munotes®

LLM Group 3 Law of Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law of Trademarks 2025-26 - Set 2 Question Paper with Solutions

Mumbai University Solved Question Papers

Law of Trademarks

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

LLM · Group 3 Law of Intellectual Property and Information Technology

2025-26 - Set 2 Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 13 September 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2025-26 - Set 2 examination.

The law in these answers is stated as at September 2026, and four changes date most textbooks on this subject. THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD NO LONGER EXISTS: section 21 of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 omitted sections 83 to 90 with 89A, and sections 92, 93, 95, 96, 99 and 100, of the Trade Marks Act with effect from 4 April 2021, so an appeal from the Registrar under section 91 now goes to the High Court, and an application for removal or rectification under section 47 or 57 goes to the Registrar or the High Court. THE TEXTILE CHAPTER IS GONE: Chapter X, sections 79 to 82, was omitted by section 7 of the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2010 with effect from 8 July 2013, the day Chapter IVA brought the Madrid Protocol into Indian law. THE OFFENCES WERE CUT DOWN ON 1 AUGUST 2024: the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 omitted sections 106, 108 and 109, turned the false representation of a mark as registered under section 107 into a penalty of one half per cent of turnover or five lakh rupees, whichever is less, imposed by an adjudicating officer under the new section 112A with an appeal under section 112B, and left sections 103 to 105, on applying false trade marks and selling goods that bear them, as they were; the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026 does not amend the Trade Marks Act at all. AND INDIA JOINED THE NICE AGREEMENT with effect from 7 September 2019, and the thirteenth edition of the Nice Classification has applied since 1 January 2026.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2025-26 - Set 2 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 100  ·  7 questions answered

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in iv

1.Discuss the powers, functions and jurisdiction of the Registrar of Trade Marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Analyse the quasi-judicial powers exercised by the Registrar.[25]

Answer

For full marks, cover: three descriptive heads, POWERS, FUNCTIONS and JURISDICTION, and then an ANALYSIS. The analysis is what distinguishes this question: explain what makes a power QUASI JUDICIAL, show that the Registrar's powers in opposition, rectification and the like have those features, identify the safeguards the Act builds in, and assess how the courts supervise him. Use Ashok Chandra Rakhit for the nature of his discretion and Patel Field Marshal for the relation between his jurisdiction and the courts'.

munotes.in 1

Who the Registrar is

SECTION 3(1): the Central Government appoints the CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS, DESIGNS AND TRADE MARKS, WHO SHALL BE THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS. Under SECTION 3(2) other officers discharge such of his functions as he authorises, UNDER HIS SUPERINTENDENCE AND DIRECTION, and SECTION 2(2)(d) makes a reference to the Registrar include any such officer. SECTION 4 lets the Registrar WITHDRAW a matter from an officer, BY WRITTEN ORDER WITH REASONS, and decide it himself or TRANSFER it, de novo or from the stage reached.

Jurisdiction

Territorial jurisdiction. The TRADE MARKS REGISTRY, continued by SECTION 5, has its HEAD OFFICE at MUMBAI and BRANCH OFFICES at DELHI, KOLKATA, CHENNAI AND AHMEDABAD, each exercising functions within territorial limits notified by the Central Government. RULE 4 fixes the APPROPRIATE OFFICE by the applicant's PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IN INDIA, or for a foreign applicant by his ADDRESS FOR SERVICE, and SECTION 18(3) requires applications to be filed there; a later change of place of business does not move an existing mark under RULE 5. International applications and designations under the Madrid Protocol go to the head office or a notified branch under SECTION 36C.

munotes.in 2

Subject matter jurisdiction, exclusive. Only the Registrar decides APPLICATIONS for registration under SECTION 18, OPPOSITIONS under SECTION 21, applications by COLLECTIVE AND CERTIFICATION mark proprietors under SECTIONS 64 AND 71 TO 74, REGISTERED USER applications under SECTIONS 49 AND 50, CORRECTION of the register under SECTION 58, ALTERATION of marks under SECTION 59, RENEWAL AND RESTORATION under SECTION 25, and applications for PRELIMINARY ADVICE on distinctiveness under SECTION 133.

Subject matter jurisdiction, shared with the High Court. REMOVAL FOR NON USE under SECTION 47 and RECTIFICATION under SECTION 57 lie to the Registrar OR the HIGH COURT, and SECTION 125(2) lets the Registrar REFER a rectification application to the High Court at any stage.

Where his jurisdiction ends. He has NO JURISDICTION over INFRINGEMENT OR PASSING OFF suits, which lie to a District Court or above under SECTION 134. Where the validity of a registration is questioned in an infringement suit, SECTION 125(1) sends the rectification application to the HIGH COURT, not the Registrar. And every order he makes is subject to APPEAL to the HIGH COURT under SECTION 91.

munotes.in 3

Functions

Record keeping. Maintaining the REGISTER OF TRADE MARKS at the head office under SECTION 6, electronically if need be, without notice of trusts; making the register and documents available for INSPECTION and issuing CERTIFIED COPIES under SECTION 148, which are admissible without further proof under SECTION 137.

Classification. Classifying goods and services according to the INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION under SECTION 7, his decision on class being FINAL, and publishing the ALPHABETICAL INDEX under SECTION 8.

Examination and registration. Examining applications, searching earlier marks and issuing EXAMINATION REPORTS under RULE 33; accepting or refusing under SECTION 18(4); ADVERTISING under SECTION 20; REGISTERING and issuing CERTIFICATES under SECTION 23.

Maintenance. RENEWAL, removal for non renewal and RESTORATION under SECTION 25; recording ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSMISSIONS under SECTION 45.

Special marks and lists. Notifying INTERNATIONAL NON PROPRIETARY NAMES under SECTION 13; determining and listing WELL KNOWN TRADE MARKS under RULE 124; considering REGULATIONS for collective and certification marks.

munotes.in 4

International. Transmitting international applications under SECTION 36D and examining international registrations designating India under SECTION 36E.

Enforcement support. Giving his OPINION to the police before search and seizure under SECTION 115(4), making complaints where the Act requires, and authorising ADJUDICATING OFFICERS to impose the penalty under SECTION 107, under SECTION 112A.

Powers

Civil court powers: section 127(a). In all proceedings before him, the powers of a CIVIL COURT for RECEIVING EVIDENCE, ADMINISTERING OATHS, ENFORCING THE ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES, COMPELLING DISCOVERY AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS and ISSUING COMMISSIONS.

Costs: section 127(b). To award COSTS executable as a DECREE, on the scale in the Rules.

Review: section 127(c). To REVIEW HIS OWN DECISION on application.

Discretion subject to hearing: section 128. No discretionary or other power may be exercised ADVERSELY to an applicant WITHOUT AN OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD, if asked for within time.

munotes.in 5

Evidence: section 129. Evidence BY AFFIDAVIT, with power to take ORAL EVIDENCE.

Time and default: sections 131 and 132. To EXTEND TIME not fixed by the Act, without hearing and without appeal; and to treat an application as ABANDONED for default after notice.

Own motion rectification: section 57(4). To make any order under section 57(1) or (2) OF HIS OWN MOTION, after notice and hearing.

Refusal with reasons: section 18(5). In a refusal or conditional acceptance, to RECORD IN WRITING the grounds and the materials used.

Analysis: the quasi judicial powers

What makes a power quasi judicial. An administrative authority exercises a QUASI JUDICIAL power when it decides a question affecting rights, on evidence, according to law, where there is a DUTY TO ACT JUDICIALLY: typically a contest between parties, a proposition and opposition, findings of fact, application of legal standards and a reasoned decision. Such a power attracts the PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE even where the statute does not spell them out.

munotes.in 6

The Registrar's quasi judicial powers. Measured by that test, the Registrar acts quasi judicially when he:

decides OPPOSITIONS under SECTION 21, a contest between applicant and opponent on pleadings, affidavit evidence and a hearing; decides applications for REMOVAL under SECTION 47 and RECTIFICATION under SECTION 57, where a person aggrieved seeks to take away a registered right; REFUSES or CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTS an application under SECTION 18(4), which affects the applicant's claim to a statutory right; permits registration on HONEST CONCURRENT USE under SECTION 12, balancing the rights of two traders; VARIES OR CANCELS a registered user under SECTION 50; RESTORES a removed mark under SECTION 25(4), having regard to others' interests; approves or certifies ASSIGNMENTS under SECTIONS 40 AND 41; and REVIEWS his own decisions under SECTION 127(c).

The features that prove it. The Act gives these proceedings every hallmark of adjudication. There are PARTIES and PLEADINGS (notice of opposition, counterstatement). There is EVIDENCE, by affidavit under SECTION 129, with the powers of a civil court over witnesses and documents under SECTION 127(a). There is a HEARING, guaranteed by SECTION 128 and regulated by RULE 50. There are REASONS, required by SECTION 18(5). There are COSTS under SECTION 127(b). And there is an APPEAL to the High Court under SECTION 91.

munotes.in 7

The courts treat his discretion as judicial. Registrar of Trade Marks v. Ashok Chandra Rakhit Ltd., AIR 1955 SC 558, decided on the disclaimer power in the Trade Marks Act, 1940, holds that the Registrar's discretion must be exercised NOT CAPRICIOUSLY OR ARBITRARILY but ACCORDING TO SOUND PRINCIPLES governing all judicial discretion, and restored his disclaimer of the common word SHREE because the High Court had not weighed the consideration that justified it. Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta, AIR 1963 SC 449, restored the Registrar's reasoned order permitting LAKSHMANDHARA to be registered for Uttar Pradesh only, on his finding of acquiescence, showing that the superior courts respect a properly reasoned exercise of his discretion.

His decisions do not bind the civil courts, and theirs do not bind him. National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd. v. James Chadwick and Bros. Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 357, held that the considerations in a PASSING OFF action are not the same as those on an APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION, so a passing off judgment between the same parties was not conclusive in the registration proceedings. Each forum decides the question the statute gives it.

munotes.in 8

His rectification jurisdiction is the same as the court's. Patel Field Marshal Agencies v. P.M. Diesels Ltd., AIR 2017 SC 5619, decided on the corresponding provisions of the 1958 Act, holds that the rectification jurisdiction of the tribunal and the jurisdiction exercised when invalidity is raised in a suit are ONE JURISDICTION under two procedures that do NOT RUN IN PARALLEL. The Registrar's rectification power is therefore a true adjudicatory power, integrated with the civil courts' work.

Safeguards, and their limits. The quasi judicial model protects parties through hearing, reasons and appeal. But it has limits worth noting critically. The Registrar is an ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, appointed and controlled by the executive, not a judge. His officers carry heavy caseloads. Extensions of time under SECTION 131 are unappealable and may be granted without hearing. And his REVIEW power under section 127(c) sits alongside the right of appeal, which requires care to prevent duplicate proceedings. The APPEAL to the HIGH COURT under SECTION 91, and the High Court's WRIT jurisdiction under ARTICLE 226, are the ultimate guarantees that his quasi judicial powers are exercised lawfully.

munotes.in 9
PowerProvisionQuasi judicial?
Classifications.7Administrative, but final
Examination and acceptance or refusals.18(4), (5)Yes, with reasons
Oppositions.21Yes, inter partes
Honest concurrent uses.12Yes
Removal and rectificationss.47, 57Yes, shared with High Court
Registered usersss.49, 50Yes on cancellation
Restorations.25(4)Yes, regard to others
Reviews.127(c)Yes
Civil court powers and costss.127(a), (b)Incidents of adjudication
Hearings.128Safeguard
munotes.in 10

Conclusion. The REGISTRAR, who is the CONTROLLER GENERAL under SECTION 3(1), acting through officers under SECTIONS 3(2) AND 4, exercises TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION through the head office at MUMBAI and branches at DELHI, KOLKATA, CHENNAI AND AHMEDABAD under SECTION 5 and RULE 4, EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction over applications, oppositions, registered users, correction, renewal and restoration, and jurisdiction SHARED with the HIGH COURT over removal and rectification under SECTIONS 47 AND 57, but none over infringement suits, and none over validity raised in a suit under SECTION 125. His FUNCTIONS are keeping the REGISTER, CLASSIFICATION, EXAMINATION, ADVERTISEMENT, REGISTRATION, RENEWAL, RECORDING TRANSFERS, WELL KNOWN MARK DETERMINATIONS, MADRID work and enforcement support.

munotes.in 11

His POWERS are those of a CIVIL COURT over evidence and witnesses, COSTS and REVIEW under SECTION 127, subject to a HEARING under SECTION 128, with affidavit evidence, extension of time, abandonment and own motion rectification. His QUASI JUDICIAL powers, in opposition, rectification, removal, refusal, concurrent use, registered users and restoration, carry every hallmark of adjudication, parties, pleadings, evidence, hearing, reasons, costs and appeal, and the Supreme Court treats his discretion as JUDICIAL in Registrar of Trade Marks v. Ashok Chandra Rakhit Ltd., respects his reasoned orders in Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta, separates his task from the civil courts' in National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd. v. James Chadwick and Bros. Ltd., and treats his rectification jurisdiction as one with the courts' in Patel Field Marshal Agencies v. P.M. Diesels Ltd., all subject to APPEAL to the HIGH COURT under SECTION 91.

munotes.in 12

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest are part of LL.M. Intellectual Property and Information Technology Semester 2.

You have read the paper as it was set and the first model answer in full. The remaining answers come with the bundle, along with every other solved paper for this semester.

See the semester for ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in

Or just the solved papers: ₹499

The question paper itself stays free, as does the syllabus and module one of every subject.

Report or request

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!