munotes®

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) Sem 5 Labour Law I 2016 Dec Question Paper with Solutions

KSLU Solved Question Papers

Labour Law I

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 5

2016 Dec Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2016 Dec examination.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii
munotes.in iv

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2016 Dec examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 100  ·  13 questions answered

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in v

Q1Explain the term "Industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.[16]

Answer

For full marks, cover: why the meaning of "industry" decides the reach of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947; the words of section 2(j) and its employer limb and workmen limb; the meaning traced through four phases of decided cases: the wide working principle (Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, 1960); the narrowing (University of Delhi v. Ram Nath, 1963; Safdarjung Hospital, 1970); the settlement (Bangalore Water Supply, 1978: triple test, dominant nature test, the narrow exceptions, cases overruled); the doubt and its answer (the 1982 amendment never brought into force; Jai Bir Singh, 2005 reference and 2026 decision); sovereign functions (Tamil Nad Non-Gazetted Officers' Union); a table of activities; the Industrial Relations Code 2020; a conclusion.

Why the meaning matters

Every right under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 depends on an "industry". An "industrial dispute" must arise in one, a "workman" must be employed in one, and lay-off, retrenchment and closure compensation are paid only there. So if an employer's activity is not an industry, its employees are outside the whole Act. That is why the definition has been argued over for seventy years.

munotes.in 1

The words: section 2(j)

"Industry" means "any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers and includes any calling, service, employment, handicraft, or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen".

  1. The employer limb. "Business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers" looks at the activity from the employer's side.
  2. The workmen limb. The words after "includes" look at it from the workmen's side, and widen it.

The words are among the widest in the statute book. The courts' task has been to find their limits.

munotes.in 2

Phase 1: a wide working principle

State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, AIR 1960 SC 610. Ward servants of the J.J. Group of Hospitals, run by the State of Bombay, were retrenched without compensation. The State argued that a Government hospital could not be an industry. The Supreme Court disagreed. "Industry" is of wide import, and the rule of reading words by their neighbours (noscitur a sociis) does not narrow it. A profit motive and invested capital are not essential. Regal or sovereign functions are outside, but welfare activities are not. The working principle is an activity "systematically and habitually undertaken" to produce or distribute goods or render material services, with employees organised as in a trade or business. On that test the hospitals were an industry.

Phase 2: the narrowing

The Court then drew the line much tighter.

munotes.in 3

University of Delhi v. Ram Nath, AIR 1963 SC 1873. Two drivers of buses run by Miranda House, a college of the University, were discharged when the loss-making service stopped. They claimed retrenchment compensation. The Supreme Court held that the University's educational work was not an industry. Teachers, who do the real work, are not workmen, and the drivers' role was "minor, subsidiary and insignificant". "Education in its true aspect is more a mission and a vocation rather than a profession or trade or business".

Management of Safdarjung Hospital v. Kuldip Singh Sethi, AIR 1970 SC 1407. A clerk of the Government's Safdarjung Hospital in New Delhi claimed arrears on a revised pay scale. A Bench of six Judges held that neither this hospital nor two others heard with it were industries. An industry must be an economic activity analogous to trade or business. A hospital could be an industry only if run "as a business in a commercial way". Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, it said, "took an extreme view".

munotes.in 4

Phase 3: the settlement in Bangalore Water Supply

Bangalore Water-Supply and Sewerage Board v. R. Rajappa, AIR 1978 SC 548. The Board, a statutory body supplying water and sewerage services in Bangalore, punished some employees. It argued that it was not an industry. Because the Court's earlier decisions could not be reconciled, a Bench of seven Judges heard the case. It held the Board an industry and laid down these propositions.

  1. The triple test. Three features together mark an industry prima facie. There is (i) a systematic activity, (ii) carried on through co-operation between employer and employees. Its aim is (iii) to produce or distribute goods or services that meet human wants, other than merely spiritual or religious ones.
  2. No profit needed. Whether the sector is public or private, it does not matter that no capital is invested or no profit sought.
  3. Function, not form. The court asks what the activity is and how employer and employees relate, not who the employer is. An activity driven by charity is still an industry if it meets the test.
munotes.in 5
  1. Dominant nature. Where an institution carries on several activities, the predominant nature of its services decides. If that is an industry, the whole undertaking is one.
  2. Wide reach. Professions, clubs, educational and research institutions, co-operatives and charitable projects are industries if they meet the test.
  3. Narrow exceptions. Only sovereign functions, strictly understood, are outside. A small charity run by volunteers, without employees in the industrial sense, may also be outside. Even within a sovereign department, severable units of an industrial kind are industries.

The Court overruled Safdarjung Hospital, University of Delhi and several cases on clubs and professions, and approved Hospital Mazdoor Sabha.

munotes.in 6

Sovereign functions

Tamil Nad Non-Gazetted Government Officers' Union v. Registrar of Trade Unions, AIR 1962 Mad 234. An association open to the State's non-gazetted officers sought registration as a trade union, and was refused. A Division Bench of the Madras High Court upheld the refusal. The core civil service performs the inalienable and regal functions of government, which are not an industry. Government corporations and undertakings of an industrial kind stand on a different footing. Bangalore Water Supply kept this exception, but read it strictly.

Phase 4: the doubt and its answer

Parliament tried to narrow the definition by the Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act 1982. Its new section 2(j) adopted the triple test with express exclusions. Among them were hospitals, educational and research institutions, charities, sovereign functions, domestic service, and small professions and clubs. It was never brought into force.

munotes.in 7

State of U.P. v. Jai Bir Singh, (2005) 5 SCC 1. The question was whether a State's social forestry department was an industry. A five-Judge Bench noted that Bangalore Water Supply had made almost every organised activity an industry, and that the 1982 amendment lay dormant. It referred Bangalore Water Supply to a larger Bench for reconsideration. A nine-Judge Bench answered on 20 August 2026 (2026 SCC OnLine SC 1684). The Judges wrote several opinions. The Chief Justice's lead opinion refined the test, requiring goods or services of "a discernible commercial character", but only for the future. The Court was clear that disputes still pending under the 1947 Act are decided by the Bangalore Water Supply test.

An assessment

The wide reading protects workers wherever they are organised to produce goods or services, whoever employs them. That was its purpose, and Hospital Mazdoor Sabha and Bangalore Water Supply both rest on it. Its cost is that charities, research bodies and Government welfare schemes carry the full weight of the Act, including retrenchment rules and adjudication. Parliament twice tried to answer that. In 1982 it passed an amendment it never brought into force, and in 2020 it wrote express exclusions into the Code. The Supreme Court's 2026 refinement points the same way, but only for the future.

munotes.in 8

Activities at a glance

ActivityIndustry?Authority
Government hospitalyesHospital Mazdoor Sabha, approved in Bangalore Water Supply
University or collegeyes for the Act; teachers are not workmenBangalore Water Supply, overruling University of Delhi
Water and sewerage boardyesBangalore Water Supply
Club, profession or research body with employeesyes, if the triple test is metBangalore Water Supply
Core civil service, sovereign functionsnoTamil Nad Non-Gazetted Officers' Union
Small charity run by volunteersnoBangalore Water Supply
munotes.in 9

Where the law stands now

The 1947 Act was repealed on 21 November 2025 by section 104 of the Industrial Relations Code 2020. Section 2(p) of the Code writes the triple test into the statute. Capital and profit are irrelevant, and workers engaged through contractors are covered. It expressly excludes four things. The first is an institution owned or managed by an organisation wholly or substantially engaged in charitable, social or philanthropic service. The others are sovereign functions of Government, including defence research, atomic energy and space; domestic service; and any activity the Central Government notifies. The 2026 ruling says it is not an aid to reading the Code.

Conclusion. "Industry" under section 2(j) began with a wide working principle in Hospital Mazdoor Sabha. It was narrowed in University of Delhi and Safdarjung Hospital, and settled in Bangalore Water Supply. That case's triple test brings in almost every organised activity producing goods or services, except sovereign functions and small voluntary charities. Jai Bir Singh questioned it, but the 2026 decision left it to govern every pending dispute. The Code now writes the triple test into law with express exclusions.

munotes.in 10

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest come with the KSLU B.A. LL.B. Semester 5 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in

The question paper itself stays free.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!