KSLU Solved Question Papers
Human Rights Law and Practice
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 8
2021 Oct Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Human Rights Law and Practice
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 8
2021 Oct Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2021 Oct examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2021 Oct examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2021 Oct examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 15 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: what human rights are (the idea, the statutory meaning in section 2(1)(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act 1993, and five essential features); the kinds by content: civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, with UDHR articles and examples; the kinds by holder: individual rights, collective rights of peoples and minorities, and the rights of specially protected groups (women, children, persons with disabilities); the kinds by the duty they impose (negative and positive rights); the kinds by strength (absolute and qualified rights; ICCPR Article 4(2); Articles 20 and 21 after the Forty-fourth Amendment); the kinds by time of recognition (the three generations); the kinds by legal status in India: fundamental rights, other constitutional rights (Articles 300A and 326), statutory rights and Directive Principles; the cases (Unni Krishnan, J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla); the limits of any classification; a summary table; a conclusion.
Human rights are the rights every person has simply because he or she is a human being. They do not depend on nationality, sex, religion, caste, wealth or any other status. The State does not give them; it recognises and protects them.
Indian law gives a working meaning. Section 2(1)(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act 1993 defines human rights as "the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual". They must be guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the International Covenants and be enforceable by courts in India.
Five essential features.
The Universal Declaration of 1948 and the two Covenants of 1966 group rights by what they protect. There are five kinds.
The ICCPR carries the first two kinds into binding treaty law, and the ICESCR the last three.
In National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, AIR 2014 SC 1863, transgender persons had no place in official records as male or female. They were shut out of ration cards, passports and jobs. The Supreme Court recognised a "third gender", upheld each person's right to decide his or her own gender identity, and directed reservation for them. The case shows a whole group being brought within human rights protection.
The line is not sharp. Even a "negative" right such as a fair trial needs courts, judges and legal aid, which cost money. And a "positive" right such as housing also forbids the State from destroying people's homes without a fair procedure.
In Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, AIR 1986 SC 180, pavement and slum dwellers in Bombay faced eviction and removal from the city. The Supreme Court held that the right to life under Article 21 includes the right to livelihood. No one can live without the means of living. It read the Directive Principles on work and livelihood as "equally fundamental" in understanding Article 21. Yet it also held that the State could not be compelled to provide work to everyone. The case shows a civil right carrying an economic content, and a positive claim being limited by resources.
India learnt the importance of this kind the hard way. In ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, AIR 1976 SC 1207, during the Emergency, a Presidential order suspended the right to move any court for Articles 14, 21 and 22. A majority of the Supreme Court held that no detenu could seek habeas corpus, even against an illegal detention. The Forty-fourth Amendment of 1978 then provided that Articles 20 and 21 can never be suspended. In 2017 the nine-Judge Bench in Puttaswamy expressly overruled ADM Jabalpur.
Writers also group rights by the period in which they were recognised.
The scheme helps to show how the list of rights has grown. But it must not suggest that later rights are less important.
These kinds are not fixed. In Unni Krishnan, J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1993 AIR 2178, private colleges challenged limits on the fees they could charge. The Supreme Court held that citizens have a fundamental right to education flowing from Article 21. Every child has a right to free education until the age of fourteen. A social goal in the Directive Principles thus became a fundamental right. Parliament later wrote it into the Constitution as Article 21A.
| Basis | Kinds | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Content | Civil, political, economic, social, cultural | Fair trial; vote; fair wages; housing; cultural life |
| Holder | Individual, collective, special groups | Liberty; self-determination; rights of the child |
| Duty imposed | Negative, positive | Free speech; health care |
| Strength | Absolute, qualified | Freedom from torture; free movement |
| Time of recognition | First, second, third generation | Vote; work; development |
| Legal status in India | Fundamental, other constitutional, statutory, directive | Article 21; Article 300A; RTI Act; Article 41 |
Conclusion. Human rights are the inherent and universal rights of every person, which Indian law ties to life, liberty, equality and dignity. They can be grouped by content into civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. By holder they are individual, collective and group-specific. They may be negative or positive, absolute or qualified, and of the first, second or third generation, and in India they differ in legal status. The categories are tools, not walls. Olga Tellis and Unni Krishnan show rights moving between kinds. ADM Jabalpur shows why some rights must be beyond suspension, and NALSA shows protection reaching new groups.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.