrid Protocol into Indian law. THE OFFENCES WERE CUT DOWN ON 1 AUGUST 2024: the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 omitted sections 106, 108 and 109, turned the false representation of a mark as registered under section 107 into a penalty of one half per cent of turnover or five lakh rupees, whichever is less, imposed by an adjudicating officer under the new section 112A with an appeal under section 112B, and left sections 103 to 105, on applying false trade marks and selling goods that bear them, as they were; the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026 does not amend the Trade Marks Act at all. AND INDIA JOINED THE NICE AGREEMENT with effect from 7 September 2019, and the thirteenth edition of the Nice Classification has applied since 1 January 2026.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2015 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 100  ·  7 questions answered

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in iv

1.What is a Trade Mark? What are its functions? Explain the terms -[25]

  • (a) Service Mark
  • (b) Trade Name
  • (c) Collective Mark

Answer

For full marks, cover: four parts, and the question gives the order. First the DEFINITION in section 2(1)(zb) read with section 2(1)(m), taken apart element by element. Then the FUNCTIONS, which the definition itself names and the courts have enlarged. Then the three terms, each with its own statutory home: SERVICE MARK in section 2(1)(z), TRADE NAME in section 29(5) and section 35, and COLLECTIVE MARK in section 2(1)(g) and Chapter VIII. Close with a table that separates the three from an ordinary trade mark.

What the Act says a trade mark is

SECTION 2(1)(m) defines the raw material. A MARK includes a DEVICE, BRAND, HEADING, LABEL, TICKET, NAME, SIGNATURE, WORD, LETTER, NUMERAL, SHAPE OF GOODS, PACKAGING OR COMBINATION OF COLOURS OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF. The list is inclusive, which is why a sound can be a mark though it is not named.

munotes.in 1

SECTION 2(1)(zb) then says which marks are TRADE MARKS: a mark CAPABLE OF BEING REPRESENTED GRAPHICALLY and which is CAPABLE OF DISTINGUISHING THE GOODS OR SERVICES OF ONE PERSON FROM THOSE OF OTHERS, and which may include SHAPE OF GOODS, THEIR PACKAGING AND COMBINATION OF COLOURS. The definition adds two limbs. For the offences in Chapter XII, other than section 107, it means a registered trade mark or a mark used to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the goods or services and a person having the right as proprietor to use it. For every other provision, it means a mark USED OR PROPOSED TO BE USED to indicate that connection, either as proprietor or by way of PERMITTED USE.

Taken apart, the definition has four elements:

a MARK within section 2(1)(m); GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION, so that the Registry can record it and a searcher can find it, which is the element that decides the fate of non conventional marks; CAPACITY TO DISTINGUISH the goods or services of one person from those of others, the element that excludes the generic and the merely descriptive; and USE OR PROPOSED USE IN THE COURSE OF TRADE, indicating a trade connection with the person entitled.

munotes.in 2

SECTION 2(2)(a) adds that any reference to a trade mark includes a COLLECTIVE MARK and a CERTIFICATION TRADE MARK, and SECTION 2(2)(c) extends use to use in any physical or other relation to goods, and for services to use as part of any statement about their availability or performance.

The functions of a trade mark

The ORIGIN function. The definition itself states it: the mark indicates a CONNECTION IN THE COURSE OF TRADE between the goods and a particular person. The purchaser need not know who that person is. It is enough that the mark tells him that all goods bearing it come from ONE SOURCE. Power Control Appliances v. Sumeet Machines Pvt. Ltd., (1994) 2 SCC 448, states the principle in its sharpest form: there can be ONLY ONE MARK, ONE SOURCE AND ONE PROPRIETOR, and a mark cannot have two origins. A member of the Sumeet family who set up a rival business and claimed to be a joint owner was refused, because joint proprietors must use a mark together and never in rivalry.

munotes.in 3

The QUALITY or GUARANTEE function. A mark does not promise excellence, but it promises CONSISTENCY: the buyer of the second packet expects what he had in the first. That is why the law polices licensing. Under SECTION 48(2) the PERMITTED USE of a trade mark, by a registered user or by a person using it with the proprietor's written consent and under his control, is DEEMED TO BE USE BY THE PROPRIETOR, and the proprietor must keep that control, because a mark used by others without it no longer guarantees anything.

The ADVERTISING and INVESTMENT function. A mark is the vessel into which a business pours its advertising. Much of modern trade mark law, the protection of well known marks across classes under section 29(4) and section 11(2), and the refusal to let a rival take UNFAIR ADVANTAGE of or be DETRIMENTAL TO a mark's DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OR REPUTE, exists to protect that investment rather than to prevent confusion.

The IDENTIFICATION function in commerce beyond goods. Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Siffynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd., (2004) 6 SCC 145, shows how far the idea travels. The Supreme Court held that a DOMAIN NAME, which began as a mere address, now serves to IDENTIFY AND DISTINGUISH a business and its services, so that it has all the characteristics of a trade mark and a passing off action lies to protect it.

munotes.in 4

Service mark

The TRADE AND MERCHANDISE MARKS ACT, 1958 protected marks for GOODS only. A bank, a hotel chain or an airline had no registered right in its name and relied on passing off. The 1999 Act changed that, and it is one of the principal reasons the Act was passed.

SECTION 2(1)(z) defines SERVICE as service of any description which is made available to potential users, and includes services in connection with business of any industrial or commercial matters such as BANKING, COMMUNICATION, EDUCATION, FINANCING, INSURANCE, CHIT FUNDS, REAL ESTATE, TRANSPORT, STORAGE, BOARDING, LODGING, ENTERTAINMENT, CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR and ADVERTISING. A SERVICE MARK is simply a trade mark used in relation to services, and the definition in section 2(1)(zb) reaches it by its words GOODS OR SERVICES. Services fall in CLASSES 35 TO 45 of the international classification the Registry applies under section 7.

munotes.in 5

Two consequences follow. Use of a service mark is use as part of a statement about the availability, provision or performance of the services, under section 2(2)(c)(ii), so a mark on a hotel's signboard, booking website and invoices is in use though nothing is ever sold bearing it. And infringement reaches services: Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. v. B. Vijaya Sai, (2022) 5 SCC 1, restored a decree for the proprietor of RENAISSANCE for hotels against SAI RENAISSANCE, holding that where the mark and the services are identical or similar the governing provision is section 29(2) read with section 29(3), not the dilution provision in section 29(4).

Trade name

The Act does not define a TRADE NAME, but it uses the expression, and a student should locate it. A trade name is the NAME UNDER WHICH A BUSINESS IS CARRIED ON, as distinct from the mark applied to its goods. The two may coincide, as where a company's name is also its brand, or differ, as where a company with a corporate name sells under a dozen marks.

The law protects a trade name in four ways.

As a mark. A NAME is expressly within section 2(1)(m), so a trade name used as a mark can be registered as one.

munotes.in 6

Against a registered mark taken as a name. SECTION 29(5) provides that a registered trade mark is infringed by a person who uses it AS HIS TRADE NAME OR PART OF HIS TRADE NAME, or name of his business concern, dealing in the goods or services for which the mark is registered.

By passing off. Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah, (2002) 3 SCC 65, holds that a person may not carry on business under a name so closely resembling a rival's that ordinary people are likely to be misled; the plaintiff, who had run MUKTAJIVAN COLOUR LAB AND STUDIO in Ahmedabad since 1982, obtained an injunction without proving actual damage. Mahendra and Mahendra Paper Mills Ltd. v. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., (2002) 2 SCC 147, restrained a later corporate name on the strength of a name in continuous use since 1945.

And subject to honest use of one's own name. SECTION 35 saves ANY BONA FIDE USE by a person of HIS OWN NAME or that of his place of business. The saving protects the honest trader named Ruston who opens a shop; it does not protect a company that adopts a famous name and calls it its own.

munotes.in 7

Collective mark

SECTION 2(1)(g): a COLLECTIVE MARK is a trade mark DISTINGUISHING THE GOODS OR SERVICES OF MEMBERS OF AN ASSOCIATION OF PERSONS, not being a partnership, WHICH IS THE PROPRIETOR OF THE MARK, from those of others.

What it signifies is MEMBERSHIP. The buyer learns not that the goods come from one manufacturer but that the manufacturer belongs to a particular association, a guild of weavers, a cooperative of dairy farmers, a federation of accountants. CHAPTER VIII, sections 61 to 68, adapts the ordinary law to that function:

munotes.in 8

SECTION 61 reads the words "one person" in section 2(1)(zb) as the members of the proprietor association; SECTION 62 refuses a collective mark likely to be taken to be SOMETHING OTHER THAN A COLLECTIVE MARK, and lets the Registrar require an indication that it is one; SECTION 63 requires the application to be accompanied by REGULATIONS specifying the persons authorised to use the mark, the conditions of membership, the conditions of use and the SANCTIONS AGAINST MISUSE; SECTIONS 64 TO 66 make the regulations subject to the Registrar's acceptance, open to inspection and amendable only by filing and publication; SECTION 67 requires a court, in a suit by the proprietor, to take account of the loss suffered by AUTHORISED USERS; and SECTION 68 adds grounds of removal where the mark has become misleading as a collective mark or the proprietor has failed to secure observance of the regulations, and deems use by an authorised user to be use by the proprietor.

TermStatutory homeWhat it tells the buyerWho owns it
Trade marks.2(1)(zb)These goods come from one trade sourceThe proprietor
Service marks.2(1)(z) with s.2(1)(zb)This service comes from one sourceThe proprietor of the service business
munotes.in 9
TermStatutory homeWhat it tells the buyerWho owns it
Trade names.2(1)(m), s.29(5), s.35This is the business I am dealing withThe person trading under it
Collective marks.2(1)(g), ss.61 to 68The trader belongs to this associationThe association, used by its members
munotes.in 10

Conclusion. A TRADE MARK under SECTION 2(1)(zb) is a MARK within section 2(1)(m) which is CAPABLE OF GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION, CAPABLE OF DISTINGUISHING the goods or services of one person from those of others, and USED OR PROPOSED TO BE USED to indicate a connection in the course of trade. Its functions are to identify ORIGIN, on the principle of one mark, one source and one proprietor in Power Control Appliances v. Sumeet Machines Pvt. Ltd.; to guarantee CONSISTENCY of quality; to carry ADVERTISING and INVESTMENT, which the dilution provisions protect; and to IDENTIFY A BUSINESS in any medium, a domain name included after Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Siffynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd.. A SERVICE MARK is a trade mark for SERVICES as defined in SECTION 2(1)(z), first registrable under the 1999 Act. A TRADE NAME, undefined but used in SECTION 29(5), is the name under which a business is carried on, protected against infringement by section 29(5), by passing off as in Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah, and subject to honest use of one's own name under SECTION 35. A COLLECTIVE MARK under SECTION 2(1)(g) distinguishes the goods or services of MEMBERS OF AN ASSOCIATION which owns it, and is governed by REGULATIONS under SECTIONS 61 TO 68.

munotes.in 11

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest come with the LL.M. Intellectual Property and Information Technology Semester 2 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in

Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499

The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!