KSLU Solved Question Papers
Family Law II (Mohammedan Law and Indian Succession Act)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 6
2018 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Family Law II (Mohammedan Law and Indian Succession Act)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 6
2018 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2018 Dec examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2018 Dec examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2018 Dec examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: what a school (madhab) is and why schools arose, as different answers to the question "how is the law to be found?"; the first division, over who should lead after the Prophet (Sunni and Shia); the four Sunni schools, each by its method (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafii, Hanbali); the Shia schools by their line of Imams, with their sub-schools: Ithna Ashari (Akhbari and Usuli), Ismaili (Nizari Khojas and Mustali Bohras, the Bohras divided into Daudi and Sulaimani), and Zaidi; the Mutazila as a school of theology; how the schools give different answers in India (Chand Patel, Syid Murtaza Husain, Qurban Husain); how a court finds a party's school; a table; a conclusion.
A school (madhab) is a body of legal doctrine built by jurists who share a method of finding the law from its sources. All schools accept the Quran and the Prophet's practice (sunna). They differ on how much weight to give to reasoning, to local practice and to the rulings of the Imams. Those differences in method produce different rules.
After the Prophet's death in 632, Muslims divided over leadership.
1. Hanafi. Founded by Abu Hanifa of Kufa (d. 767), and developed by his disciples Abu Yusuf and Muhammad. Its method gives wide room to reason: analogy (qiyas) and juristic preference (istihsan), which departs from strict analogy for fairness. It was the official school of the Mughals. Most Indian Muslims are Hanafi, and the Hedaya and the Fatawa-e-Alamgiri are its leading texts in India.
2. Maliki. Founded by Malik ibn Anas of Medina (d. 795). Its method relies on the practice of the people of Medina and on public interest (istislah). Its liberal grounds of divorce for wives influenced the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939.
3. Shafii. Founded by al-Shafii (d. 820), who systematised the theory of the four sources (Quran, sunna, consensus and analogy) and restricted free reasoning. It has followers on India's western and southern coasts, including Kerala.
4. Hanbali. Founded by Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 855). Its method holds most closely to the texts and traditions and is most wary of analogy. It has few followers in India.
1. Ithna Ashari (the Twelvers). They follow twelve Imams, the last believed to be in hiding. They are the largest Shia group in India. They have two sub-schools:
The Sharaya-ul-Islam is treated by Indian courts as a leading authority of their law.
2. Ismaili (the Seveners). They follow the line through Ismail, the eldest son of the sixth Imam. In India they have two sub-schools:
3. Zaidi. They follow Zaid, a grandson of Husain, and stand closest to the Sunnis. They are rarely found in India.
The Mutazila were a rationalist school of theology rather than of law. Their influence on Indian law is historical.
What a sub-school is. A sub-school is a group inside a school. It shares the school's line of Imams but differs on a further point of leadership or method. The Akhbari and Usuli differ on whether a living jurist may reason from the sources. The Daudi and Sulaimani Bohras split over who should succeed as their religious head (the Dai), and each follows its own Dai today. A member of a sub-school is governed by the rules of that school unless a statute or a proved custom says otherwise.
Marriage without a guardian. Under Hanafi law an adult woman may contract her own marriage without a guardian. The Maliki, Shafii and Hanbali schools require a guardian (wali). The Shafii school also lets a father give a virgin daughter in marriage without her consent.
Witnesses. Sunni law requires two witnesses at the marriage. Ithna Ashari law requires none for marriage, but requires two witnesses for talaq, which Sunni law does not.
Temporary marriage. Only the Ithna Ashari school recognises muta, a marriage for a fixed term. The Sunni schools treat it as no marriage.
Wakf. For Hanafis, following Abu Yusuf, a declaration completes a wakf. For Shias, delivery of possession is needed.
Inheritance. Sunni law arranges heirs as sharers, residuaries and distant kindred, and prefers relations through males. Ithna Ashari law arranges blood relations in three classes by nearness: parents and children first, then grandparents and brothers and sisters, then uncles and aunts. A nearer class excludes a remoter one. It also has no separate class of distant kindred.
Custom among the Ismailis. Before 1937 the Khojas and some other Ismaili communities followed custom, close to Hindu law, in matters of succession. The Shariat Act 1937 replaced such custom with Muslim personal law in the matters it lists.
These differences mean that the first step in many cases is to identify the parties' school.
Marriage: irregular or void.
Chand Patel v. Bismillah Begum AIR 2008 SC 1915. A man married his wife's younger sister while still married to the elder. He later resisted the younger wife's maintenance claim by calling the marriage void. The Supreme Court held that under Hanafi law such a marriage, being against a temporary bar, is irregular, not void, and subsists until lawfully ended. Shia law has no irregular class, so for Shias such a marriage would be void.
Inheritance: the Shia widow and land.
Syid Murtaza Husain v. Musammat Alhan Bibi (1909) 2 Ind Cas 671 (Allahabad High Court). A Shia widow with a daughter by the deceased claimed her share in his land. The defence was that a Shia widow takes no share in land. The High Court noted earlier rulings that a childless Shia widow takes no share in her husband's land. The question of a widow with a child was unsettled. The Court followed the Sharaya-ul-Islam and held that she takes her share in both movable and immovable property.
Pre-emption: reciprocity between schools.
Qurban Husain v. Chote (1900) ILR 22 All 102. A Shia claimed pre-emption as a neighbour of a house sold by Sunnis. Shia law gives a mere neighbour no such right. The Allahabad High Court dismissed his suit, holding that pre-emption rests on reciprocity. A Shia cannot claim from Sunni law a right he would deny if the positions were reversed.
| School | Branch | Founder or line | Method or mark | In India |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanafi | Sunni | Abu Hanifa | reason, analogy, istihsan | the great majority |
| Maliki | Sunni | Malik ibn Anas | Medina practice, istislah | very few |
| Shafii | Sunni | al-Shafii | ordered four sources | west and south coasts |
| Hanbali | Sunni | Ahmad ibn Hanbal | close to the texts | very few |
| Ithna Ashari | Shia | twelve Imams | Akhbari and Usuli | Lucknow, Hyderabad and elsewhere |
| Ismaili | Shia | Ismail | Khojas (Nizari); Bohras (Mustali: Daudi, Sulaimani) | Gujarat, Mumbai |
| Zaidi | Shia | Zaid | closest to the Sunnis | rare |
Conclusion. Muslim law divides into Sunni and Shia schools. The Sunni schools, Hanafi, Maliki, Shafii and Hanbali, are distinguished by their methods. The Shia schools are distinguished by their lines of Imams. They are Ithna Ashari with its Akhbari and Usuli sub-schools, Ismaili with its Khoja and Bohra branches, and Zaidi. The school can decide a case, as Chand Patel on irregular marriages, Syid Murtaza Husain on the Shia widow and Qurban Husain on pre-emption show. Courts presume a Muslim to be a Hanafi Sunni unless another school is proved.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.