BLS LLB 5 Years Sem 1 English 1 2025-26 - ATKT Set 2 60/40 Question Paper with Solutions

The speaker is Roxy, the slave woman in Mark Twain's Pudd'nhead Wilson. The words are written in the dialect Twain gives her, meaning "The Lord have mercy on me, poor miserable sinner that I am."

The sin she is confessing is the exchange of the two babies in the cradle. Roxy, nurse to both her own son and her master's, swapped the infants when they were a few months old, so that her son was brought up as the free heir Tom Driscoll and the true heir was raised as the slave "Chambers".

The "noble judge" is Portia, appearing in the trial scene of Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice disguised as Balthazar, a young doctor of laws from Rome. Shylock addresses her as a wise and upright judge because, at that stage, she has ruled that the bond is forfeit and that the law is on his side.

The bond is the agreement between Shylock and Antonio: Shylock lent three thousand ducats for three months without interest, on the condition that if the money was not repaid on the day, the forfeit would be a pound of Antonio's flesh, to be cut off nearest his heart.

The text is Mark Twain's Pudd'nhead Wilson, and the speaker is David "Pudd'nhead" Wilson, appearing for the Italian twins at their trial for the murder of Judge Driscoll.

"The claim" is the prosecution's central contention: that the person whose hand left the blood-stained finger-prints on the handle of the Indian knife is the person who committed the murder. Wilson describes it as the claim given the front place and most aggressively insisted upon by the prosecution, and then, instead of disputing it, says: "We grant that claim." A moment later he adds that he does not merely grant it but welcomes and strongly endorses it.

Answer: Dr Austin Bond asked her whether she had cleaned the window there that day.

The changes made, and why:

Answer: He shall never quit his current position in the company, shall he?

The rule applied: the statement contains the negative word never, so it counts as a negative statement and therefore takes a positive tag. The auxiliary shall is repeated without not, and the subject is already the pronoun he.

Who he is

Lomax Harder is the central character of Arnold Bennett's short story "Murder!" He is a poet: cultivated, sensitive, quietly spoken and physically unimpressive, a man of the study rather than of the world. He is attached to Emily, and it is that attachment which sets the story moving, because Emily is bound to John Franting.

His qualities

1. Refined and intellectual. Harder belongs to the world of books and feeling, and everything in his manner suggests a man incapable of violence. Bennett establishes this carefully so that what follows will be a shock.

2. Quietly and deeply emotional. His love for Emily is genuine and his loathing of Franting is not hot temper but a settled judgment on a man he regards as a brute.

3. Deliberate and cool-headed. This is the quality the story turns on. Harder does not lash out. He thinks, prepares and acts with a composure far more disturbing than rage would be, and afterwards he is meticulous about physical detail.

The two words

O. Henry's title names the two forces acting on Soapy, the homeless man at the centre of the story. The Cop stands for the law in its outward, coercive form: arrest, the magistrate, Blackwell's Island. The Anthem stands for conscience and memory: the church music that reaches him through an open window.

Why the title fits

1. The plot is Soapy's pursuit of the Cop. Winter is coming and he wants three months' shelter in prison, which he prefers to charity because charity costs him his self-respect. He tries to be arrested by dining without money, breaking a window, causing a disturbance, taking an umbrella and behaving offensively. Every attempt fails.

2. The Anthem arrives unsought. Outside a quiet old church at night he hears an organ playing an anthem he knew as a boy. It brings back his mother, roses, ambitions and clean thoughts, and produces in a moment what a whole day of scheming could not: he resolves to find work and reclaim his life.

The idea

For Dr B. R. Ambedkar a "New Social Order" meant rebuilding Indian society on equality in place of the graded inequality of caste. He held that political independence would change nothing if the social order beneath it remained as it was.

The requisites

1. Liberty, equality and fraternity together. Not three separate goods: liberty without equality gives the rule of the strong, equality without liberty kills initiative, and neither survives without fraternity, which he treated as the real meaning of democracy.

2. The annihilation of caste. Caste is not a division of labour but a division of labourers, arranged in an ascending order of reverence and a descending order of contempt, and it destroys fellow-feeling at the root.

What he means

In "The Joy of Reading", Dr A. P. J. Abdul Kalam argues that every household should keep a home library. He does not mean a grand room with glass cases. He means a shelf of books in an ordinary house, chosen by the family and available to the children without permission being asked.

His views

1. A book within reach is read; a book elsewhere is not. Children read what is lying about, so availability, not exhortation, is what produces readers.

2. The habit must be formed early, while it can still be formed. A child who grows up among books treats reading as ordinary rather than as a task set by a teacher.

3. It is the cheapest investment a family can make. Kalam presses the economic point deliberately: a shelf of books costs very little against what it returns, and it is within reach of households of modest means. He came from one.

I am a first-year student of the five-year B.L.S. LL.B. course at ____ Law College, Mumbai. My coursework in Legal Method, Legal Language and Economics has given me a grounding in legal research, drafting and case analysis, and I have completed a certificate course in legal writing. I am familiar with SCC Online and Manupatra, and I have taken part in two intra-collegiate moot court competitions, reaching the semi-final in the second.

I am particularly interested in your firm's civil and commercial litigation practice, and I would be glad to assist with research, case briefs, indexing and any drafting entrusted to me under supervision. I am available for six weeks from 1 June 2026 and can attend court with your juniors as required.

My bio-data is enclosed. I would welcome the opportunity of an interview at your convenience.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,
Rohan Kulkarni

Encl.: Bio-data

---

Model answer

Rohan Kulkarni
Village Wadgaon, Taluka Bhor
District Pune 412206

11 May 2026

The Sarpanch
Gram Panchayat, Wadgaon
Taluka Bhor, District Pune 412206

Subject: Complaint regarding the acute shortage of drinking water in Wadgaon village

Sir/Madam,

I write on behalf of the residents of the eastern hamlet of our village to bring to your urgent attention the shortage of drinking water we have faced since the middle of March.

This complaint has been signed by thirty-eight households and copies are being sent to the Block Development Officer and to the Executive Engineer of the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran. Should no action follow within fifteen days, we shall be constrained to petition the Zilla Parishad.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,
Rohan Kulkarni
(On behalf of the residents of the eastern hamlet, Wadgaon)

Encl.: List of signatories

What it means

Women's empowerment is the process by which women acquire the capacity and the freedom to make choices about their own lives and to act on them: over their education, work, money, marriage, childbearing, movement and political voice. It is not charity extended to women but the removal of the obstacles that prevented them exercising rights they already had.

What the twenty-first century has changed for the better

1. Education. The gap in school enrolment between girls and boys has closed almost entirely at the primary level, and women now outnumber men in many university courses in India, including law.

2. Political representation. Reservation of one-third of seats in Panchayats and Municipalities under the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments has put more than a million women into elected office, and several States have raised it to fifty per cent. The Women's Reservation Act, 2023 provides for one-third reservation in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies.

What has not changed

1. Female labour force participation remains low and has, on some measures, fallen, which is the single most stubborn statistic in the field. 2. Unpaid work. Women do the overwhelming share of housework and care, which is not counted in national income and not shared. 3. Safety. Violence at home and harassment in public remain widespread, and conviction rates are low. 4. Sex ratio and son preference persist despite the PCPNDT Act, 1994. 5. Representation at the top of business, the judiciary and the senior bar remains thin, even where entry-level numbers are equal. 6. Law outruns practice. A right that a woman cannot enforce without money, time and family support is a right on paper.

Conclusion

The twenty-first century has given Indian women formal equality and rising education, and has not yet given them economic independence or safety. Empowerment is therefore unfinished rather than achieved, and what remains is the harder half, because it depends on changing households rather than statutes.

5. Accessibility for students with disabilities, through speech-to-text, text-to-speech and adaptive material.

6. For a law student specifically: fast case summaries, plain explanations of doctrine, and practice questions, all available at midnight before an examination.

Its dangers

1. It states falsehoods confidently. These systems generate fluent text without knowing whether it is true, and in law they invent case names, citations and holdings that do not exist. Lawyers abroad have been sanctioned for filing such citations.

2. It substitutes for thinking. A student who submits generated work has outsourced the process that the assignment existed to develop. Writing is how one finds out whether one understands.

3. Assessment becomes hard to trust, which pushes institutions back towards closed-book examinations.

4. Bias and opacity. The systems reproduce what is in their training data, and neither the student nor the teacher can inspect the reasoning.

5. Privacy. Student data and submitted work go to servers governed by terms nobody reads.

2. He selects the only defence the law allows

The act is undisputed and public, so there is no factual defence. Jake pleads insanity under the M'Naghten rule: that at the time of the act the accused did not know the nature and quality of what he was doing, or did not know it was wrong. Provocation would fail, because the killings were planned and carried out days after the attack, which destroys the sudden loss of self-control that doctrine requires. Insanity is the only route by which the jury may lawfully weigh what was done to the child.

3. He builds and defends the expert evidence

Dr W. T. Bass testifies for the defence, Dr Rodeheaver for the State, and the prosecution damages Bass's credibility with a disclosure about his past. Jake's refusal to rest the case on a single expert is the practical lesson of the trial.

4. He fights the procedural ground

He moves unsuccessfully for a change of venue, contests the jury's composition, and faces District Attorney Rufus Buckley, an able and politically ambitious prosecutor.

Introduction

The trial scene of The Merchant of Venice (Act IV, Scene i) brings to a head a quarrel that has been building through the whole play. Antonio, a Venetian merchant, has forfeited a bond to Shylock, a Jewish moneylender, and the penalty is a pound of his flesh. The dispute is a contract case in form and something quite different in substance.

1. The roots of the conflict

Commercial. Antonio lends money without interest and so undercuts Shylock's trade. Shylock says as much: Antonio "lends out money gratis and brings down the rate of usance here in Venice."

Religious and personal. Antonio has spat on Shylock, called him a dog and abused him publicly on the Rialto. Shylock recalls it in detail, and Antonio does not deny it; he says he is likely to do it again.

Domestic. By the time of the trial Shylock's daughter Jessica has eloped with a Christian, taking his money and his dead wife's ring.

4. The turn, and the judgment

Portia defeats the bond on its own words: it grants flesh but no blood, and not "one jot" more or less than a pound on peril of his life and goods. She then produces the alien statute, under which an alien who seeks the life of a Venetian forfeits half his goods to the intended victim and half to the State, his life lying at the Duke's mercy.

The Duke spares his life. Antonio's terms are that Shylock make over his property at his death to Jessica and Lorenzo, and that he become a Christian. Shylock leaves the court saying only that he is not well.

Conclusion

The conflict is commercial in origin, religious in character and personal in expression, and the trial ends it by force rather than by reason. Shylock is right on the law and wrong in his purpose; Antonio is sympathetic in his danger and indefensible in his earlier conduct. Shakespeare allows neither a clean victory.

The evidence

1. The prints on the knife handle. The weapon carries clear finger-marks belonging to neither twin. That alone destroys the prosecution case.

2. The scientific proposition. Before the marks mean anything Wilson must persuade a sceptical court of the method. He explains that every person carries "physiological autographs" on the fingers, that no two have been found alike, and that they do not change from birth to death.

3. A courtroom demonstration. He takes prints from members of the jury and the audience and identifies their owners without being told, converting an assertion into a proof the court can watch.

4. The twenty-year archive. The demonstration works only because he holds dated records of the same people taken years apart, which is what establishes the "unchanging" half of the claim. The hobby the town laughed at is the evidentiary foundation of the defence.

5. The identification of the marks as Tom Driscoll's, by matching the knife prints against his slide.

The occasion

Plato's Apology records the trial of Socrates at Athens in 399 B.C., before a court of several hundred citizens. The word "apology" means defence, not an expression of regret.

The charges

Two, formally: that Socrates did not acknowledge the gods the city acknowledged and introduced new divinities, and that he corrupted the youth of Athens. Behind them lay years of accumulated resentment and the political atmosphere of a city recently defeated in war and briefly ruled by tyrants, several of whom had been associated with him.

3. His refusal to plead in the usual way

He will not weep, produce his children, or beg. He tells the court he will obey the god rather than them, and will not give up questioning while he has breath, because "the unexamined life is not worth living." He compares himself to a gadfly stinging a large and sluggish horse, and warns that in killing him they will not easily find another.

4. The verdict and the penalty

He is convicted by a modest majority. Required to propose a counter-penalty, he first suggests, seriously, that what he deserves is maintenance in the Prytaneum at public expense, the honour given to Olympic victors. Only at his friends' urging does he offer a fine. The court sentences him to death, and the second vote is more heavily against him than the first.

5. His words after sentence

To those who condemned him he prophesies that killing him will not silence criticism: younger and harsher critics will follow, whom he had been restraining, and the way to escape censure is not to silence the critic but to become better.