Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Law of Patents
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 3 Law of Intellectual Property and Information Technology
2016 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Law of Patents
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 3 Law of Intellectual Property and Information Technology
2016 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 13 September 2026.
This edition revised 14 September 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2016 examination.
The law in these answers is stated as at September 2026, and four things date every textbook on this subject. THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD NO LONGER EXISTS: the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 omitted sections 116, 117, 117B, 117C and 117D of the Patents Act and substituted HIGH COURT for Appellate Board in section 117A, so appeals from the Controller and revocation petitions under section 64 now lie to the High Court, which is why the Delhi High Court framed its Intellectual Property Rights Division Rules in 2022. THE PENAL CHAPTER HAS BEEN CUT DOWN TWICE: the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 took effect for this Act on 1 August 2024 and turned sections 120, 122(1), 122(2) and 123 into PENALTIES imposed by an adjudicating officer under a new section 124A with an appeal under section 124B, omitting section 121 altogether; and the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026, passed on 2 April 2026, took effect for this Act on 1 JUNE 2026, OMITTING SECTION 119 on falsification of the register in its entirety and adding a proviso to section 118 which, in the case of a contravention of section 39 only, disapplies it where in the opinion of the Central Government the invention was not relevant for defence purpose or atomic energy, so that section 118 is now the ONLY substantive criminal offence left in the Patents Act. THERE IS NO PATENT AMENDMENT ACT OF 2016, although one paper in this folder asks for its crucial features: the last amending Act is the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, and 2016 produced the Patents (Amendment) Rules, which introduced expedited examination and the startup category. AND THE RULES HAVE MOVED AGAIN: the Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2024, in force 15 March 2024, cut the time for requesting examination from forty eight months to thirty one, made the Form 27 statement of working triennial instead of annual, and codified the divisional application practice settled by the Division Bench in Syngenta Limited v. Controller of Patents and Designs on 13 October 2023.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2016 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2016 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 6 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: THREE demands, and the third is the longest. Give the definition and the three requirements compactly, because the last sentence of the question asks for the whole grant procedure and that is where the bulk of the marks sit. Write the procedure as a numbered sequence from the person entitled to apply to post-grant opposition, with the section against every step, and include the two timing changes made by the 2016 and 2024 Rules, which no textbook printed before 2024 contains.
Section 2(1)(j). "Invention" means A NEW PRODUCT OR PROCESS INVOLVING AN INVENTIVE STEP AND CAPABLE OF INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION. The three requirements are contained in that sentence.
NOVELTY. Section 2(1)(l) defines a "new invention" as one NOT ANTICIPATED BY PUBLICATION IN ANY DOCUMENT OR USED IN THE COUNTRY OR ELSEWHERE IN THE WORLD before the date of filing, that is to say the subject matter has not fallen into the PUBLIC DOMAIN or formed part of the STATE OF THE ART. The standard is ABSOLUTE: publication or use anywhere in the world destroys novelty. It is tested by the examiner under section 13, and sections 29 to 34 preserve the applicant in the limited cases of publication without consent, communication to Government, a notified exhibition or a learned society paper followed by an application within twelve months, and public working for reasonable trial.
INVENTIVE STEP. Section 2(1)(ja): a FEATURE OF AN INVENTION involving TECHNICAL ADVANCE as compared to existing knowledge OR HAVING ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OR BOTH, and making the invention NOT OBVIOUS TO A PERSON SKILLED IN THE ART. The second limb is indispensable. Bishwanath Prasad Radhey Shyam v. Hindustan Metal Industries, (1979) 2 SCC 511, asks whether the thing lies SO MUCH OUT OF THE TRACK of what was known as not naturally to suggest itself, and whether it is a mere WORKSHOP IMPROVEMENT a skilled workman could reach without inventive faculty.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION. Section 2(1)(ac): capable of being MADE OR USED IN AN INDUSTRY. It excludes what cannot work at all, which is why section 3(a) refuses anything contrary to well established natural laws.
And the negative requirement. Passing all three is not enough. SECTION 3 keeps seventeen categories outside the concept of invention and SECTION 4 bars atomic energy. Novartis AG v. Union of India, (2013) 6 SCC 1, called section 3(d) a SECOND TIER OF QUALIFYING STANDARDS for pharmaceutical substances, holding that efficacy there means THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY.
Step 1: who may apply, section 6. The TRUE AND FIRST INVENTOR, his ASSIGNEE, or the LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE of a deceased person who was entitled to apply. Section 2(1)(y) excludes from "true and first inventor" the first IMPORTER of an invention into India and the person to whom it was first COMMUNICATED FROM OUTSIDE INDIA, so bringing a foreign invention home is not inventing it.
Step 2: where and how, sections 7 and 9. An application in the prescribed form is filed at the appropriate office of the four, with either a PROVISIONAL or a COMPLETE specification. A provisional secures a PRIORITY DATE and must be followed by a complete specification WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS, failing which the application is DEEMED ABANDONED under section 9(1). A declaration as to inventorship is required by section 10(6), and section 8 requires a statement and undertaking about applications for the same invention filed OUTSIDE INDIA, which must be kept updated.
Step 3: publication, section 11A. No application is open to the public before EIGHTEEN MONTHS from the date of filing or priority, whichever is earlier, after which the Controller publishes it. Early publication may be requested. From publication the applicant has LIKE PRIVILEGES AND RIGHTS as if the patent had been granted, but section 11A(7) forbids any proceedings for infringement until grant.
Step 4: request for examination, section 11B. No application is examined unless a REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION is filed. The period was FORTY EIGHT MONTHS from priority or filing and was CUT TO THIRTY ONE MONTHS by the PATENTS (AMENDMENT) RULES, 2024, in force 15 March 2024. Rule 24C provides EXPEDITED EXAMINATION, introduced by the Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2016 with effect from 16 May 2016, available to a STARTUP, a small entity, a female applicant, a government undertaking, an applicant eligible under a patent prosecution highway arrangement, or one who chose the Indian Patent Office as his international searching authority.
Step 5: examination, sections 12 and 13. The Controller refers the application to an EXAMINER, who reports whether the application and specification comply with the Act, whether there is lawful ground of objection, and whether the invention has been ANTICIPATED by publication in any earlier Indian specification or in any document published anywhere, or CLAIMED in another complete specification of earlier priority.
Step 6: the first examination report and putting the application in order, section 21. The objections are communicated as a FIRST EXAMINATION REPORT. The application must be PUT IN ORDER FOR GRANT within the prescribed period, which the 2016 Rules REDUCED FROM TWELVE MONTHS TO SIX, extendable by three on request. Failure means the application is DEEMED ABANDONED. Under the 2024 Rules the section 8 information is to be furnished within three months of the report.
Step 7: the Controller's powers on the application, sections 15 to 20. He may REFUSE the application or require amendment under section 15; allow a DIVISIONAL application under section 16, clarified by rule 13(2A) inserted in 2024; DATE or POST-DATE under section 17; deal with ANTICIPATION under sections 18 and 19; and direct SUBSTITUTION OF APPLICANTS under section 20. Section 80 requires him to give a HEARING before exercising any discretion adversely.
Step 8: pre-grant opposition, section 25(1). After publication and before grant, ANY PERSON may oppose by written representation on the eleven statutory grounds. Since the 2024 Rules the Controller must first decide the MAINTAINABILITY of the representation.
Step 9: grant, sections 43 and 45. Where the application is in order the patent is GRANTED, sealed and published, and the DATE OF THE PATENT is the DATE OF FILING, not the date of grant.
Step 10: after grant. POST-GRANT OPPOSITION by a person interested within TWELVE MONTHS of publication of the grant under section 25(2), before an OPPOSITION BOARD. RENEWAL FEES under section 53(2) to keep the patent alive for TWENTY YEARS FROM FILING. A statement of working in FORM 27 under section 146(2), now due ONCE EVERY THREE FINANCIAL YEARS. And an APPEAL under section 117A to the HIGH COURT within three months, the Appellate Board having been abolished in 2021.
It is worth noticing that most applications that fail are never REFUSED at all. Section 11B(4) deems an application WITHDRAWN if no request for examination is filed in time. Section 9(1) deems it ABANDONED if a complete specification does not follow a provisional within twelve months. And section 21(1) deems it abandoned if it is not put in order for grant within the period allowed after the first examination report. In each case the applicant has simply run out of time, there is no appealable order, and nothing can be done except to file afresh, by which time his own publication will usually have destroyed novelty.
Dates make the procedure intelligible, so work one through. An applicant files a complete specification on 10 JANUARY 2026. His PRIORITY DATE is 10 January 2026 and, if he is granted a patent, its TERM will run to 9 January 2046 under section 53.
The application is not open to the public until EIGHTEEN MONTHS have passed, so it is published in about JULY 2027 unless early publication is requested. Nothing is examined until he files a REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION, and under the 2024 Rules he has THIRTY ONE MONTHS from priority, that is until about AUGUST 2028; before 15 March 2024 he would have had forty eight months, until January 2030. If he misses it the application is deemed WITHDRAWN.
The examiner's report reaches him as a FIRST EXAMINATION REPORT, and from its issue he has SIX MONTHS, extendable by three, to put the application in order under section 21. Before the 2016 Rules he had twelve. During this whole period, from publication to grant, ANY PERSON may file a PRE-GRANT OPPOSITION under section 25(1), and the Controller must now first decide whether it is maintainable.
If the patent is granted, a PERSON INTERESTED may oppose within TWELVE MONTHS of the publication of the grant under section 25(2). Renewal fees fall due to keep the patent alive to 2046, the first FORM 27 statement of working is due in the triennial cycle under the 2024 Rules, and any appeal from the Controller lies to the HIGH COURT within three months under section 117A.
Conclusion. An INVENTION under section 2(1)(j) is a NEW PRODUCT OR PROCESS INVOLVING AN INVENTIVE STEP AND CAPABLE OF INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION. NOVELTY under section 2(1)(l) is absolute and measured against publication or use anywhere in the world; INVENTIVE STEP under section 2(1)(ja) requires technical advance or economic significance AND non-obviousness to the person skilled in the art, tested as in Bishwanath Prasad Radhey Shyam v. Hindustan Metal Industries; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION under section 2(1)(ac) requires only capability of being made or used in an industry; and sections 3 and 4 exclude whole classes besides, Novartis AG v. Union of India describing section 3(d) as a second tier. REGISTRATION runs from an application by the TRUE AND FIRST INVENTOR under section 6, with a provisional or complete specification under sections 7 and 9, publication at EIGHTEEN MONTHS under section 11A, a REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION now within THIRTY ONE MONTHS under section 11B, examination under sections 12 and 13, a first examination report to be answered within SIX MONTHS, pre-grant opposition under section 25(1), GRANT under section 43 dated back to filing, post-grant opposition within twelve months under section 25(2), renewal for TWENTY YEARS, triennial FORM 27 statements, and appeal to the HIGH COURT under section 117A.
The rest of the answers
You have read the paper as it was set and the first model answer in full. The remaining answers come with the bundle, along with every other solved paper for this semester.
See the semester for ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or just the solved papers: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, as does the syllabus and module one of every subject.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.