Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
CPC
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLB 3 years · Sem 5
Apr 2015 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
CPC
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLB 3 years · Sem 5
Apr 2015 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 29 September 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the Apr 2015 examination.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the Apr 2015 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the Apr 2015 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
3 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
Costs are the expenses of the litigation, and the Code deals with them in sections 35, 35A and 35B. Section 35(1) says that the costs of and incident to all suits shall be in the discretion of the Court, and that the Court shall have full power to determine by whom or out of what property and to what extent such costs are to be paid. The same sub-section adds that the fact that the Court has no jurisdiction to try the suit shall be no bar to the exercise of such powers, so a court that returns a plaint can still deal with costs.
The ordinary rule is that costs follow the event, meaning the loser pays the winner. It is a rule of practice, not an absolute right, because the power is discretionary. Section 35(2) puts one control on that discretion: where the Court directs that any costs shall not follow the event, the Court shall state its reasons in writing.
Costs are of three kinds under the Code. General costs under section 35 are the successful party's court fees, pleader's fees, witness expenses and the like. Compensatory costs under section 35A are awarded against a party who has put forward a claim or defence that is false or vexatious to his knowledge, and they are capped at three thousand rupees or the court's pecuniary limit, whichever is less. Costs for causing delay under section 35B reimburse the other side for a wasted hearing, and their payment is made a condition precedent to the defaulter carrying on with his suit or his defence.
Going deeper.
Keep the three sections apart, because students often merge them. Section 35 is compensatory in the ordinary sense: it indemnifies the winner for what the litigation cost him. Section 35A is punitive: it is aimed at the litigant who knowingly pleads a falsehood, and it is why the court must record its reasons for holding the claim or defence false or vexatious. Section 35B is disciplinary: it does not look at who wins, only at who wasted the day fixed for hearing.
Two details carry marks. Section 35A applies to a suit or other proceeding including an execution proceeding but excluding an appeal or a revision, and under section 35A(3) an order under it does not exempt the person from criminal liability for the false claim. Under section 35B(2), costs ordered for delay are not included in the costs awarded by the decree if they are paid, but if they are not paid a separate executable order is drawn up.
What the examiner is looking for.
Two sentences in the exam, as the paper asks: costs are the expenses of the litigation, they lie in the discretion of the court under section 35 and ordinarily follow the event, and the Code adds compensatory costs under section 35A and costs for delay under section 35B. Naming all three sections is what separates a full two marks from one.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.