KSLU Solved Question Papers
Political Science (State and Political Obligations)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 3
2016 Jun (100 marks) Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Political Science (State and Political Obligations)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 3
2016 Jun (100 marks) Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2016 Jun (100 marks) examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2016 Jun (100 marks) examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2016 Jun (100 marks) examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: a definition of political obligation and the four things it involves (a person bound, the State to which it is owed, a content, a ground); its kinds, classified six ways: by what binds (legal, moral, political in the strict sense), by content (obedience, allegiance, taxes, defence, participation, respect for national institutions), by the person bound (citizens, aliens and refugees, public officials, members of the armed forces, legislators), by the form of the State (monarchy, individualist, welfare and socialist States), by direction (the citizen's to the State and the State's to the citizen) and by force (absolute and prima facie, positive and negative, general and particular); a summary table; two Indian cases on the special obligations of legislators (Kihoto Hollohan, Raja Ram Pal); and a conclusion.
Political obligation is the moral duty of a member of a political community to obey the laws of the State. It also includes the duty to support its lawful institutions. It answers the question why a person should obey the State at all, and not merely what the law requires.
Every political obligation involves four things. There is a person bound, and the State to which it is owed. There is a content, what must be done or avoided, and a ground, why it binds. The kinds of political obligation are found by varying each of these.
The content of the obligation changes with the kind of State.
Political obligation runs both ways. The citizen's obligation to the State is to obey, support and defend it. The State's obligation to the citizen is to protect life, liberty and property, to do justice and to secure the conditions of a decent life. Each side's duty is strongest when the other side keeps its own.
Take an Indian citizen who is also a member of a State legislature.
The example shows that the kinds are not separate boxes. One person carries several kinds of obligation at once, and their weight depends on her position.
Sorting political obligation into kinds has a practical use. It shows who owes what, so the State cannot demand from a foreign visitor the loyalty it may demand from a soldier. It shows that obligation runs both ways, so a State that abandons its own duties weakens its claim. And it shows that most obligation is prima facie, which leaves room for conscience and for lawful dissent.
| Basis | Kinds |
|---|---|
| What binds | Legal, moral, political in the strict sense |
| Content | Obedience, allegiance, taxes, defence, participation, respect for institutions |
| Person bound | Citizens, aliens and refugees, officials, armed forces, legislators |
| Form of State | Monarchy, individualist, welfare and socialist |
| Direction | Citizen to State; State to citizen |
| Force | Absolute or prima facie; positive or negative; general and particular |
Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu, 1992 Supp (2) SCC 651. The Tenth Schedule, inserted in 1985, disqualifies a legislator who leaves the party that set him up, or votes against its direction. It was challenged as violating the member's freedom of speech, vote and conscience. The Supreme Court upheld it in substance. A member elected on a party's platform is not entitled to defeat the mandate on which he was returned. But it read "any direction" narrowly, to votes critical to the government or integral to the party's policy. The case shows a special political obligation owed by a legislator, within limits.
Raja Ram Pal v. Hon'ble Speaker, Lok Sabha, (2007) 3 SCC 184. In December 2005 a television channel broadcast recordings of members of Parliament accepting money for asking questions. After inquiries, eleven members were expelled. The Supreme Court upheld the power of each House to expel a member under article 105(3). It held that the constituency's rights were not violated, since an expelled member may stand again. The case shows that a legislator's obligation includes honesty in the House itself, and that breach can cost him his seat.
Conclusion. Political obligation is the moral duty to obey the State and support its lawful institutions. Its kinds may be classified by what binds, by content, by the person bound, by the form of the State, by direction and by force. Citizens, aliens, officials, soldiers and legislators owe it in different degrees, and the State owes protection in return. Kihoto Hollohan and Raja Ram Pal show the special obligations of those who make the laws.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.