KSLU Solved Question Papers
Intellectual Property Rights II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 10
2014 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Intellectual Property Rights II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 10
2014 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2014 Dec examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2014 Dec examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2014 Dec examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: Part A, copyright: the definition in section 14, why it is a bundle that can be split (Video Master), and why owners deal in it through others; Part B, assignment: what may be assigned (section 18(1)), its effect (section 18(2)), its form and contents (section 19(1) to (3)), the default rules (section 19(4) to (6)), the 2012 safeguards for authors (provisos to section 18(1); section 19(8) to (10)), moral rights that survive (section 57; Mannu Bhandari), disputes before the Commercial Court (section 19A); Part C, licensing: voluntary licences (sections 30, 30A), exclusive and non-exclusive licences (sections 2(j), 54, 61), licensing through copyright societies (section 33; Novex, Azure Hospitality), licences imposed by law (sections 31 to 32A; Super Cassettes); a novel's journey as an illustration; assignment and licence compared; conclusion.
Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957 calls copyright "the exclusive right subject to the provisions of this Act, to do or authorise the doing of" listed acts. For a literary work these are reproducing, issuing copies, performing and communicating it. Making a film or sound recording of it, and translating and adapting it, are reserved too.
Three features make copyright easy to deal in.
Video Master v. Nishi Productions, 1998 (3) Bom CR 782. A producer gave one company the video and cable rights in a film, and later gave others the satellite broadcasting rights. The video right-holder sued.
Held. Each mode of communicating a film is a distinct right that can be separately assigned. The satellite grant did not infringe the video assignee's rights.
Most authors cannot print, film, translate or broadcast their own works. They earn by passing rights to publishers, producers and broadcasters. The Act offers two tools: assignment, which transfers ownership, and licence, which gives permission.
1. What may be assigned (section 18(1)). The owner of an existing work, or the prospective owner of a future one, may assign the copyright:
An assignment of a future work takes effect only when the work exists.
2. Effect (section 18(2)). For the rights assigned, the assignee becomes the owner. For the rights kept, the assignor remains owner. So after assigning only film rights, a novelist still owns the print rights.
3. Form and contents (section 19(1) to (3)). An assignment is valid only if it is in writing, signed by the assignor or his authorised agent. It must identify the work and state the rights assigned, the duration and the territory. It must also state the royalty and other consideration payable to the author or his heirs.
4. Default rules (section 19(4) to (6)).
5. Safeguards for authors added in 2012.
6. Moral rights stay with the author. The right to claim authorship, and to object to distortion harming his honour, survives assignment (section 57).
Mannu Bhandari v. Kala Vikas Pictures Pvt. Ltd., AIR 1987 Del 13. A novelist assigned the film rights in her novel "Aap Ka Bunty". The film distorted it, and she sued.
Held. Section 57 is independent of copyright, and an assignment contract must be read subject to it. Distortion harming the author's reputation is actionable even after assignment.
7. Disputes (section 19A). If an assignee fails to exercise the rights, or royalty is not paid, the assignor may complain. The Commercial Court, which has done this work since 2021, may revoke the assignment or settle royalty.
1. Voluntary licences (section 30). The owner, or the prospective owner of a future work, may grant any interest in a right by a licence in writing. The rules on form and disputes for assignments apply to licences too (section 30A). The licensee gets permission, not ownership.
2. Exclusive and non-exclusive licences. An exclusive licence gives the licensee a right to the exclusion of all others, including the owner (section 2(j)). An exclusive licensee may sue infringers as an owner can, but must join the owner (sections 54 and 61). A non-exclusive licensee merely shares the right and cannot sue.
3. Licensing through copyright societies. Section 33(1) bars anyone from carrying on the business of issuing or granting licences except through a registered copyright society. A society licenses on behalf of its members under a published tariff. The courts have differed on owners who license their own repertoire.
Novex Communication Pvt. Ltd. v. Lemon Tree Hotels Ltd., AIRONLINE 2019 DEL 96. An owner of sound recordings, not a registered society, sued a hotel that played them without a licence.
Held. The suit for infringement was maintainable. The court confined its ruling to the plaintiff's claim as owner of the recordings.
Azure Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. v. Phonographic Performance Ltd., Delhi High Court, Division Bench, 15 April 2025. PPL, then not a registered society, licensed sound recordings to hotels as their owner by assignment.
Held. Prima facie, the bar in section 33(1) is absolute. Anyone carrying on the business of licensing must be registered, whatever his ownership. The point is pending before the Supreme Court, and PPL was re-registered as a society in 2026.
4. Licences imposed by law. Some licences are granted without the owner's consent, on payment.
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. v. Music Broadcast Pvt. Ltd., (2012) 5 SCC 488. The Copyright Board granted radio stations interim compulsory licences while their applications were pending.
Held. No interim compulsory licence can be granted. Section 31 permits a licence only after the inquiry it prescribes.
| Step | Instrument | Rule applied |
|---|---|---|
| Author signs with a publisher for print rights in India for ten years | Partial assignment | Writing, rights, duration, territory, royalty (section 19) |
| Publisher allows a book club to print a cheaper edition | Licence | Section 30, in writing |
| Author gives a producer an exclusive film licence | Exclusive licence | Producer may sue pirates (sections 2(j), 54) |
| Film's songs use the author's poems | Royalty share kept | Provisos to section 18(1); section 19(9) |
| Step | Instrument | Rule applied |
|---|---|---|
| Audiobooks become popular years later | Not covered | Second proviso to section 18(1) |
| Publisher never prints | Rights lapse | Section 19(4); complaint under section 19A |
| Point | Assignment | Licence |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Transfers ownership of the rights assigned | Permits acts; ownership stays |
| Statute | Sections 18 and 19 | Sections 30 and 30A |
| Suing infringers | Assignee sues as owner | Only an exclusive licensee, joining the owner |
| Further dealing | Assignee may assign again | Licensee depends on the licence terms |
| Imposed by law | Never | Yes: compulsory and statutory licences |
Conclusion. Copyright is the exclusive right, subject to the Act, to do and authorise the acts section 14 lists. Because it is a divisible bundle of property, its owner can exploit it through others. An assignment transfers ownership of some or all rights, in signed writing, with statutory defaults and safeguards for authors. A licence only gives permission, voluntarily or by force of law, and only an exclusive licensee may sue.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.