Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Interpretation of Statutes
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLB 3 years · Sem 5
Dec 2014 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Interpretation of Statutes
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLB 3 years · Sem 5
Dec 2014 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 28 September 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the Dec 2014 examination.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the Dec 2014 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the Dec 2014 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 24 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer the following in not more than two sentence each
all · 20 Marks
Answer
An absurdity is a result so unreasonable, self-contradictory or repugnant to the rest of the Act that the legislature cannot have intended it. It is the trigger for the golden rule of construction.
Grey v. Pearson (1857) 6 HLC 61 states the rule. The grammatical and ordinary sense of the words is to be adhered to unless it leads to some absurdity, repugnance or inconsistency with the rest of the instrument, in which case the ordinary sense may be modified so far as is necessary to avoid that result, and no further.
So absurdity does not entitle the court to rewrite the section. It permits a departure measured by the absurdity itself.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.