KSLU Solved Question Papers
Family Law II (Mohammedan Law and Indian Succession Act)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 6
2013 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Family Law II (Mohammedan Law and Indian Succession Act)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 6
2013 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2013 Jun examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2013 Jun examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2013 Jun examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: part A, the definition: the definition adopted in Abdul Kadir v. Salima, taken word by word (what, by whom, to whom, "in consideration of the marriage", "by operation of law"); the three purposes dower serves; Shah Bano on why dower is not a payment "on divorce"; part B, the kinds on three bases: (1) how the amount is fixed (specified dower, with the minimums of the schools and the Oudh rule, and proper dower with its measure); (2) when it is payable (prompt, deferred, partly each, and the presumption); (3) how much of it is confirmed (full dower on consummation, valid retirement or death; half on divorce before consummation; a present of clothes where none was fixed); T.K. Moidu Haji on valid retirement; how each kind is enforced, with Maina Bibi on the widow's retention; a table and a worked example; a conclusion.
Dower is called mahr (or mehr) in Arabic. The leading Indian definition comes from Mahmood J. in the Allahabad Full Bench.
Abdul Kadir v. Salima (1886) ILR 8 All 149. A husband sued for restitution of conjugal rights, and his wife refused to return until her prompt dower was paid. The Court defined dower as a sum of money or other property promised by the husband to the wife in consideration of the marriage. It added a second limb. Even where no dower is fixed, the law gives the wife the right of dower as a necessary effect of the marriage. The Court upheld a decree for restitution on the condition that the husband first paid the prompt dower.
Dower serves three purposes.
Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum AIR 1985 SC 945. A wife of 62, divorced after 43 years of marriage, claimed maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The husband said he had paid her dower, so the order should go. Section 127(3)(b) let a court cancel an order where a sum payable "on divorce" had been paid. The Supreme Court held that mahr is not an amount payable on divorce. It is a mark of respect to the wife and arises from the marriage itself. Paying it did not end the husband's duty to maintain a destitute divorced wife. The provision is now section 146(3)(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.
The case confirms the definition. Dower is owed because of the marriage, not because of the divorce.
The two words look alike but mean opposite things. Dower is paid by the husband to the wife. Dowry is property demanded from the bride's family for the husband's side, and the Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 forbids it.
Dower is classified on three different bases. Each answers a different question.
(a) Specified dower (mahr-i-musamma). This is the amount fixed by agreement. It may be fixed before the marriage, at the marriage, or after it. A guardian may fix it for a minor son, and the son is then bound by it.
(b) Proper or customary dower (mahr-i-misl). This is the amount the law supplies where none was fixed. It is also due where the marriage was made on the void condition that there be no dower.
The court measures it by comparison. It looks at the dower received by women of her father's family of similar standing, such as her sisters and paternal aunts. It also weighs her age, beauty, understanding and character, and the husband's means. Shia law caps proper dower at 500 dirhams, the dower of the Prophet's daughter Fatima.
(a) Prompt dower (muajjal). This is payable at once, on demand, after the marriage. The wife may demand it at any time during the marriage. No cause of action arises until she demands it and the husband refuses. Until it is paid she may refuse to live with him.
(b) Deferred dower (muwajjal). This is payable on the dissolution of the marriage, by death or divorce, or on a date or event fixed in the contract. The wife cannot demand it while the marriage lasts. The husband may pay it early if he wishes.
(c) Partly prompt and partly deferred. This is common in practice. A marriage deed often makes one portion prompt and the rest deferred.
The presumption. Where the amount is fixed but the deed is silent on timing, Indian courts following Abdul Kadir presume the whole to be prompt. Some courts first look for a custom in the wife's family that splits it. Shia law treats the whole as prompt.
This basis asks how much of the dower the wife has actually earned when the marriage ends.
Valid retirement (khilwat-us-sahiha) means the spouses being alone together where nothing prevents marital intercourse. Under Sunni law it has the same effect as consummation for dower.
T.K. Moidu Haji v. Konnapalarkandy Mariyam (Kerala High Court, 2 June 2006). A husband of 73 divorced his wife after about three years together. When she claimed her dues under section 3 of the 1986 Act, he said the marriage was never consummated. The High Court adopted Mulla's definition of valid retirement. It held that in Sunni law valid retirement has the same effect as consummation for dower, paternity and iddat. Consummation is presumed from cohabitation unless the contrary is proved. It also held that a divorced woman is entitled to her mahr whether or not the marriage was consummated.
Maina Bibi v. Chaudhri Vakil Ahmed (1925) 27 Bom LR 796 (Privy Council). A widow held her late husband's lands, claiming to keep them until her unpaid dower was satisfied. The other heirs sued for possession. The Privy Council held that a widow who has lawfully and peaceably obtained possession may retain it until her dower debt is paid. The right comes from Muslim law, not from any pledge by the husband, so it is not a mortgage. She must account for the profits she receives.
| Basis | Kind | When due | Key rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | specified | as agreed | no maximum; Hanafi minimum ten dirhams |
| Amount | proper | as the law supplies | measured by her father's family |
| Time | prompt | on demand | she may refuse cohabitation |
| Time | deferred | on death or divorce | cannot be demanded earlier |
| Confirmation | full | consummation, valid retirement, death | whole amount |
| Confirmation | half | divorce before consummation | half the specified sum |
| Confirmation | muta | divorce before consummation, none fixed | three articles of dress |
Salma's marriage deed fixes dower of three lakh rupees: one lakh prompt and two lakh deferred.
Conclusion. Dower is money or property that the husband owes the wife because of the marriage. The law imposes it even where nothing is agreed, as Abdul Kadir v. Salima holds. Shah Bano confirms that it flows from the marriage and is not a payment for divorce. Its kinds answer three questions: how much (specified or proper), when (prompt or deferred), and how much is earned (full, half or a present). Valid retirement counts as consummation under Sunni law, as T.K. Moidu Haji shows. Every kind is a debt the wife can enforce, and Maina Bibi lets a widow in possession hold the estate until it is paid.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.