The UNESCO Trilogy of 1997, 2003 and 2005
Chapter One Hundred Thirty-Eight
Syllabus topic 6, "Impact of Scientific and Technological Progress on Human Rights : Normative Response of the International Community."
Pages 897 to 903 of 951
In one line
Three declarations in eight years, each answering a question the last one had not been asked, and the shortest of them is the strictest.
In the wording a student can write in an exam: UNESCO's General Conference adopted the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights in 1997, the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data in 2003, and the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights in 2005; all three are declarations and not treaties, so none binds; they protect different objects, being respectively the genome, the data, and the person in the whole field of medicine and the life sciences; and their limitation clauses differ, article 9 of the 1997 Declaration being the stricter in requiring compelling reasons where article 27 of the 2005 Declaration requires only that a limitation be by law.
The three, and what each was for
1997: the genome
The occasion. The Human Genome Project was under way and the mapping of the human genome was in prospect. The question nobody had had to answer was what the genome is in law: a substance, an inheritance, a person's property, or something else.
The answer. Article 1 declares that the human genome underlies the fundamental unity of all members of the human family, as well as the recognition of their inherent dignity and diversity, and that in a symbolic sense, it is the heritage of humanity. [The Genome and Human Dignity] works it.
What it produced. Twenty-five articles on dignity, non-discrimination, consent, confidentiality, the right not to know, research and its limits, solidarity and implementation. Its article 11 prohibits practices which are contrary to human dignity, such as reproductive cloning of human beings, and its article 24 charges the International Bioethics Committee with identifying such practices, such as germ-line interventions.
2003: the data
The occasion. Sequencing became cheap and biobanks became large, so the question shifted from what the genome is to what may be done with the information derived from it.
The answer. The 2003 Declaration is about a thing that can be copied, linked, moved and stored, which the genome cannot. Its structure follows the life cycle of data: collection, processing, use, storage and destruction.
What it produced. Twenty-seven articles, of which the ones the book uses most are article 8 on prior, free, informed and express consent, article 9 on withdrawal, article 14 on privacy and confidentiality, article 16 on change of purpose, article 18 on circulation across borders, and article 19 on benefit sharing. [Genetic Data: What It Is and Why It Is Special] and the three chapters after it work them.
The rest of this chapter
Module one is free. The rest of LL.M. Human Rights Law Semester 3 is part of the bundle.
You are reading a chapter from a later module. Everything in module one of every subject stays free, and so does every question paper and the syllabus.
See the semester for ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Free either way: question papers, the syllabus, and module one of every subject.
The rest of this subject
These notes are cut from the University's printed syllabus. Open the syllabus itself, or the past papers, for the same subject.