munotes®

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) Sem 5 Labour Law I 2014 Jun Question Paper with Solutions

KSLU Solved Question Papers

Labour Law I

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 5

2014 Jun Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2014 Jun examination.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii
munotes.in iv

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2014 Jun examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 100  ·  20 questions answered

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in v

Q1

Unit I

munotes.in 1

(a)Discuss the importance of industrial disputes legislation and a brief note on its history of Industrial disputes legislations in India.[15]

Answer

For full marks, cover: why industrial disputes need a law of their own (the limits of the ordinary law of contract; the cost of stoppages to the public); the importance of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947, point by point: prevention (Works Committees, grievance committees), settlement machinery (conciliation, courts of inquiry, arbitration, adjudication; Bharat Bank; C.P. Sarathy), binding results, control of strikes and lock-outs, security of employment (sections 2A, 11A, 33; Chapters VA and VB), unfair labour practices (Chapter VC), and its wide reach (Bangalore Water Supply); the history: early law, the Trade Disputes Act 1929 and its main defect, Rule 81A of the Defence of India Rules in the war, the Bill of 1946 and the Act of 1947, and the main amendments of 1953, 1956, 1965, 1971, 1976, 1982 and 2010; a time line; the Industrial Relations Code 2020; a conclusion.

munotes.in 2

Why a special law is needed

Employers and workers often disagree about wages, bonus, hours, dismissals and retrenchment. The ordinary law of contract offers little help. An employer could end a contract of service on notice, and a court could not reinstate the worker. Workers who stopped work broke their contracts. No court could fix new wages for the future.

When such a quarrel ends in a strike or lock-out, everyone loses. Workers lose wages, the employer loses output, and the public loses goods and services. So the State stepped in with a law to prevent disputes, settle them peacefully, and control strikes and lock-outs.

Importance of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947

1. Prevention at the workplace. A Works Committee of employers' and workers' representatives may be set up in establishments of one hundred or more workmen (section 3). It tries to remove causes of friction early. Since 2010, an establishment of twenty or more workmen must have a Grievance Redressal Committee (section 9C).

2. Machinery to settle disputes. The Act provides a ladder of bodies.

munotes.in 3
  1. Conciliation officers and Boards of Conciliation try to bring the parties to agreement (sections 4, 5, 12 and 13).
  2. Courts of Inquiry investigate matters connected with a dispute (section 6).
  3. The parties may agree to refer their dispute to an arbitrator (section 10A).
  4. The Government may refer a dispute for compulsory adjudication (section 10). It goes to a Labour Court, an Industrial Tribunal or a National Tribunal (sections 7, 7A and 7B).

State of Madras v. C.P. Sarathy, AIR 1953 SC 53. Employees of cinema houses in Madras City raised demands, and the Government referred the dispute to a Tribunal. The managing director of one cinema was prosecuted for not obeying the award. The Supreme Court upheld the reference. A reference may be made where a dispute exists or is only apprehended. In making it, the Government performs an administrative act.

munotes.in 4

Bharat Bank Ltd. v. Employees of Bharat Bank Ltd., AIR 1950 SC 188. A bank appealed against an award of the All India Industrial Tribunal. The Supreme Court held, by majority, that an Industrial Tribunal performs functions very like those of a court, though it is not a court. So its award can come before the Supreme Court by special leave under Article 136.

3. Binding results. A settlement in conciliation binds all workmen of the establishment, present and future (section 18(3)). So does an award. Money due may be recovered as arrears of land revenue (section 33C), and breach is punishable (section 29).

4. Control of strikes and lock-outs. In public utility services, notice is required before a strike or lock-out (section 22). In every establishment, neither may begin while proceedings are pending or an award is in force (section 23). Those begun in breach are illegal (section 24).

5. Security of employment.

  1. A dismissed individual workman may raise an industrial dispute without his union (section 2A).
  2. The adjudicator may set aside a dismissal and order reinstatement, or reduce the punishment (section 11A).
munotes.in 5
  1. While proceedings are pending, the employer may not change service conditions or punish workmen concerned without permission (section 33).
  2. Laid-off and retrenched workmen receive compensation (Chapter VA). In large establishments, lay-off, retrenchment and closure need the Government's prior permission (Chapter VB).

6. Fair dealing. Unfair labour practices by employers, workmen and unions are prohibited and punishable (Chapter VC, Fifth Schedule).

7. A wide reach.

Bangalore Water-Supply and Sewerage Board v. R. Rajappa, AIR 1978 SC 548. A statutory board supplying water claimed it was not an "industry", so that the Act did not apply. A seven-Judge Bench held the Board an industry under its triple test. Systematic activity, organised by co-operation between employer and employee, producing goods or services, is prima facie an industry. Profit motive is irrelevant. So the Act's protection reaches very many workplaces.

munotes.in 6

History of industrial disputes legislation in India

1. Early law. Accounts of the subject usually begin with the Employers and Workmen (Disputes) Act 1860. The Trade Unions Act 1926 then allowed unions to register, and gave registered unions immunities.

2. The Trade Disputes Act 1929. It provided Courts of Inquiry and Boards of Conciliation to investigate and settle disputes. It also restricted strikes and lock-outs in public utility services. Its main defect, the Government later said, was this. It restrained strikes and lock-outs in public utility services, yet did not make its settlement machinery conclusive and binding on the parties.

3. Rule 81A of the Defence of India Rules. During the Second World War, Rule 81A cured that defect. The Central Government could refer disputes to adjudication and enforce the awards. The Rule was due to lapse on 1 October 1946. The Emergency Powers (Continuance) Ordinance 1946 kept it in force for six more months.

munotes.in 7

4. The Industrial Disputes Act 1947. The Bill of 1946 embodied the essential principles of Rule 81A, and kept most of the 1929 Act. It added two new bodies: Works Committees and Industrial Tribunals. Conciliation became compulsory in public utility services and optional elsewhere. A settlement reached in conciliation became binding, and strikes and lock-outs were barred during proceedings. The Act received assent on 11 March 1947. It came into force on 1 April 1947.

5. The main amendments.

  1. 1953 (Act 43 of 1953). Chapter VA gave compensation for lay-off and retrenchment, from 24 October 1953.
  2. 1956 (Act 36 of 1956). It created the three tiers of Labour Courts, Industrial Tribunals and National Tribunals, from 10 March 1957.
  3. 1965 (Act 35 of 1965). Section 2A made an individual dismissal an industrial dispute, from 1 December 1965.
  4. 1971 (Act 45 of 1971). Section 11A let adjudicators review punishments, from 15 December 1971.
  5. 1976 (Act 32 of 1976). Chapter VB required permission for lay-off, retrenchment and closure in large establishments, from 5 March 1976.
munotes.in 8
  1. 1982 (Act 46 of 1982). Chapter VC on unfair labour practices and section 17B came into force on 21 August 1984.
  2. 2010 (Act 24 of 2010). From 15 September 2010, it added grievance committees and let a dismissed workman apply directly to the Labour Court.

The time line

YearLawMain step
1929Trade Disputes ActCourts of Inquiry, Boards of Conciliation
wartime to 1947Rule 81Acompulsory adjudication, enforceable awards
1947Industrial Disputes ActWorks Committees, Tribunals, binding settlements
1956Act 36 of 1956Labour Courts, Tribunals, National Tribunals
1965, 1971sections 2A, 11Aindividual disputes; review of punishment
1976, 1982Chapters VB, VCpermission rules; unfair labour practices
munotes.in 9
YearLawMain step
2010Act 24 of 2010grievance committees; direct access
2025Industrial Relations Codeone Code for disputes

Where the law stands now

The Industrial Relations Code 2020 came into force on 21 November 2025. Section 104 repealed the Trade Unions Act, the Standing Orders Act and the Industrial Disputes Act. The Code keeps the same scheme. It has grievance committees (section 4), conciliation (section 43) and strike rules (section 62). Disputes go to Industrial Tribunals and a National Industrial Tribunal (sections 44 and 46). It drops the separate Labour Court.

Conclusion. Industrial disputes legislation matters because ordinary contract law cannot keep industrial peace or protect workers' jobs. The 1947 Act prevents disputes, settles them through conciliation and adjudication, and makes the results binding. It controls strikes and lock-outs, and protects workers' employment. Bharat Bank, C.P. Sarathy and Bangalore Water Supply show its machinery and reach. It grew from the 1929 Act and wartime Rule 81A, and was strengthened by amendments from 1953 to 2010. The Industrial Relations Code 2020 now carries it forward.

munotes.in 10

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest come with the KSLU B.A. LL.B. Semester 5 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in

The question paper itself stays free.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!