KSLU Solved Question Papers
Company Law
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 6
2015 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Company Law
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 6
2015 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2015 Dec examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2015 Dec examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2015 Dec examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: Part A, who a promoter is (Twycross v. Grant; section 2(69) of the Companies Act 2013; the professional-capacity exclusion) and his legal position (a fiduciary, neither agent nor trustee); Part B, his "powers": a promoter has no statutory powers, so explain what he may lawfully do in forming the company, his rights to remuneration and expenses, and the limits the fiduciary duty sets (Erlanger); Part C, his liabilities arranged by the stage of promotion: before incorporation (personal liability on contracts, Kelner v. Baxter), at incorporation (section 7(5) to (7)), on the prospectus (sections 34 to 36), and afterwards (account and rescission, sections 300, 339, 340, 447); a table.
The courts' description. A promoter is the person who brings a company into being. In Twycross v. Grant, (1877) 2 CPD 469, Cockburn CJ described him as "one who undertakes to form a company with reference to a given project and to set it going, and who takes the necessary steps to accomplish that purpose". Whether a person is a promoter is a question of fact, judged by what he does.
The statutory definition. Section 2(69) treats as a promoter a person who:
A person acting merely in a professional capacity, such as the advocate or chartered accountant engaged to prepare the documents, is not a promoter.
His legal position. A promoter is not the company's agent, because it does not exist while he works for it. He is not its trustee, because he holds nothing for it in the strict sense. But equity treats him as a fiduciary towards the company he is forming. That governs both what he may do and what he must answer for.
The Act gives a promoter no powers. He is not an officer and holds no office. What the question calls his powers is better understood as what he may lawfully do, and the rights he may claim, in forming the company.
1. What he may do.
2. His rights.
3. The limits on what he may do. Every step is subject to his fiduciary duty. He may sell his own property to the company, but only with full disclosure to an independent board or to the members. He may make a profit, but not a secret one.
Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate Co., (1878) 3 App Cas 1218, is the classic example. A syndicate led by Erlanger bought the lease of a phosphate island for 55,000 pounds. It formed a company, named its own nominees as directors, and sold the lease to the company for 110,000 pounds. It did not tell the members of its profit. The House of Lords held that promoters stand in a fiduciary position and must disclose such an interest to an independent board or the members. The company was entitled to rescind.
Stage 1: before incorporation.
A promoter who contracts for the company before it exists is personally liable on the contract, because the company cannot ratify it. In Kelner v. Baxter, (1866) LR 2 CP 174, promoters agreed to buy wine "on behalf of" a hotel company not yet registered. The company used the wine and failed before paying, and the promoters were held personally liable. In India, the company may take over such a contract under sections 15(h) and 19(e) of the Specific Relief Act 1963. It must accept the contract after incorporation and tell the other party.
Stage 2: at incorporation.
Stage 3: on the prospectus.
Stage 4: after incorporation.
A promoter buys a factory site for ten lakh rupees, forms a company, and sells the site to it for fifteen lakh rupees. The first directors are his relatives, and the prospectus does not mention his profit. Investors subscribe on the strength of the prospectus. The company may rescind the sale or recover the five lakh rupees as a secret profit. Investors who lost money may claim compensation from him under section 35. If the concealment was meant to deceive, his liability is unlimited, and he may be prosecuted under sections 34 and 447.
| Stage | Liability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Before incorporation | Personal liability on contracts | Kelner v. Baxter |
| At incorporation | False filings; incorporation by fraud | Section 7(5) to (7), 447 |
| Prospectus | Compensation; unlimited for fraud; punishment | Sections 34 to 36 |
| After incorporation | Account, rescission, misfeasance, examination | Erlanger; sections 300, 339, 340 |
Conclusion. A promoter is the person who forms the company, described in Twycross v. Grant and defined in section 2(69). He has no statutory powers. He may take the steps needed to form the company, and claim pay only if the company agrees (Eley). He acts always as a fiduciary who must disclose his interest and make no secret profit (Erlanger). His liabilities follow each stage of promotion. He is personally bound on pre-incorporation contracts (Kelner v. Baxter) and liable for false incorporation papers and a misleading prospectus. After incorporation he must account for secret profits and answer for fraud and misfeasance.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.