KSLU Solved Question Papers
Offences against Child and Juvenile Offences (Hons)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 10
2022 Oct Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Offences against Child and Juvenile Offences (Hons)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 10
2022 Oct Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 2 November 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2022 Oct examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2022 Oct examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2022 Oct examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 2½ hours · Total marks 70 · 12 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: why children need special international protection; the early declarations (Geneva 1924, United Nations 1959); the general human rights treaties (Universal Declaration, ICCPR); the Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989, its four general principles and its Committee; the two Optional Protocols of 2000; the ILO Conventions on child labour; India's acceptance; Indian cases that use these instruments (Lakshmi Kant Pandey v. Union of India, Gaurav Jain v. Union of India); an assessment; and a conclusion.
Children are dependent on adults and cannot protect their own rights. They are open to neglect, abuse, labour, trafficking and sexual exploitation. So international law gives them rights of their own, beyond the general rights of every person.
Geneva Declaration, 1924. The League of Nations adopted it on 26 September 1924. It records that "mankind owes to the Child the best that it has to give". It lists five duties. The child must have the means for normal development, and food, nursing and shelter. The child must be first to get relief, be protected against exploitation, and be raised to serve others.
United Nations Declaration of the Rights of the Child, 1959. The General Assembly adopted it on 20 November 1959. It has ten principles. Principle 2 makes the child's best interests "the paramount consideration" in making laws. Principle 9 protects the child from neglect, cruelty, exploitation and traffic, and from employment before a minimum age.
Both were declarations, not treaties. They bound no State but shaped the later Convention.
Adoption and force. The Convention was adopted on 20 November 1989 and entered into force on 2 September 1990. It turned the Declarations into binding obligations.
Who is a child. Article 1: every human being below eighteen, unless majority comes earlier under the applicable law.
The four general principles. The Committee on the Rights of the Child treats four Articles as running through the whole Convention:
The rights in clusters. The Convention protects civil rights such as a name and nationality (Article 7) and family life. It covers health (Article 24), education (Article 28) and play (Article 31). Its special protection Articles cover child labour (Article 32), sexual exploitation (Article 34), sale and trafficking (Article 35) and juvenile justice (Article 40). Article 37(a) forbids death or life imprisonment without release for offences by persons below eighteen.
Supervision. Article 43 creates the Committee on the Rights of the Child, now of eighteen experts. Under Article 44 each State reports within two years of joining and then every five years.
| Protocol | Adopted; in force | Core duty | India |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children in armed conflict | 25 May 2000; 12 February 2002 | no direct part in hostilities and no compulsory recruitment below eighteen | ratified 30 November 2005 |
| Protocol | Adopted; in force | Core duty | India |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography | 25 May 2000; 18 January 2002 | define and criminalise these acts | ratified 16 August 2005 |
| Communications procedure | 19 December 2011; 14 April 2014 | complaints to the Committee | not a party |
India ratified both on 13 June 2017, specifying fourteen as its minimum age.
India acceded to the Convention on 11 December 1992. It declared that it would "progressively implement" Article 32 on minimum ages for employment. The preamble of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 records that accession. The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 also relies on the Convention.
Indian courts use these instruments to give content to the Constitution.
Lakshmi Kant Pandey v. Union of India, (1984) 2 SCC 244. Facts. A letter alleged malpractice by agencies sending Indian children abroad for adoption. Held: the Court laid down safeguards for inter-country adoption, with the child's welfare as the paramount consideration. It quoted the 1959 Declaration, saying "Every child has a right to love and be loved".
Gaurav Jain v. Union of India (1997). Held: the children of sex workers have the right to equality of opportunity, dignity, care, protection and rehabilitation "without pre-stigma". The Court said the Constitution, the Universal Declaration and the Convention on the Rights of the Child must be made meaningful for them.
Strengths. The Convention binds India and gives the child rights in the child's own name. Its principles, especially best interests, now appear in Indian statutes.
Weaknesses. It has no court. Enforcement depends on State reports and national law. India has not joined the complaints Protocol, so an Indian child cannot complain to the Committee.
Conclusion. The international regime grew from the Geneva Declaration of 1924 and the 1959 Declaration. It became binding in the Convention of 1989, with its four general principles and Committee. The Optional Protocols and ILO Conventions 138 and 182 add protection against armed conflict, sexual exploitation and child labour. India has accepted these instruments, and its courts use them (Lakshmi Kant Pandey, Gaurav Jain).
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.
What should we fix or add?
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.