KSLU Solved Question Papers
Land Law
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 10
2023 Mar (100 marks) Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Land Law
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 10
2023 Mar (100 marks) Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2023 Mar (100 marks) examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2023 Mar (100 marks) examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2023 Mar (100 marks) examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the scheme of the 2013 Act and how it differs from the 1894 Act; the stages before notification (social impact study, consent, food security, and Karnataka's section 10-A exemption); the preliminary notification, its contents and effects (section 11); survey, damage and objections (sections 12 to 15); the rehabilitation scheme (sections 16 to 18); the declaration and its time limit (section 19); marking out, notice, statements, inquiry and award (sections 20 to 25, with Karnataka's section 23-A); compensation and the rehabilitation award (sections 26 to 31); finality and possession (sections 37 and 38); urgency (section 40); Karnataka's voluntary acquisition (section 30-A); references and lapse; cases; conclusion.
Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, acquisition began with a notification under section 4 and objections under section 5-A of that Act. A declaration under section 6 and an award under section 11 followed. Displaced people had little say, and rehabilitation was not part of the process. The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 keeps the notification, declaration and award. It adds a study before notification, a rehabilitation scheme beside the award, strict time limits, and payment before possession.
The Administrator surveys and takes a census of affected families, their land, livelihoods and common property. He prepares a draft scheme with time limits, discussed in the Gram Sabhas and at public hearings. The Collector reviews it with the project committee, and the Commissioner approves it. It is then published in the local language and online.
A person interested who has not accepted the award may seek a reference to the Authority under section 64. An appeal then lies to the High Court under section 74. Acquisitions begun under the 1894 Act are governed by section 24.
Radhy Shyam v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2011) 5 SCC 553. The Supreme Court quashed an acquisition at Greater Noida because urgency had been used to deny the hearing of objections. It called that hearing the statutory form of the right to be heard. Section 15 continues that right.
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Vishnu Prasad Sharma, AIR 1966 SC 1593. Under the 1894 Act, only one declaration could follow one notification. Section 19(1) of the 2013 Act now expressly allows several declarations for different parcels.
Kedar Nath Yadav v. State of West Bengal, decided on 31 August 2016. At Singur, the objections were not properly considered and composite awards were made after a joint inquiry. Gopala Gowda J held that the award inquiry is quasi-judicial and that a composite award "is no award in the eyes of law". The acquisition was quashed.
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal, (2020) 8 SCC 129. A Constitution Bench held that an old acquisition lapses under section 24(2) only if neither possession was taken nor compensation paid.
Conclusion. Acquisition under the 2013 Act moves through fixed stages: social impact study, preliminary notification, survey, objections and a rehabilitation scheme. A declaration follows within twelve months, then an award within twelve months, and payment before possession. Each stage is published, heard and timed, and missing a deadline ends the acquisition. Karnataka has added exemptions for notified projects, awards by agreement and voluntary purchase.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.