KSLU Solved Question Papers
Family Law II (Mohammedan Law and Indian Succession Act)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 6
2025 Jan Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Family Law II (Mohammedan Law and Indian Succession Act)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 6
2025 Jan Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2025 Jan examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2025 Jan examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2025 Jan examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 80 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: marriage (nikah) as a civil contract; the essentials one by one: proposal and acceptance at one meeting, capacity (puberty and sound mind, with the guardian and the option of puberty), free consent, witnesses under Sunni law, absence of prohibition, and dower; what happens when each fails (void, irregular, voidable); no ceremony or registration needed; the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006 and Karnataka's section 3(1A); Abdul Kadir v. Salima and Chand Patel v. Bismillah Begum explained; a conclusion.
Marriage (nikah) under Muslim law is a civil contract. Its purpose is to legalise sexual relations and the procreation of children. Because it is a contract, the law states the conditions on which it is formed. If a condition fails, the result depends on which condition failed.
| Defect | Result |
|---|---|
| No proposal and acceptance at one meeting | no marriage at all |
| Absolute prohibition (consanguinity, affinity, fosterage) | void (batil) |
| Relative prohibition, or want of witnesses | irregular (fasid), curable |
| Minor married by a guardian | valid, but the option of puberty is open |
| No dower fixed | valid; proper dower is payable |
A void marriage creates no rights at all. An irregular marriage has no legal effect before consummation. After consummation the wife is entitled to dower, she must observe iddat, and the children are legitimate. Neither spouse inherits from the other.
Muslim law prescribes no religious ceremony and no writing. A nikahnama is good evidence of the marriage but is not essential to it. Registration is required by some State laws, but want of registration does not make the marriage invalid.
The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006 treats a girl under 18 and a boy under 21 as a child. Solemnising a child marriage is an offence under it. Karnataka added section 3(1A), which declares every child marriage solemnised after that amendment void from the start. A Karnataka student should state this beside the classical rule on puberty.
Abdul Kadir v. Salima (1886) ILR 8 All 149. A husband sued his wife for restitution of conjugal rights. She refused to live with him because her prompt dower was unpaid. The Allahabad Full Bench held that a Muslim marriage is a civil contract. Its pillars are declaration (ijab) and acceptance (qubul). The mention of dower is not essential to validity, and the law supplies dower where none is fixed. The case establishes the contractual nature of the marriage and its essentials.
Chand Patel v. Bismillah Begum, AIR 2008 SC 1915. A man married his wife's sister while the first marriage subsisted, with the first wife's consent. A daughter was born. The second wife claimed maintenance for herself and the child. The Supreme Court held that a marriage in breach of the rule against unlawful conjunction is irregular (fasid), not void. Under Hanafi law it subsists until it is lawfully ended. The wife and child were entitled to maintenance. The case shows how breach of a relative prohibition affects validity.
Conclusion. A valid Muslim marriage needs proposal and acceptance at one meeting, competent parties, free consent, witnesses under Sunni law, freedom from prohibition, and dower. Abdul Kadir makes clear that the marriage is a contract, and Chand Patel shows that breach of a relative bar makes it irregular, not void. In Karnataka the child marriage law must also be satisfied.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.