munotes®

LLB 3 years Sem 2 Constitutional Law Nov 2011 Question Paper with Solutions

Mumbai University Solved Question Papers

Constitutional Law

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

LLB 3 years · Sem 2

Nov 2011 Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 17 October 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the Nov 2011 examination.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii
munotes.in iv
munotes.in v

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the Nov 2011 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 100  ·  25 questions answered

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in vi

SECTION I

Answer in short.

Not more than two sentences · , all 10 20 Marks

munotes.in 1

1.State any two shortcomings of the Government of India Act, 1919.[2]

Answer

The Government of India Act, 1919 introduced dyarchy in the Provinces, but it failed in practice. Any two of these shortcomings answer the question.

  1. Dyarchy was unworkable. Provincial subjects were split into reserved subjects, with the Governor, and transferred subjects, with Indian ministers. But land revenue and finance were reserved. So the ministers in charge of education and health had to ask an official, answerable to nobody, for the money they needed.
  2. The division of subjects was artificial. Agriculture was transferred but irrigation was reserved. A minister could not run one without the other.
  3. The Governor could override the ministers even in transferred subjects. So the ministers had responsibility without power.
  4. No collective responsibility. The ministers were chosen individually and did not act as a team answerable to the legislature.
munotes.in 2
  1. No responsible government at the Centre. The Governor-General's executive council answered to neither House. He could certify a Bill the legislature had refused and restore a grant it had rejected.
  2. Communal electorates were extended to Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians and Europeans. This deepened communal divisions.
  3. A narrow franchise. Only about ten per cent of adult men could vote.

Result. These defects led to the Simon Commission of 1927 and later to the Government of India Act, 1935.

munotes.in 3

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest come with the LL.B. 3 Years Semester 2 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in

Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499

The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!