munotes®

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) Sem 5 Family Law I Oct 2025 Question Paper with Solutions

SPPU Solved Question Papers

Family Law I

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 5

Oct 2025 Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 6 November 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Savitribai Phule Pune University. It is not affiliated with Savitribai Phule Pune University, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Savitribai Phule Pune University at the Oct 2025 examination.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii

MarksPage

munotes.in iv

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the Oct 2025 examination, reproduced as Savitribai Phule Pune University set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 70  ·  14 questions answered

Instructions printed on the paper

  • N.B. (1) Answer any two questions from Part A. Each question in Part A is for 15 Marks. (2) Answer any three questions from Part B. Each question in Part B is for 10 Marks. (3) Answer question No. 10 from Part C as directed. Question No.10 is for 10 Marks. (4) Figures to the right indicate full Marks.

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in v

SECTION I

PART A

Answer any two · 30 Marks

munotes.in 1

Q1)Critically evaluate the modes of dissolution of marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.[15]

Answer

For full marks, cover: what dissolution means and how it differs from annulment and judicial separation; divorce on fault grounds (section 13(1)); the wife's special grounds (section 13(2)); breakdown after a decree (section 13(1A)); divorce by mutual consent (section 13B, Amardeep Singh); irretrievable breakdown (Shilpa Sailesh); the limits in sections 13A, 14, 15 and 23; and a critical evaluation.

Introduction

Under classical Hindu law marriage was a sacrament: permanent and indissoluble. The Hindu Marriage Act 1955 changed this. A Hindu marriage can now be dissolved by a decree of divorce.

Three remedies must be kept apart:

  1. Annulment under sections 11 and 12 says the marriage was void or voidable from the start.
  2. Judicial separation under section 10 lets the spouses live apart, but the marriage continues.
  3. Divorce under sections 13 and 13B ends a valid marriage. This is dissolution in the strict sense.
munotes.in 2

A marriage also ends on the death of either spouse. The Act deals with dissolution by the court.

Mode 1: Divorce on fault grounds, section 13(1)

Either spouse may petition on any of these grounds:

  1. Adultery: the respondent has had voluntary sexual intercourse with a person other than the spouse. A single act is enough.
  2. Cruelty: the respondent has treated the petitioner with cruelty, physical or mental. In Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh, decided on 26 March 2007, the Supreme Court gave fourteen illustrative instances of mental cruelty and refused to define it exhaustively.
  3. Desertion for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately before the petition.
  4. Conversion: the respondent has ceased to be a Hindu by conversion to another religion.
  5. Mental disorder: the respondent is incurably of unsound mind. Or the respondent suffers from mental disorder of such a kind that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with him or her.
  6. Leprosy, clause (iv), was omitted with effect from 1 March 2019. It is no longer a ground.
  7. Venereal disease in a communicable form.
munotes.in 3
  1. Renunciation: the respondent has renounced the world by entering a religious order.
  2. Presumed death: the respondent has not been heard of as alive for seven years by those who would naturally have heard.

These are fault grounds. The petitioner must prove that the other spouse did something wrong, or suffers from a condition the law recognises.

Two grounds explained.

  1. Desertion means the intentional and permanent abandonment of one spouse by the other, without consent and without reasonable cause. Four things must be shown: the fact of separation, the intention to end cohabitation, the absence of consent, and the absence of reasonable cause. The Explanation to section 13(1) includes wilful neglect. So a spouse who drives the other out of the home by misconduct may be guilty of desertion, though it was the other who left. This is called constructive desertion.
munotes.in 4
  1. Cruelty is conduct of such a kind that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent. It need not be physical. Persistent abuse, false accusations, and refusal of marital relations without reason may all amount to mental cruelty, as Samar Ghosh shows.

Mode 2: The wife's additional grounds, section 13(2)

A wife may also seek divorce on four more grounds:

  1. The husband had another wife living, married before the Act.
  2. The husband has been guilty of rape, sodomy or bestiality.
  3. A decree or order of maintenance was passed against the husband, and there has been no cohabitation for one year after it.
  4. Option of puberty: she was married before fifteen and repudiated the marriage after fifteen but before eighteen.

Mode 3: Breakdown after a decree, section 13(1A)

Either party may seek divorce where:

  1. there has been no resumption of cohabitation for one year or more after a decree of judicial separation; or
munotes.in 5
  1. there has been no restitution of conjugal rights for one year or more after a decree under section 9.

This is a limited breakdown ground. Even the party against whom the earlier decree was passed may use it.

Mode 4: Divorce by mutual consent, section 13B

  1. First motion, section 13B(1). Both spouses present a joint petition. They must show three things. They have been living separately for one year or more. They have not been able to live together. And they have mutually agreed to dissolve the marriage.
  2. Second motion, section 13B(2). Both parties move the court again not earlier than six months and not later than eighteen months after the first petition. The court must be satisfied that consent still exists.

In Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, (2017) 8 SCC 746, the Supreme Court held that the six-month period is directory, not mandatory. The family court may waive it where mediation has failed and maintenance and custody are settled.

munotes.in 6

Mode 5: Irretrievable breakdown, by the Supreme Court

Irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a ground in the Act. But in Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan, decided on 1 May 2023, a Constitution Bench held that the Supreme Court may dissolve a marriage on this ground under Article 142. It may do so to do complete justice, even if one party objects. Family courts and High Courts do not have this power.

The limits

  1. Section 13A: in a petition for divorce, the court may grant judicial separation instead. This does not apply where the ground is conversion, renunciation or presumed death.
  2. Section 14: no petition for divorce may be presented within one year of the marriage. The court may allow it earlier only for exceptional hardship to the petitioner or exceptional depravity of the respondent.
munotes.in 7
  1. Section 15: a divorced person may remarry only when the decree is final. That is when there is no right of appeal, the time for appeal has expired, or an appeal has been dismissed.
  2. Section 23: the court grants relief only if the petitioner is not taking advantage of his or her own wrong. There must be no collusion and no unnecessary delay. And the court must first try to bring about reconciliation.

The modes at a glance

ModeSectionBasisWho may use it
Fault divorce13(1)The other spouse's fault or conditionEither spouse
Wife's grounds13(2)Special groundsThe wife only
After a decree13(1A)No cohabitation or restitution for one yearEither spouse
Mutual consent13BAgreement and one year's separationBoth together
Irretrievable breakdownArticle 142Marriage dead in factThe Supreme Court only
munotes.in 8

Critical evaluation

Strengths.

  1. The Act moved Hindu law from an indissoluble sacrament to a marriage that can be ended when it fails.
  2. Mutual consent, and the waiver allowed by Amardeep Singh, let couples part with dignity and without blame.
  3. The grounds are equal for husband and wife, and the wife has extra protection under section 13(2).
  4. Obsolete and stigmatising grounds, like leprosy, have been removed.

Weaknesses.

  1. The fault theory still dominates. A spouse must usually prove the other's wrongdoing. This makes cases bitter and long.
  2. No general breakdown ground. Where one spouse refuses consent, a dead marriage may continue for years. Only the Supreme Court can grant relief under Article 142. The Law Commission has recommended irretrievable breakdown as a ground, but Parliament has not added it.
munotes.in 9
  1. Delay. Divorce cases take years in practice, which defeats the purpose of quick relief.
  2. Economic protection on divorce depends on separate maintenance laws, and there is no rule for sharing property acquired during marriage.

Conclusion. The Hindu Marriage Act allows dissolution by divorce on fault grounds (section 13(1)) and on the wife's special grounds (section 13(2)). It also allows divorce after a decree not followed by cohabitation (section 13(1A)), and by mutual consent (section 13B). The Supreme Court may also dissolve a marriage that has irretrievably broken down under Article 142 (Shilpa Sailesh). The law has moved far from the idea of an indissoluble sacrament. But it still rests largely on fault, and a general breakdown ground remains the main reform that is needed.

munotes.in 10

The rest of the answers

The rest of the answers come with the SPPU B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) Semester 5 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in

The question paper itself stays open to everyone.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!