LLB 3 Years Sem 6 Law Of Evidence Nov 2013 EVEIDENCE Question Paper - Mumbai University | munotes

Questions asked in this paper

1. Q1 in two or three sentences of each of the following 20 marks
2. Q1 Explain the term “Res Gestae” ?
3. Q2 Define “evidence” ?
4. Q3 What is the “digital signature” ?
5. Q4 Explain where the Indian Evidence Act is not applicable ?
6. Q5 Differentiate between “Judgment in rem” and “judgment in personam” ?
7. Q6 Explain the terms “Confession” and “Admission” ?
8. Q7 When the character of accused is relevant ?
9. Q8 How the witness is “hostile” ?
10. Q9 Who is an “Accomplice” ? When his evidence leads to: his conviction ?
11. Q10 is “hearsay evidence” ? How it is admissible ? Write Short notes of the following : (Any four) (20)
    • a) Production of documents
    • b) Presumptions
    • c) Conspiracy
    • d) Differentiate between onus of proof and burden of proof
    • e) Examination of witness any two of the following with reasons or justification (12)
12. Q1 Dr. Deshmukh in his maternity Hospital maintains records of delivery of X’s mother in his presence where baby is a male child has been recorded in the
    • a) Under what provisions of evidence of law will be applicable in the instant case ?
    • b) Why and how the records maintain by hospital are relevant ? A lawyer received certain instructions from his client as legal adviser, which is confidential in nature. In the absence of the client the lawyer was called to lead evidence of confidential information
    • a) Is the iawyer liable to disclose the same ?
    • b) If not, how the lawyer is protected under the evidence law ? Mrs. Rohini Balchandran in her suicide note dated 07.12.2011 which was found near her body next day i.e. 08.12.2011, wherein she had pointed out her husband responsible for physical torture as well.as mental harassment regularly till her
    • a) Does the statement made in suicide note has evidentiary value ?
    • b) If so, which are the provisions of Evidence Law applicable in the instant case ? Answer in details of the following :- (Any Four) (48)
    • a) Clarify and distinguished between direct evidence and circumstantial evidence ?
    • b) Explain the context of the judicial notice and narrate all those facts which need not be proved with suitabie example ?
    • c) Identify in detail as to the presumption of documents under the law of evidence ?
    • d) What are different kind of estoppel and distinguished with res judicata ?
    • e) Provisions of evidence law dealing with leading questions be explained in detail ? which are the questions can legally be asked in these circumstances ?
    • f) When the evidence of expert are relevant and explain their relevancy with reference to handwriting, digital signature and opinion of the expert ?
13. Q2 carat
    • a. wal at

Read from the scan above, so a character or two may differ. The scan is the original.