KSLU Solved Question Papers
Jurisprudence
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 5
2013 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Jurisprudence
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 5
2013 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2013 Jun examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2013 Jun examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2013 Jun examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning of jurisprudence: the word (juris prudentia) and its use in different senses; the classical definitions (Ulpian, Austin, Holland, Salmond, Keeton, Pound, Stone) and what each stresses; a working definition; the scope of jurisprudence: Austin's general and particular jurisprudence, Salmond's analytical, historical and ethical branches, and the subjects it covers (the nature of law and the schools; sources of law; legal concepts; the administration of justice; liability), each shown with an Indian decision (Bhimashya v. Janabi, 2006, on custom as a source; State of Orissa v. Sudhansu Sekhar Misra, 1967, on precedent; Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose, 1903, on capacity and obligation; Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, 1997, on newer fields); the newer fields; why the scope keeps changing; a table; a conclusion.
Jurisprudence comes from the Latin juris prudentia: knowledge of law, or skill in law. The word is used in several senses.
It is in the third sense that jurisprudence is a subject of study.
A working definition. Jurisprudence is the study of the general nature of law, its sources, its basic concepts and its purposes. It also studies the relation of law to society and justice.
1. Austin's general and particular jurisprudence. General jurisprudence studies the principles, notions and distinctions common to mature legal systems. Particular jurisprudence studies the law of one country. Jurisprudence as an academic subject is mainly general, but it draws its examples from particular systems such as Indian law.
2. Salmond's three branches.
3. The subjects it covers.
(a) The nature of law and the schools. What law is, its functions and purposes, and the answers of the natural law, analytical, historical, sociological and realist schools.
(b) The sources of law. Legislation, precedent and custom, and how each produces law.
Custom as a source is shown in Bhimashya v. Janabi, decided by the Supreme Court on 11 December 2006. A daughter sued for a share in joint family property. The defendants relied on an adoption that the general law forbade, claiming a custom of the area and the family allowed it. The custom had never been pleaded or proved. The Supreme Court held that a person relying on a custom that varies the general law must plead it and prove it by clear evidence. The theory of custom decided the case.
Precedent as a source is shown in State of Orissa v. Sudhansu Sekhar Misra, 1968 AIR 647. The High Court had relied on broad observations in two earlier Supreme Court decisions about the control of the subordinate judiciary. The Supreme Court held that a decision is an authority only for what it actually decides, and that only its ratio binds.
(c) Legal concepts. Persons, rights and duties, possession, ownership, obligations and liability.
Capacity and obligation are shown in Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose, (1903) 30 IA 114. A minor, Dharmodas Ghose, mortgaged his property to a moneylender in 1895. The lender's attorney had been told that he was a minor. The Privy Council held a minor's agreement absolutely void. No obligation arose, the mortgage was set aside, and the lender could not recover the advance. The concepts of capacity and obligation decided the case.
(d) The administration of justice. Civil and criminal justice, the functions of courts, and the theories of punishment.
(e) Liability. Its conditions (act, mens rea, causation), its kinds (civil and criminal, strict and vicarious) and its limits.
Jurisprudence is related to, but distinct from, several other subjects. Political science studies the State and government; jurisprudence studies the law the State makes and applies. Sociology studies society in general; jurisprudence studies law as one of society's institutions. Ethics studies right conduct; jurisprudence asks how far law should follow morality. Philosophy supplies the methods of analysis that jurisprudence uses. The overlap explains why jurisprudence is sometimes called the meeting point of law and the other social sciences.
Modern jurisprudence has widened its scope further.
Indian courts have drawn on such newer thinking. In Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011, there was no law against sexual harassment at the workplace. The Supreme Court held that it violates the rights to equality and to life with dignity. It drew on an international convention on discrimination against women, and laid down binding guidelines until Parliament legislated. The case shows gender justice entering the scope of Indian jurisprudence.
Jurisprudence has no fixed boundaries, because law and society change. New problems, such as the environment, technology and the status of animals, raise new questions about rights, persons and liability. Each school also draws the boundaries differently. The scope of jurisprudence therefore grows with the law it studies.
| Aspect | Content | Indian illustration |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | Study of first principles of law | Ulpian, Austin, Holland, Salmond |
| General and particular | Common principles; one country's law | Indian law as examples |
| Analytical branch | Legal concepts | Capacity in Mohori Bibee |
| Aspect | Content | Indian illustration |
|---|---|---|
| Historical branch | Growth of law | Custom in Bhimashya |
| Ethical branch | What law ought to be | Gender justice in Vishaka |
| Sources | Legislation, precedent, custom | Precedent in Sudhansu Sekhar Misra |
| Newer fields | Economics, gender, technology, rights | Vishaka |
Conclusion. Jurisprudence means knowledge of law, and in legal study the science of its first principles. Ulpian, Austin, Holland, Salmond, Keeton, Pound and Stone each define it by a different aspect. Its scope covers general jurisprudence and Salmond's analytical, historical and ethical branches. It includes the nature of law, its sources, its concepts, the administration of justice and liability, and it now reaches into newer fields. Indian decisions show this scope at work: Bhimashya on custom, Sudhansu Sekhar Misra on precedent, Mohori Bibee on capacity, and Vishaka on gender justice. The scope of jurisprudence grows as law and society change.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.