munotes®

BLS LLB 5 Years Sem 6 Law of Crimes Nov 2010 Question Paper with Solutions

Mumbai University Solved Question Papers

Law of Crimes

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 6

Nov 2010 Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 17 October 2026.

This edition revised 26 October 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the Nov 2010 examination.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii
munotes.in iv
munotes.in v

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the Nov 2010 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 100  ·  25 questions answered

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in vi

SECTION I

Answer in not more than two sentences, all 10 20 Marks

munotes.in 1

1.State any two offences which are an exception to the doctrine of Mens Rea.[2]

Answer

The maxim actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea states a basic rule. An act does not make a person guilty unless the mind is also guilty. The maxim is a rule of construction, so the legislature may exclude it. Where it does, the offence is one of strict liability, and no guilty mind need be proved. Any two of the following may be given.

  1. Offences under foreign exchange and customs law. In State of Maharashtra v. Mayer Hans George, AIR 1965 SC 722, the Supreme Court held that knowledge of a Reserve Bank notification need not be proved. Reading in a mental element would have frustrated the object of preventing smuggling.
  2. Offences relating to adulterated food and drugs, where the statute protects public health and proof of knowledge would make it unenforceable.
  3. Public nuisance, where the harm is to the public at large.
  4. Offences relating to weights and measures, now under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009.
munotes.in 2

The test is not that the statute is welfare legislation. In Nathulal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1966 SC 43, the Court held that a guilty mind is excluded only where the object of the statute would otherwise be defeated.

munotes.in 3

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest come with the B.L.S. LL.B. 5 Years Semester 6 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in

Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499

The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!