KSLU Solved Question Papers
White Collar Crimes
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 10
2025 Jan Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
White Collar Crimes
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 10
2025 Jan Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2025 Jan examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2025 Jan examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2025 Jan examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 80 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: the concept: Sutherland's purpose (1939, 1949), his definition and each element, how it differs from traditional crime, and the criticism (Tappan; status; two kinds mixed); the kinds: by who benefits (occupational and corporate crime) and by field (trade and business, corporate and financial, tax, professional, official, political, cyber), with the law for each; Standard Chartered Bank, Swami Achyutanand Tirth and Sita Soren; a conclusion on why the kinds matter.
Before 1939, criminology explained crime by poverty, slums, broken homes and low intelligence. Its data came from prisons, which held mostly the poor. Edwin H. Sutherland challenged this in his presidential address to the American Sociological Society in 1939. He expanded it in his book White Collar Crime in 1949.
He studied the records of the seventy largest American corporations. Courts and commissions had decided against every one of them, for false advertising, restraint of trade, patent infringement and fraud. Rich and respected men were breaking the law at their work. So poverty could not be the general cause of crime.
He defined white collar crime as "a crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation".
| Point | Traditional crime | White collar crime |
|---|---|---|
| Offender | Often poor, marginal | Respectable, powerful |
| Method | Force or stealth | Deception, abuse of position |
| Victim | A known individual | Diffuse: public, revenue, consumers |
| Public attitude | Strong condemnation | Mild, often admiration |
| Usual outcome | Prosecution | Penalty, settlement or nothing |
These criticisms led later writers to divide the subject into kinds.
Indian law now reaches the second kind directly. In Standard Chartered Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2005) 4 SCC 530, the bank was prosecuted under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973. It argued that a company cannot be jailed, so it cannot be tried for an offence carrying compulsory imprisonment. The Constitution Bench held that a company can be prosecuted, and the court imposes the fine. Section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act now fines a company whose associate pays a bribe.
Trade crime in practice. In Swami Achyutanand Tirth v. Union of India, (2016) 9 SCC 699, a petition showed milk being adulterated with urea, detergent and caustic soda. A national survey had found 68.4 per cent of samples non-conforming. The Supreme Court directed laboratories, sampling drives and State committees, and noted the higher penalties some States had adopted.
Political crime in practice. In Sita Soren v. Union of India, 2024 INSC 161, a legislator was charged with taking a bribe to vote in a Rajya Sabha election. A seven-judge Bench held that legislators have no immunity from prosecution for bribery. The offence is complete when the bribe is accepted.
Each kind needs its own tools. Corporate crime needs liability for companies and their officers. Professional crime needs strong regulators such as the Bar Council and the National Medical Commission. Official and political crime needs independent investigators and the removal of immunities.
Conclusion. White collar crime is Sutherland's crime of the respectable, committed through their occupation by abuse of trust. Its kinds are occupational and corporate by beneficiary, and trade, financial, tax, professional, official, political and cyber by field. Standard Chartered Bank, Swami Achyutanand Tirth and Sita Soren show the law reaching each. Classifying it shows which law and which agency must respond.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.