munotes®

LLB 3 Years Sem 6 Law Of Evidence Apr 2011 Question Paper - Mumbai University | munotes

Law Of Evidence Question Paper, Apr 2011.pdf
SEM 6 · 26 Jan 2026

Loading PDF...

Questions asked in this paper

  • N.B. (1) Attempt all questions
  • (2) Figures to the right indicate the marks allotted
  1. Q1 Answer the following in not more than two lines :— 20 marks
    • (a) Define an admission
    • (b) When is the opinion of a Handwriting Expert relevant ?
    • (c) State the main legal position of a Dumb witness
    • (d) What is a leading question ? When it cannot be asked ?
    • (e) Explain in short in and ‘Judgements in Personam’
    • (f) What is the evidentiary value of an accomplice ?
    • (g) Explain in short Power of Court to put questions and effect thereupon
    • (h) When of a witness can be asked for ?
    • (i) To which Proceedings the Evidence Act is not applicable ? What is the necessity and scope of Cross Examination of a witness ?
  2. Q2 Write short notes on any four :— 20 marks
    • (a) Relevancy of opinion as to right, custom and usages
    • (b) Production of documents during the trial
    • (c) Evidential value of a public document
    • (d) Explain the burden of proof with reference to cases pertaining to
    • (i) Partners interse (ii) Principal and agent and (iii) Death of a person
    • (e) Critically comment on facts which need not be proved
    • (f) Explain the presumptions under the Evidence Act
  3. Q3 Solve any two of the following with reasons or justification :— 12 marks
    • (a) Dilip made a statement to a police that he has cut the throat of his wife with a knife said knife is lying in a water tank which is in the kitchen. In consequence of the said statement, the police found the knife at the place indicated in the statement
    • (i) Which part of the statement is admissible ?
    • (ii) Which part of the statement is not admissible ?
    • (b) Ashok who is an accused for the offence of murder, issued a letter to a police. officer explaining therein how he has committed the murder
    • (i) Whether this letter of Ashok can be called a confession ?
    • (ii) What is the evidential value of the said letter ?
    • (c) Alawyer in the course of his employment as a legal adviser, received certain information and instructions, from his client, which was confidential in nature. After the death of the said client, the lawyer was called upon to give evidence and to disclose certain information received from the
    • (i) Is the lawyer permitted to do so ?
    • (ii) How is the lawyer psotected under the Evidence Act, in the above Answer in full details any four 48
    • (a) Explain the burden of proof relating to ownership, birth, marriage and
    • (b) Explain in detail kinds of confessions and consequences of a confession
    • (c) What is dying declaration and its evidential value ?
    • (d) Explain in detail what is Estoppel and distinguish it from admission
    • (e) evidence and documentary evidence are the foundation stones of any trial’. Comment
    • (f) Explain and distinguish between Direct Evidence and Circumstantial

Read from the scan above, so a character or two may differ. The scan is the original.

Report or request

Something wrong on this page? Report it and we will check it against the scan.

Quick Help

No. The full paper opens straight away, with no login and nothing to pay.

Something wrong with this paper? Report it.

Connected Papers
LLB 3 Years / Sem 6 · 145 papers
Browse all →
Questions? Email contact@munotes.in
Done!
Done!