From Report to Statute
Chapter Seventy-Six
Syllabus topic 4, "Clinical Legal Education - Legal aid, Legal Literacy, Legal survey and Law reform"
Pages 284 to 287 of 543
In one line
A recommendation has to survive seven stages before it becomes law, any one of which can stop it, and most recommendations stop at the first.
In the wording a student can write in an exam: a law reform proposal travels from the report to the administrative ministry, which must accept it; to the Ministry of Law and Justice for drafting; to the Cabinet for approval; to Parliament for introduction, where it may be referred to a committee, and must pass both Houses; to the President for assent; and finally to commencement by notification and to the making of the rules without which it cannot operate; a recommendation may be lost at any of these stages, and the commonest place for it to be lost is the first, since a report which no ministry adopts goes no further.
The seven stages
One: the report is submitted. It goes to the Ministry of Law and Justice with the Chairman's covering letter.
Two: the administrative ministry considers it. Every subject belongs to a department, and the report goes to whichever administers the Act. If that department does not want the reform, the proposal stops here, and nothing compels it to explain why. This is where most recommendations die.
Three: drafting. If the reform is accepted, the Legislative Department prepares a Bill, often from the Commission's own draft.
Four: the Cabinet. Approval to introduce.
Five: Parliament. Introduction in either House, sometimes reference to a departmentally related standing committee or a select or joint committee, consideration, amendment and passing by both Houses. Legislative time is the constraint, and a Bill with no political constituency waits.
Six: assent. The President assents and it becomes an Act.
Seven: commencement and rules. Many Acts provide that they come into force on a date the Government appoints, and many need rules and regulations before they can operate at all. A commenced Act without rules is not working law.
The seventh stage is the one students forget, and this book has already met it twice: the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 received assent on 11 October 1987 and commenced on 9 November 1995, chapter 550; and almost everything about how a person obtains legal aid is in the regulations made under section 29, not in the Act, chapter 590.
Why stage two is where most proposals stop
The department is being asked to change its own law. A reform commonly reduces discretion, adds an obligation or transfers a power, and the body asked to agree is the body that would lose.
Nothing compels a decision. A report can be received and simply not acted on, and no time limit runs.
And a report has no constituency. A Bill that nobody outside the ministry is pressing for is easy to leave in a file.
From Report to Statute
What overcomes it. Public attention, a court's observation, a strong professional body, or a crisis. In practice most implemented reports had one of those behind them.
The worked example: the 184th Report
What it proposed, chapter 80. A statutory definition of standards of legal education, and coordinating amendments to the Advocates Act 1961 and the University Grants Commission Act 1956 so that the roles of the Bar Council of India and the University Grants Commission are stated rather than left to overlap.
How far it travelled. Not into an amending Act. The Advocates Act was not amended in the respects the report proposed, and the divided jurisdiction of chapter 110 remains.
And what happened instead, which is the interesting half. The reform arrived by another route entirely: the Bar Council of India made the Rules of Legal Education 2008 under section 7(1)(h) and section 49(1)(af), and those rules supply, in subordinate legislation, a great deal of the content the report wanted put in the statute.
Two lessons a candidate should draw. First, a recommendation that fails at stage two may still change the law if a regulator can act within its existing powers. Second, that route has a limit: a regulator cannot cure the absence of a definition in the parent Act, and cannot decide a conflict with another regulator, so the parts of the 184th Report that needed a statute are still unimplemented twenty-four years later.
The other routes a reform can take
Subordinate legislation, as above, and it is the route that actually reformed Indian legal education and legal aid delivery, chapters 130 and 590.
A judicial decision. Free legal services became a right through Hoskot, Hussainara Khatoon, Khatri and Suk Das, chapter 630, before any statute delivered it.
Administrative direction. A practice direction, a circular or a form can change what happens in a court without any change in the law, which is the reform chapter 710's worked example recommends.
And a scheme. Legal aid ran on executive schemes for fifteen years before the Act commenced, chapter 550.
The general point for an answer. Legislation is one route among several, and often the slowest. A student asked how a reform should be brought about earns marks for identifying the fastest route that is legally available, not for assuming an amendment.
What makes a report likely to be implemented
A draft Bill annexed. A ministry that must draft from scratch has a reason to postpone.
A narrow, technical proposal. Repeal of obsolete Acts and consolidation pass more easily than proposals that redistribute power.
Evidence. A recommendation resting on findings is harder to refuse than one resting on reasoning alone, which is chapter 740's whole subject.
From Report to Statute
An ally who can press. A professional body, a court's observation, or a public campaign.
And no loser inside government. A reform that costs a department nothing is much more likely to survive stage two.
A worked example
Take the reform chapter 710 identified: a printed form in the remand file recording whether the accused was informed of the right to free legal services.
By statute. Seven stages, years, and no political constituency. It would probably die at stage two.
By judicial decision. A further judgment restating a duty already declared in Khatri adds nothing, since the failure is in practice.
By administrative direction. The High Court on its administrative side prescribes the form. One decision, immediate effect, no Bill.
By regulation. NALSA makes it a monitored item under regulations 10 to 12 of the 2010 Regulations, which already require the quality of services to be looked at.
The correct answer is the third or the fourth, and identifying that is the difference between a candidate who knows how law changes and one who has only learned that Parliament legislates.
Quick revision
Seven stages: report submitted; administrative ministry accepts; drafting by the Legislative Department; Cabinet approval; Parliament, with possible committee reference and passage by both Houses; assent; and commencement plus the rules without which the Act cannot operate.
Most proposals die at stage two, because the department asked to agree is the one that would lose a power, nothing compels a decision, and a report has no constituency.
The 184th Report did not produce an amending Act; the reform arrived instead through the Rules of Legal Education 2008, made under the Bar Council's existing powers. But subordinate legislation cannot supply a definition missing from the parent Act or resolve a conflict between two regulators.
Other routes: subordinate legislation, judicial decision, administrative direction, and executive scheme. Legislation is one route among several and often the slowest.
What makes implementation likely: a draft Bill annexed, a narrow technical proposal, evidence, an ally who can press, and no loser inside government.
Test yourself
1. Set out the seven stages between a report and working law. Submission of the report; consideration and acceptance by the administrative ministry; drafting of a Bill by the Legislative Department; Cabinet approval; introduction and passage in Parliament, possibly after committee reference; assent; and commencement by notification together with the making of the rules without which the Act cannot operate.
2. Where do most recommendations stop, and why? At the administrative ministry. The department asked to agree is usually the one whose discretion would be reduced or whose power transferred, nothing compels it to decide or to explain a refusal, and a report with no outside constituency is easy to leave in a file.
From Report to Statute
3. What happened to the 184th Report's proposals, and what does that show about routes to reform? They did not produce an amending Act, but much of the substance arrived through the Rules of Legal Education 2008, made by the Bar Council of India under its existing powers. It shows that a recommendation failing at the ministry may still change the law through subordinate legislation, but also that this route has a limit: a regulator cannot supply a definition missing from the parent Act or resolve a conflict with another regulator.
4. Name four routes by which a reform can take effect, and say which is usually slowest. Legislation; subordinate legislation by a regulator; judicial decision; and administrative direction or executive scheme. Legislation is usually the slowest, since it must survive all seven stages and compete for legislative time.
The rest of this subject
These notes are cut from the University's printed syllabus. Open the syllabus itself, or the past papers, for the same subject.