Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLB 3 years · Sem 6
Nov 2011 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LLB 3 years · Sem 6
Nov 2011 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 24 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the Nov 2011 examination.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the Nov 2011 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the Nov 2011 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 25 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Q.1: Answer in not more than two sentences
20 Marks - 2 marks each
Answer
Definition. Under section 9 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, a "holder in due course" is a person who meets four conditions.
Stricter than English law. Indian law asks not only for honesty but for due care. In U. Ponnappa Moothan Sons v. Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd., (1991) 1 SCC 113, a bank bought two order cheques from the payee firm and credited it. When the cheques bounced, the Supreme Court held the bank a holder in due course. It had paid value before the cheques were due, the cheques bore no "not negotiable" crossing, and nothing gave it cause to suspect the firm's title.
Why it matters. Every prior party is liable to a holder in due course until the instrument is satisfied (section 36). He also takes free from defects in earlier dealings. Even if the instrument was lost, or obtained by fraud or for an unlawful consideration, he can recover the amount (section 58). Anyone who takes from him gets his rights (section 53). Every holder is presumed to be a holder in due course until the contrary is proved (section 118(g)).
Conclusion. A holder in due course took the instrument for value and before maturity. He also had no cause to suspect a defect in his transferor's title.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.