KSLU Solved Question Papers
White Collar Crimes
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 10
2014 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
White Collar Crimes
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 10
2014 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2014 Dec examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2014 Dec examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2014 Dec examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: what white collar crime is (Sutherland's definition of 1939 and 1949 and its four elements; the Indian idea of privileged class deviance); why the professions breed it (expert knowledge the client cannot judge, trust, monopoly, self-regulation, payment by the person served); the professions one by one, each with its forms, law, regulator and a case: doctors (BNS section 106(1), PCPNDT and MTP Acts, the National Medical Commission; Jacob Mathew, Poonam Verma, V. Kishan Rao), lawyers (Advocates Act section 35, Bar Council of India Rules; V.C. Rangadurai, Harish Chandra Tiwari, R.K. Anand), judges (K. Veeraswami), auditors, valuers and engineers (Companies Act sections 143(12) and 447, the National Financial Reporting Authority), teachers (BNS section 112), journalists (Press Council Act section 14); a summary table; why control is weak; reforms.
Edwin H. Sutherland introduced the term in 1939 and developed it in White Collar Crime (1949). He defined it as "a crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation". Four elements follow.
Indian writing calls the wider field privileged class deviance: wrongs by those whose power or position protects them. The professions are a central part of it.
Forms. Unnecessary surgery and tests; commissions from laboratories and drug companies; false medical certificates. Others are sex determination of foetuses, illegal abortion, organ trade and treatment by the unqualified.
Law and regulator. Death by a rash or negligent act is punishable under BNS section 106(1) (formerly IPC section 304A). Where a registered medical practitioner causes it during a medical procedure, the maximum is two years. The PCPNDT Act 1994 bans sex selection, and the MTP Act 1971 limits abortion. The National Medical Commission and the State Medical Councils discipline doctors.
Cases. In Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab, AIR 2005 SC 3180, a patient died at a Ludhiana hospital when the oxygen cylinder brought to him was empty. The Supreme Court held that a doctor is criminally liable only for gross negligence, not for an error of judgment. In Poonam Verma v. Ashwin Patel, AIR 1996 SC 2111, a homeopath treated a patient with allopathic drugs and the patient died. The Court held that practising a system one is not qualified in is negligence per se. In V. Kishan Rao v. Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital, (2010) 5 SCC 513, a woman with malaria was treated for typhoid and died. The Court held that expert evidence is not needed in every simple case of medical negligence.
Forms. Misappropriating clients' money; deceiving clients about their cases; touting for briefs; tampering with witnesses; colluding with the other side; and strikes that abandon clients.
Law and regulator. The State Bar Councils punish professional or other misconduct under section 35 of the Advocates Act 1961. The standards are in the Bar Council of India Rules, Part VI, Chapter II.
Cases. In V.C. Rangadurai v. D. Gopalan, AIR 1979 SC 281, an advocate never filed his elderly clients' suits but told them they were pending and decreed. The Supreme Court upheld his suspension and ordered him to pay Rs 2,500 to the victim. In Harish Chandra Tiwari v. Baiju, (2002) 2 SCC 67, an advocate withdrew his poor client's compensation of Rs 8,118 and kept it. The Court removed him from the roll. It said money of the client in an advocate's hands "is a trust". In R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court, decided on 29 July 2009, a sting operation showed a senior defence advocate dealing with a key witness. The Court upheld his conviction for contempt.
Forms. Bribery for judgments, disproportionate assets and favouritism.
Case. In K. Veeraswami v. Union of India, (1991) 3 SCR 189, a former Chief Justice of the Madras High Court was prosecuted for disproportionate assets. The Supreme Court held that a superior court judge is a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act. No case may be registered without first consulting the Chief Justice of India.
Forms. Certifying false accounts; valuing property to the figure a borrower wants; certifying building work never done or materials never used. Their certificate is what banks, investors and buyers rely on, so a false one lets other frauds through.
Law and regulator. An auditor may have reason to believe that a fraud is being committed in the company. Section 143(12) of the Companies Act 2013 then requires him to report it. Large frauds go to the Central Government. Section 447 covers fraud of ten lakh rupees or more, or one per cent of turnover if lower. It punishes it with six months to ten years and a fine up to three times the amount. The minimum is three years where public interest is involved. The National Financial Reporting Authority oversees the auditors of specified classes of companies. The professional institutes discipline their members.
Forms. Leaking and selling question papers; selling marks; forcing students into private tuition; plagiarism and research fraud; and abuse of power over students.
Law. A member of a group or gang who sells public examination question papers commits petty organised crime under BNS section 112. It is punishable with one to seven years. There is no single disciplinary council for teachers. They are disciplined by their employers.
Forms. "Paid news" presented as reporting; blackmail; and false or defamatory stories.
Law and regulator. The Press Council of India acts under section 14 of the Press Council Act 1978. It may inquire into a newspaper that breaks journalistic ethics, or a journalist guilty of professional misconduct. It may then warn, admonish or censure them.
| Profession | Typical crime | Main control |
|---|---|---|
| Doctors | Unnecessary treatment, sex selection, false certificates | BNS s.106(1); PCPNDT; NMC |
| Lawyers | Misappropriation, deceit, touting | Advocates Act s.35; BCI Rules |
| Judges | Bribery, disproportionate assets | PCA; Veeraswami safeguard |
| Profession | Typical crime | Main control |
|---|---|---|
| Auditors and valuers | False certificates | Companies Act ss.143(12), 447; NFRA |
| Teachers | Paper leaks, sale of marks | BNS s.112; service rules |
| Journalists | Paid news | Press Council Act s.14 |
The answer is outside oversight of self-regulators, as the NFRA does for auditors. Duties to report should be backed by penalties, as section 143(12) does. Disciplinary records should be public, and victims should get compensation.
Conclusion. White collar crime, in Sutherland's words, is crime by "a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation". The professions breed it because clients rely on expert knowledge they cannot check. Doctors face BNS section 106(1), the PCPNDT and MTP Acts and the Medical Commission (Jacob Mathew, Poonam Verma). Lawyers face section 35 of the Advocates Act (V.C. Rangadurai, Harish Chandra Tiwari), and judges are public servants (Veeraswami). Auditors face sections 143(12) and 447 of the Companies Act, teachers BNS section 112, and journalists the Press Council. Control remains weak because peers judge peers and victims rarely know they were wronged.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.