KSLU Solved Question Papers
Labour Law II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 6
2024 Aug Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Labour Law II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 6
2024 Aug Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2024 Aug examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2024 Aug examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2024 Aug examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 80 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning of labour welfare (facilities and services, inside and outside the workplace, statutory and voluntary, for the worker's health, safety, comfort and family) and of labour welfare legislation; the constitutional provisions: the Preamble's social and economic justice; the Fundamental Rights (Articles 14, 16, 19(1)(c), 21, 23, 24); the Directive Principles (Articles 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 43A, 47); the legislative power in List III (entries 22 to 24); the decided cases: Randhir Singh, Olga Tellis, PUDR, Bandhua Mukti Morcha, M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Corporation of Delhi; a table; a conclusion.
Labour welfare means the facilities, services and amenities provided for workers. They let workers work in healthy, safe and decent conditions and live with dignity. It goes beyond wages. It covers the worker's health, safety, comfort and the well-being of his family.
Welfare may be grouped in two ways.
Labour welfare legislation means the laws that make such welfare compulsory. Examples are the Factories Act, the Maternity Benefit Act, the Employees' State Insurance Act and the Employees' Provident Funds Act. These are now consolidated in the Labour Codes.
The Preamble promises justice, "social, economic and political", and dignity of the individual. Labour welfare is one of the chief means of social and economic justice.
Labour is in the Concurrent List. Entry 22 covers trade unions and industrial and labour disputes. Entry 23 covers social security and employment. Entry 24 covers welfare of labour, including conditions of work, provident funds, employers' liability, workmen's compensation, pensions and maternity benefits. Both Parliament and the States may legislate.
Randhir Singh v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 879. A Delhi Police driver-constable was paid less than other Government drivers doing identical work. The Supreme Court held that equal pay for equal work, a Directive Principle under Article 39(d), is enforceable through Articles 14 and 16. His pay was raised accordingly.
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, AIR 1986 SC 180. Pavement dwellers in Bombay faced eviction. The Supreme Court held that the right to life in Article 21 includes the right to livelihood. No one can live without the means of living.
People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 1473. Workers on the Asian Games sites were paid below the minimum wage, and children worked there. The Supreme Court held that work for less than the minimum wage is forced labour under Article 23. Employing children in construction violates Article 24.
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 802. Workers in the stone quarries of Faridabad were held in bondage. The Supreme Court held that the right to live with human dignity under Article 21 draws its life from the Directive Principles. It directed the release and rehabilitation of bonded labourers.
M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1996) 6 SCC 756. Children worked in the hazardous match and fireworks factories of Sivakasi. The Supreme Court gave effect to Articles 24 and 39 by ordering compensation into a rehabilitation fund.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Female Workers (Muster Roll), AIR 2000 SC 1274. Casual women workers were denied maternity benefit. The Supreme Court used Article 42 to hold them entitled.
| Provision | Labour welfare value | Case |
|---|---|---|
| Articles 14, 16, 39(d) | Equal pay | Randhir Singh |
| Article 21 | Livelihood and dignity | Olga Tellis; Bandhua Mukti Morcha |
| Article 23 | No forced labour | PUDR |
| Article 24 | No child labour | M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu |
| Article 42 | Humane conditions, maternity relief | Municipal Corporation of Delhi |
| Article 43 | Living wage |
Conclusion. Labour welfare means the facilities and services that let workers work and live in health, safety and dignity, and labour welfare legislation makes them compulsory. The Constitution supports it through the Preamble and the Fundamental Rights in Articles 14, 16, 19, 21, 23 and 24. The Directive Principles in Articles 38 to 43A and 47 add to them. The courts have read the Directive Principles into the Fundamental Rights, as Randhir Singh, PUDR and Bandhua Mukti Morcha show. So labour welfare is today a constitutional command, not a matter of charity.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.