LL.B. (Three Years) Sem 6 Law of Evidence May 2016 Question Paper - Mumbai University | munotes

Questions asked in this paper

• (2) Figures to the right indicate full marks

1. Q1 Answer each of the following in one or two sentences
   • (b) Define a digital signature
   • (c) Differentiate between a statement and confession “an (d) Whatis evidentiary value of an accomplice
   • (e) Opinion of expert, when relevant
   • (f) In what circumstances leading questions can not be asked
   • (g) What is hostile witness
   • (h) Presumption as to dowry death
   • (i) facts not otherwise relevant becomes relevant
   • (j) What is Res Gestae
2. Q2 Write short notes on any four of the following : 20 marks
   • (a) Critically comment on facts which need not tobe proved
   • (b) Explain with examples proved, disproved proved
   • (c) Statement of persons who can not be as witness
   • (d) Doctrine of estoppel
   • (e) Conclusive proof
   • (f) Burden of proof
3. Q3 Solve any two of the following reasons : 12 marks
   • (i) Advocate Tanaji was in the criminal case against a pauper, by magistrate The Advocate the case at trial and found that the witness tendered by prosecution is a person and prosecutor himself was narrating to court what that has seen at the scene of offence
   • (a) witness testify in a case at the Court?
   • (b) the prosecutor Correct? Justify hat should have he done?
   • (ii) Mr. ay was suspected of murder of Miss Karuna. He was apprehended by p and brought to the police station. The police inspector was well built had a rough voice and appearance. Being afraid that he would beat, Mr. Akshay gave in writing to the Police inspector, while in his custody, that "I have murdered Miss Karuna with a knife and I have hidden it in an old house, I can show it to you if you take me there". In this situation
   • (a) What portion if any is admissible in evidence out of the statement by Mr. Akshay to police?
   • (b) What is the reason why the entire statement can not be accepted in
   • (iii) Priti agrees in writing to sell a horse to pradeep for Rs. 1,000 or Rs. 1,500
   • (a) Whether evidence can be given to show which price was to be given?
   • (b) Give reason with provision
4. Q4 Answer in detail (Any Four) Ky 48 marks
   • (a) Explain and distinguish between direct evidence and circumstantial
   • (b) Explain in detail kinds of confession and consequence of a confession,
   • (c) the meaning of relevant facts under Evidence Act ? examples and also case law, if any
   • (d) Hearsay evidence is no evidence, Explain this preposition. Ate there any What is dying declaration and its evidential
   • (f) What is primary evidence and secondary evidence? Hw to prove primary and secondary evidence ? When secondary evidence given
   • (3) yea arm
   • (3) aed gay
   • (a) What portion if any is admissible in evidence out of the statement by Mr. Akshay to police?
   • (b) What is the reason why the entire statement can not be accepted in
   • (iii) Priti agrees in writing to sell a horse to pradeep for Rs. 1,000 or Rs. 1,500
   • (a) Whether evidence can be given to show which price was to be given?
   • (b) Give reason with provision
5. Q4 Answer in detail (Any Four) 48 marks
   • (a) Explain and distinguish between direct evidence and circumstantial
   • (b) Explain in detail kinds of confession and consequence ofa
   • (c) the meaning of relevant facts under Evidence Act? examples and also case law, if any
   • (d) Hearsay evidence is no evidence, Explain this preposition. Ate there any
   • (e) dying declaration and its evidential value?
   • (f) What is primary evidence and secondary evidence? HOw to prove primary and secondary evidence ? When secondary evidence given,
   • (3) (ae
6. Q2 fon ar)

Read from the scan above, so a character or two may differ. The scan is the original.