KSLU Solved Question Papers
Intellectual Property Rights I
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 9
2016 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Intellectual Property Rights I
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 9
2016 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2016 Jun examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2016 Jun examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2016 Jun examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: corporeal and incorporeal property; why intellectual property is intangible (a creation of the mind, not its physical carrier; R.G. Anand: no right in ideas, only in their expression); why it is still "property" (rights to exclude, transfer, devolution, mortgage, protection by law; Patents Act section 50(5); Article 300A); the consequences of intangibility, in six points: (1) no possession, so registers (and copyright without registration, Burroughs Wellcome); (2) no delivery, so written assignments (Patents Act section 68; Copyright Act section 19; Trade Marks Act section 2(1)(b)); (3) copying is not theft (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, section 303), so special remedies (Microsoft Corporation v. Yogesh Papat); (4) non-rival use and the need for limits (Entertainment Network); (5) a limited term; (6) territorial reach (Penguin Books; Toyota); the thing and the right are separate; a comparison table; the conclusion.
Property is of two kinds.
Intellectual property belongs to the second kind. It is "intangible" because it cannot be touched. It is "incorporeal" because the law gives it no body; it is a bundle of rights.
What the owner owns is not the book, the bottle or the machine. It is the creation of the mind that the object carries: the literary work, the brand, the invention. The physical copy is only its vehicle.
The law protects the form in which an idea is expressed, not the bare idea. In R.G. Anand v. Delux Films, AIR 1978 SC 1613, the author of the play "Hum Hindustani" sued the makers of the film "New Delhi", which was also about provincial prejudice. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. There is no copyright in an idea, theme or plot, only in its form and manner of expression. So even within intellectual property, the subject matter is defined in abstract terms, not by any physical thing.
An intangible right is property because it has the incidents of ownership.
1. No possession, so registers. Nobody can prove ownership by holding a patent or a mark. So the law keeps public registers: of patents, of trade marks, of designs and of GIs. Copyright is the exception. It arises on creation, and registration is optional (Copyright Act, section 45). In Burroughs Wellcome (India) Ltd. v. Uni-Sole Pvt. Ltd., 1997 3 MhLJ 914, the Bombay High Court held that no provision of the Copyright Act deprives an author of his rights for want of registration.
2. No delivery, so writing. A car passes with its keys. An intangible right cannot be handed over. So an assignment, licence or mortgage of a patent is valid only in writing, duly executed (Patents Act, section 68). An assignment of copyright must be in writing signed by the assignor (Copyright Act, section 19(1)). A trade mark "assignment" means an assignment in writing (Trade Marks Act, section 2(1)(b)).
3. Copying is not theft, so special remedies. Theft is the dishonest taking of movable property out of another's possession (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, section 303(1)). A copier takes nothing out of anyone's possession; the owner still has his work. So infringement is a civil wrong under each Act, with offences created by the Acts themselves. The main remedies are injunctions, damages measured by lost sales, and accounts of profits.
The loss from copying is real even though nothing is taken. In Microsoft Corporation v. Yogesh Papat, 2005 (30) PTC 245 (Del), the defendants loaded unlicensed Microsoft software onto computers they sold. Microsoft still had its software. The Delhi High Court granted injunctions and awarded Rs 19.75 lakh as damages for loss of profit.
4. Non-rival use, so limits. Many people can use an idea at once without using it up. That makes exclusive rights both valuable to the owner and costly to the public. The law therefore limits them, for example by compulsory licences. In Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd., (2008) 13 SCC 30, a radio station sought a compulsory licence to broadcast songs. The Supreme Court held that copyright is a statutory monopoly. Refusing a licence on unreasonable terms can amount to withholding a work from the public, which the Copyright Board may remedy.
5. A limited term. Land is owned without limit of time. Intellectual property lasts only for the statutory term. A patent lasts twenty years (Patents Act, section 53). Most copyright lasts for the author's life plus sixty years (Copyright Act, section 22). A trade mark is registered for ten years at a time, renewable without limit (Trade Marks Act, section 25). When a patent or copyright ends, the subject matter passes to the public. A trade mark lasts only while it is renewed and used.
6. Territorial reach. Land is protected where it lies. An intangible right exists only in the country whose law grants it. In Penguin Books Ltd. v. India Book Distributors, AIR 1985 Del 29, the defendants imported American editions, lawfully printed in the United States, into India, where Penguin held the exclusive rights. The Delhi High Court restrained the imports. Trade marks too are territorial (Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. Prius Auto Industries Ltd., (2018) 2 SCC 1).
The physical object and the intellectual property in it are two separate pieces of property.
| Movable property | Intellectual property | |
|---|---|---|
| Subject matter | A physical thing | A creation of the mind |
| Possession | Possible | Impossible |
| Use by many at once | No | Yes |
| Proof of ownership | Possession | Registers (copyright: none needed) |
| Transfer | Delivery | Written assignment |
| Wrong done by taking | Theft | Infringement |
| Duration | Until the thing perishes | The statutory term |
| Reach | Goes with the goods | Only where granted |
Conclusion. Intellectual property is a right "in the nature of intangible incorporeal property". It has no body, and its subject matter is the expression of an idea, not the idea or the physical copy (R.G. Anand). It is still true property: it can be exclusively enjoyed, assigned, licensed, mortgaged and inherited, and taken away only by law (Article 300A). Because it is intangible, the law replaces possession with registers, though copyright needs none (Burroughs Wellcome). It replaces delivery with writing and theft with infringement remedies (Microsoft Corporation v. Yogesh Papat). It also limits the right in time, in territory (Penguin Books) and in the public interest (Entertainment Network).
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.