munotes®

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) Sem 10 Environmental Law 2013 Dec Question Paper with Solutions

KSLU Solved Question Papers

Environmental Law

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 10

2013 Dec Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2013 Dec examination.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii
munotes.in iv
munotes.in v

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2013 Dec examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 100  ·  20 questions answered

Instructions printed on the paper

  • N.B. (1) Answer all 5 questions. (2) Figures to the right indicate marks. (3) One essay type and one short note question or problem from each Unit have to be attempted, which is referred as Part (a) and (b) in all the units. (4) Answers should be written either in English or Kannada Completely.

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in vi

Q1

Unit I

munotes.in 1

(a)What is Eco-system ? How does the ancient Indian law provides an insight into policies of forest and wildlife resources conservation ?[15]

Answer

For full marks, cover: Part I, the ecosystem in brief: meaning, the CBD Article 2 definition, its living and non-living parts, how it works, and why forests and wildlife are its keystones; Part II, the ancient Indian sources (the Vedas, the Dharmashastra, Kautilya's Arthashastra, Ashoka's edicts, sacred groves) and the eight policy insights they give on forest and wildlife conservation, each matched to its modern counterpart: State stewardship with an officer, forests zoned by use, sanctuaries where killing is barred, protected species, graded penalties, limits on harmful practices, sustained yield, and community conservation; the courts' use of this heritage (K.M. Chinnappa, Nagaraja, Rural Litigation); its limits (royal revenue, no rights against the ruler); a table; and a conclusion.

munotes.in 2

Part I: the ecosystem

Meaning. An ecosystem is a community of living organisms together with its physical setting. Energy flows and materials cycle within it, so that the whole works as one system. Article 2 of the Convention on Biological Diversity 1992 calls it "a dynamic complex of plant, animal and micro-organism communities and their non-living environment interacting as a functional unit".

Its parts. The non-living part is sunlight, air, water, soil and climate. The living part is made of producers (green plants), consumers (herbivores and carnivores) and decomposers (bacteria and fungi).

How it works. Plants capture the sun's energy, which passes along food chains to animals. Nutrients such as carbon and nitrogen return to the soil through decay and are used again. Predators keep the numbers of grazing animals in check, and plant cover holds soil and water. The result is ecological balance.

munotes.in 3

Why forests and wildlife matter most. A forest is the richest land ecosystem. It holds soil, feeds springs and rivers, stores carbon and shelters most land species. Wild animals keep the forest working: they pollinate, scatter seeds and control pests. So a policy to conserve forests and wildlife is a policy to conserve the ecosystem itself. That is the lens through which the ancient law is best read.

Part II: what the ancient Indian law teaches

The sources.

  1. The Vedas revere the earth, waters, plants and forests. The Atharva Veda's Prithvi Sukta treats the earth as mother, owed care, not ownership.
  2. The Dharmashastra, such as the Manusmriti, made injury to plants and trees a wrong with a penalty.
  3. Kautilya's Arthashastra, the Mauryan manual of statecraft, built a full administration for forests, animals and water.
  4. Ashoka's edicts, especially the fifth Pillar Edict of the third century B.C., published rules protecting named animals and forests.
  5. Sacred groves, kept by village communities, such as the devarakadu of Karnataka.
munotes.in 4

The policy insights.

1. Stewardship by the State, with an officer. The Arthashastra placed a Superintendent of Forests in charge of forest produce, plantations and forest workshops, with a parallel officer for animals. Conservation was a public function with a responsible official. Modern counterpart: forest officers under the Indian Forest Act 1927 and the Chief Wild Life Warden under the Wild Life (Protection) Act 1972.

2. Zoning forests by purpose. Kautilya distinguished forests for produce, forests reserved for the king, and forests set apart for ascetics and study. Modern counterpart: reserved, protected and village forests under the 1927 Act.

3. Sanctuaries where killing is barred. The abhayaranya, the "forest of safety", was an area in which animals could not be killed. Ashoka also forbade killing animals in certain reserves. Modern counterpart: sanctuaries and national parks under sections 18 and 35 of the Wild Life Act.

munotes.in 5

4. Protecting named species. Kautilya protected certain animals absolutely and made elephants a State monopoly, with their own forest, the hastivana. Ashoka's fifth Pillar Edict listed animals, birds and fish not to be killed. Modern counterpart: the Schedules of the Wild Life Act, and Project Elephant's elephant reserves.

5. Penalties graded by harm. Manu punished injury to plants. Kautilya graded the fine by the part of the tree harmed and by the kind of tree. Cutting a branch cost less than felling the trunk, and harming a fruit, shade or sacred tree cost more. Modern counterpart: graded offences such as section 26 of the 1927 Act. Section 51 of the Wild Life Act sets higher penalties for Schedule I animals.

6. Controlling harmful practices, not only species. Ashoka forbade burning forests "without reason", forbade burning chaff that contained living creatures, and restricted the branding and castration of animals on certain days. Modern counterpart: the fire offences in reserved forests (section 26 of the 1927 Act). There is also the general ban on hunting (section 9 of the Wild Life Act).

munotes.in 6

7. Use without exhaustion. The same Arthashastra that protected trees organised the regular harvest of timber and produce. Its aim was sustained yield: take the produce, keep the forest. Modern counterpart: working plans, and the principle of sustainable development.

8. Conservation by the community. Sacred groves, where no tree may be cut, show that conservation also rested on local belief and custom, not only on the king. Modern counterpart: community reserves under the Wild Life Act and biodiversity heritage sites under section 37 of the Biological Diversity Act 2002.

How the courts use this heritage

K.M. Chinnappa v. Union of India, (2002) 10 SCC 606. An iron ore company was mining inside the Kudremukh National Park in the Western Ghats. The Supreme Court allowed mining only until the end of 2005, under ecological conditions. It recalled that Manu prescribed punishments for injuring plants. It added that "Kautilya went a step further and fixed the punishment on the basis of importance of the part of the tree". It also cited Ashoka's decree against killing animals and burning forests.

munotes.in 7

Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja, (2014) 7 SCC 547. Jallikattu was challenged as cruelty to bulls. The Court drew on the Isha Upanishad's teaching that no creature is superior to another. It held that the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act gives animals rights, read with Article 51A(g).

Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1985 SC 652. The Court closed harmful limestone quarries in the Doon Valley to save its forests and springs. Natural resources must be used without destroying them, the same balance Kautilya struck.

The limits of the ancient law

  1. Its motive was revenue and royal power. Forests were protected as the king's assets, and elephants because they were military equipment.
  2. There were no rights against the ruler. A subject could not sue the king to protect a forest.
  3. Practice fell short of precept. Reverence did not prevent clearing and hunting.

Even so, the ancient law shows that India had environmental administration, with officers, zones, protected species and graded fines, long before the modern Acts.

At a glance

munotes.in 8
Ancient ruleModern counterpart
Superintendent of Forestsforest officers; Chief Wild Life Warden
Forests zoned by usereserved, protected and village forests
Abhayaranyasanctuaries and national parks (WLPA ss.18, 35)
Protected species; hastivanaSchedules of the WLPA; elephant reserves
Graded fines for treesIFA s.26; WLPA s.51
Ashoka's ban on burning forestsIFA s.26 fire offences; WLPA s.9
Sustained yieldworking plans; sustainable development
Sacred grovescommunity reserves; BDA s.37 heritage sites
munotes.in 9

Conclusion. An ecosystem is "a dynamic complex" of living communities and their environment "interacting as a functional unit", and forests and wildlife are its keystones. Ancient Indian law, through the Vedas, Manu, Kautilya's Arthashastra, Ashoka's edicts and sacred groves, gives eight lessons. They are a State officer, zoned forests, sanctuaries, protected species, graded penalties, limits on harmful practices, sustained yield and community care. Each has a modern counterpart, and the Supreme Court draws on them (Chinnappa, Nagaraja). Their limit is that they served the king's revenue and gave no rights against him.

munotes.in 10

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest come with the KSLU B.A. LL.B. Semester 10 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in

The question paper itself stays free.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!