KSLU Solved Question Papers
Criminal Law II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 7
2023 Sep Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Criminal Law II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 7
2023 Sep Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2023 Sep examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2023 Sep examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2023 Sep examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 80 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: why the Code needs processes to compel appearance; the graded scheme of Chapter VI; summons: form and modes of service (sections 61 to 69); warrant of arrest: form, endorsement for bail, execution (sections 70 to 81); proclamation and attachment against absconders (sections 82 to 86); other rules: warrant instead of summons, bond for appearance, arrest on breach (sections 87 to 89); the leading cases; the matching sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; a conclusion.
A criminal case cannot go on unless the accused, and often witnesses, are before the court. Chapter VI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (sections 61 to 90) gives the court four processes, from the mildest to the most severe:
The court should choose the least harsh process that will secure attendance.
Facts. In Inder Mohan Goswami v. State of Uttaranchal, (2007) 12 SCC 1, decided on 9 October 2007, a Magistrate issued non-bailable warrants against office-bearers of a society in what was really a property dispute.
Held. A non-bailable warrant should issue only when a summons or bailable warrant is unlikely to work. Examples are where the person will not appear, cannot be found, or may harm others. A summons or bailable warrant should be preferred, and warrants need careful scrutiny.
Why it bears. It applies the graded scheme of the Chapter.
Facts. In Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2012) 8 SCC 730, decided on 31 August 2012, an accused in a dowry death case absconded and was declared a proclaimed offender. He then sought anticipatory bail.
Held. A person who has absconded and been declared a proclaimed offender under section 82 is normally not entitled to anticipatory bail.
Why it bears. It shows the serious consequences of the proclamation process.
From 1 July 2024, sections 63 to 93 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 replace sections 61 to 90. Summons may now be served electronically (sections 63 and 64). Section 66 uses "adult member of his family", not "adult male member". Section 84(4) extends the proclaimed offender rule to offences punishable with ten years or more, life or death. Section 86 allows attachment of property outside India.
Conclusion. The Code gives a ladder of processes: summons, warrant, proclamation and attachment. The court must start with the mildest and move up only when needed. Inder Mohan Goswami insists on this restraint, and Lavesh shows the price of absconding.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.