munotes®

LLB 3 years Sem 6 Intellectual Property Laws May 2017 Question Paper with Solutions

Mumbai University Solved Question Papers

Intellectual Property Laws

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

LLB 3 years · Sem 6

May 2017 Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 24 October 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the May 2017 examination.

The answers in this volume state the law as it stands today, not as it stood when the paper was set. The Intellectual Property Appellate Board was abolished on 4 April 2021 by the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, so patent revocation petitions and appeals from the Controller and the Registrar now lie to the High Court, and the Copyright Board's work, including tariff appeals, lies with the Commercial Court. Since 1 August 2024 the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 has turned several trade mark and patent offences into penalties imposed by an adjudicating officer, and the 2026 Act omitted section 119 of the Patents Act from 1 June 2026. Medicines and chemicals have had product patents only since 1 January 2005, and every patent alive on 20 May 2003 runs twenty years from filing. The Supreme Court reversed the Madras ruling in Khoday Distilleries on 27 May 2008. Copyright cases decided before 2012 cite section 52 by its old letters.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii
munotes.in iv

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the May 2017 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 100  ·  25 questions answered

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in v

Q.1

Q.1: Answer in two to three sentences each

20 Marks - 2 marks each

munotes.in 1

(a)What is a 'Collective Mark'?[2]

Answer

Definition. Section 2(1)(g) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 says that a collective mark "means a trade mark distinguishing the goods or services of members of an association of persons (not being a partnership within the meaning of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932) which is the proprietor of the mark from those of others".

In simple words. It is a mark owned by an association and used by its members. It tells buyers that the goods come from a member of that association. Examples are marks of a co-operative of handloom weavers, or of a chartered accountants' body.

Special rules (Chapter VIII, sections 61 to 68).

  1. The application must be filed with regulations (section 63). They state who may use the mark, the conditions of membership, and the conditions of use, including sanctions for misuse.
  2. A mark likely to be taken as something other than a collective mark is not registered (section 62).
  3. It may be removed if the association misuses it or lets members misuse it (section 68).
munotes.in 2

Collective and certification marks differ. A collective mark shows membership. A certification mark shows that goods meet a standard, and may be used by anyone who passes the test.

Case. In Power Control Appliances v. Sumeet Machines Pvt. Ltd., (1994) 2 SCC 448, family members split and both used the mark SUMEET for mixers. The Supreme Court held that a mark normally has "one mark, one source and one proprietor". A collective mark is the law's controlled exception: one proprietor, the association, many authorised users.

munotes.in 3

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest come with the LL.B. 3 Years Semester 6 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in

Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499

The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!