Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Copyrights Law and other related rights
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 3 Law of Intellectual Property and Information Technology
2025-26 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Copyrights Law and other related rights
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLM · Group 3 Law of Intellectual Property and Information Technology
2025-26 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 12 September 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2025-26 examination.
The law in these answers is stated as at September 2026, and five things date every textbook on this subject. THE COPYRIGHT BOARD NO LONGER EXISTS: it was merged into the Intellectual Property Appellate Board by the Finance Act, 2017 with effect from 26 May 2017, and that Board was abolished by the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, so the licensing and rate fixing jurisdiction under sections 31 to 32B, assignment disputes under section 19A, tariff appeals under section 33A, rectification under section 50 and appeals under section 72 now lie to the Commercial Court. Section 25 was OMITTED by the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 with effect from 21 June 2012, and the words other than a photograph were removed from section 22, so a photograph now takes the author's life plus sixty years and not sixty years from publication. India ACCEDED to the WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty on 25 September 2018, and remains outside the Rome and Brussels Conventions. The Bombay High Court held on 23 April 2019 in Tips Industries Limited v. Wynk Music Limited that the statutory broadcasting licence in section 31D does not reach internet streaming, and the contrary departmental memorandum of 2016 was withdrawn on 21 August 2024. And the Act has NOT been amended since 2012: the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade published a working paper on generative artificial intelligence and copyright on 8 December 2025, and the Delhi High Court refused an interim injunction in ANI Media Private Limited v. OpenAI on 24 July 2026.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2025-26 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2025-26 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 7 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: three definitions and the examiner has numbered them for you. Take "work" from section 2(y) and then open each of the three limbs with its own definition, because the marks are in the sub-definitions and not in the two-line parent. Add the conditions in section 13 without which no copyright subsists at all, and the originality requirement with its case. Then "publication" from section 3, which is shorter than candidates expect and wider than they expect. Then first publication in India from section 5, where the THIRTY DAY rule is the answer the examiner is looking for. Close by explaining why all three definitions matter in practice, which is that they decide protection, term and territory.
Section 2(y) defines "work" exhaustively. It means any of the following works, namely:
(i) a LITERARY, DRAMATIC, MUSICAL or ARTISTIC work; (ii) a CINEMATOGRAPH FILM; (iii) a SOUND RECORDING.
The definition is closed. Anything that is not within one of these three limbs is not a work, and no copyright can subsist in it however valuable or original it is. That is why the first step in any copyright problem is classification, and why arguments about new subject matter are always arguments about whether it fits an existing limb.
Section 13(1) then provides that copyright shall subsist throughout India in (a) ORIGINAL literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, (b) cinematograph films, and (c) sound recordings. Note that the word "original" governs only the first class in the text, although the Delhi High Court held in MRF Limited v. Metro Tyres Limited, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8973, decided 1 May 2019, that a cinematograph film must itself be original to attract copyright.
Literary work, section 2(o). "Literary work" INCLUDES computer programmes, tables and compilations including computer databases. The definition is inclusive rather than exhaustive, so it extends to the ordinary meaning as well: books, articles, letters, lyrics, question papers, computer code. Literary merit is irrelevant; a railway timetable and a betting coupon are literary works.
Dramatic work, section 2(h). It includes any piece for recitation, choreographic work or entertainment in dumb show, the scenic arrangement or acting form of which is FIXED IN WRITING OR OTHERWISE, but DOES NOT INCLUDE a cinematograph film. Two features follow: fixation is required, unlike for a literary work; and a film is excluded because it is separately protected under limb (ii).
Musical work, section 2(p). A work consisting of MUSIC, and it includes any graphical notation of such work, but DOES NOT INCLUDE any words or any action intended to be sung, spoken or performed with the music. The lyric is therefore a separate literary work with a separate author and a separate term, which is why film music generates so much litigation.
Artistic work, section 2(c). It means (i) a painting, sculpture, drawing including a diagram, map, chart or plan, an engraving or a photograph, WHETHER OR NOT ANY SUCH WORK POSSESSES ARTISTIC QUALITY; (ii) a work of architecture; and (iii) any other work of ARTISTIC CRAFTSMANSHIP. The italicised words are the important ones: aesthetic merit is irrelevant to a painting or a drawing, but a work of artistic craftsmanship under limb (iii) must have some artistic character, which is why the limb is narrowly construed.
Cinematograph film, section 2(f). Any work of VISUAL RECORDING, and it includes a sound recording accompanying such visual recording; "cinematograph" is to be construed as including any work produced by any process analogous to cinematography, including video films. The definition was widened in 2012 from "visual recording on any medium" to "visual recording", so the medium is now irrelevant and digital production is plainly covered.
Sound recording, section 2(xx). A recording of sounds from which such sounds may be produced, REGARDLESS OF THE MEDIUM on which the recording is made or the method by which the sounds are produced. So the right attaches to the recording, not to the disc.
A work may fall squarely within section 2(y) and still attract no copyright. Section 13 imposes four further conditions and they are regularly missed.
Section 13(2), the connecting factor. Copyright does not subsist unless: in the case of a PUBLISHED work, it is first published in India, or where first published outside India, the author was at the date of publication, or at death if he had died, a CITIZEN OF INDIA; in the case of an UNPUBLISHED work other than architecture, the author was at the date of making a citizen of or domiciled in India; and in the case of ARCHITECTURE, the work is located in India. Sections 40 and 41 allow the Central Government to extend protection to foreign works, and the International Copyright Order, 1999 does so for the works of nationals of Berne, Universal Copyright Convention and World Trade Organization member States.
Section 13(3), the derivative bar. Copyright does not subsist in a cinematograph film if a substantial part of the film is an infringement of the copyright in any other work, nor in a sound recording made in respect of a literary, dramatic or musical work if in making it the copyright in that work has been infringed. A pirate cannot acquire copyright in the product of his piracy.
Section 13(4), the layering rule. The copyright in a film or a sound recording does NOT affect the separate copyright in any work in respect of which the film or recording is made. So a song on a record involves at least four copyrights: the lyric, the composition, the sound recording and, if filmed, the film.
Section 13(5), architecture. Copyright in a work of architecture subsists only in the artistic character and design, and does not extend to processes or methods of construction.
Section 13(1)(a) requires literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works to be ORIGINAL. The Act does not define originality.
The classical statement is University of London Press Ltd v. University Tutorial Press Ltd, [1916] 2 Ch 601: the word original does not require that the work be the expression of original or inventive thought; copyright is concerned not with the originality of ideas but with the expression of thought, and what is required is that the work should not be COPIED but should ORIGINATE from the author.
The modern Indian standard is Eastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak, (2008) 1 SCC 1. Publishers of copy-edited law reports complained that their reports had been reproduced on CD-ROM. The Supreme Court rejected both the English "sweat of the brow" test, which would protect mere labour, and the American requirement of novelty, and adopted a middle position: originality requires a MINIMAL DEGREE OF CREATIVITY, which is skill and judgment and not merely capital, labour and effort. Applying it, no copyright subsisted in the raw text of the judgments, which are government works in the public domain under section 52(1)(q), but copyright did subsist in the publishers' own additions, including paragraph numbering, the division of opinions and the notation of which judges concurred.
A related limit is Krishika Lulla v. Shyam Vithalrao Devkatta, (2016) 2 SCC 521, where the Supreme Court held that there is NO COPYRIGHT IN THE TITLE of a work standing by itself, because a title is not a work in which copyright can subsist; protection for a title, if any, lies in passing off or trade mark law.
Section 3 defines publication in one sentence: "publication" means making a work AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC by issue of copies or by COMMUNICATING THE WORK TO THE PUBLIC.
Three points follow. It does not require sale, so free distribution publishes. It does not require that anyone actually take a copy; availability suffices, and section 2(ff) defines communication to the public as making a work available for being seen or heard or otherwise enjoyed by the public directly or by any means of display or diffusion, WHETHER OR NOT ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC ACTUALLY SEES, HEARS OR OTHERWISE ENJOYS IT. And because communication to the public is a mode of publication, an upload to a publicly accessible website publishes the work.
Section 4 is the qualification. A work shall not be deemed to be published or performed in public if it is published or performed in public WITHOUT THE LICENCE of the owner of the copyright. So a pirate cannot publish an author's work for the purposes of the Act, which matters because publication starts the term running for several classes of work and fixes the connecting factor under section 13(2).
Section 5 answers the examiner's third limb.
A work shall be deemed to be FIRST PUBLISHED IN INDIA notwithstanding that it has been published SIMULTANEOUSLY in some other country, UNLESS that country by its law grants a SHORTER TERM of copyright for such work. So simultaneous publication abroad does not displace Indian first publication unless the other country is less generous.
The explanation supplies the test of simultaneity: a work shall be deemed to be published simultaneously in India and in another country if the time between the publication in India and the publication in the other country does not exceed THIRTY DAYS, or such other period as the Central Government may in relation to any specified country determine.
The rule matters for two reasons. It decides whether the section 13(2)(i) connecting factor is satisfied for a published work whose author is not an Indian citizen. And it governs the interaction with the Berne Convention, whose Article 3 uses the country of first publication as a point of attachment and whose Article 5(4) defines the country of origin by reference to it.
| Question | Provision | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| Is it a work at all? | Section 2(y) | Only if within one of three limbs |
| Which class? | Sections 2(o), 2(h), 2(p), 2(c), 2(f), 2(xx) | Decides the rights in section 14 and the term |
| Is it original? | Section 13(1)(a) | Minimal creativity: Eastern Book Company |
| Is there a connection with India? | Section 13(2) | First publication in India, or Indian author, or located in India |
| Has it been published? | Section 3, read with section 4 | Availability to the public, lawfully |
| Was it first published in India? | Section 5 | Yes, unless simultaneous publication abroad in a shorter term country; thirty days for simultaneity |
Classification under section 2(y) decides which bundle of rights in section 14 the owner has, and the rights differ markedly by class. Publication under section 3 starts the term running for films, sound recordings, photographs, anonymous and pseudonymous works and posthumous works under sections 25 to 29, whereas for ordinary literary works the term runs from the author's death under section 22. And first publication under section 5, with the connecting factors in section 13(2) and the International Copyright Order, decides whether Indian copyright exists at all for a foreign work.
Conclusion. "Work" is defined exhaustively in section 2(y) as a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, a cinematograph film or a sound recording, each with its own sub-definition in which the operative words are inclusive for literary works, require fixation for dramatic works, exclude lyrics from musical works, disregard artistic quality for paintings and photographs, disregard the medium for films and sound recordings. Copyright subsists in such a work only if it is original in the sense of Eastern Book Company, only if the connecting factors in section 13(2) are met, and not at all if it is itself an infringement. "Publication" under section 3 means making the work available to the public by issuing copies or communicating it to the public, and section 4 excludes publication without the owner's licence. A work is deemed first published in India under section 5 even if published simultaneously abroad, unless the other country grants a shorter term, and simultaneity means within THIRTY DAYS. The three definitions together decide what is protected, for how long, and where.
The rest of the answers
You have read the paper as it was set and the first model answer in full. The remaining answers come with the bundle, along with every other solved paper for this semester.
See the semester for ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or just the solved papers: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, as does the syllabus and module one of every subject.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.