munotes®

LLB 3 years Sem 1 Torts May 2022 - Law Of Torts Question Paper with Solutions

Mumbai University Solved Question Papers

Torts

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

LLB 3 years · Sem 1

May 2022 - Law Of Torts Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 18 September 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the May 2022 - Law Of Torts examination.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii
munotes.in iv
munotes.in v
munotes.in vi

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the May 2022 - Law Of Torts examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

30 questions answered

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in vii

SECTION I

Multiple choice questions

20 questions

munotes.in 1

1.The main supporter of the theory that "it is a law of Tort" and "not law of Torts" is. (a) Winfield (b) Salmond (c) Fleming (d) Heuston

Answer

The answer is (a) Winfield.

Winfield held that there is a law of tort, that is a general principle of liability: all harm is prima facie tortious unless there is some justification for it, and the courts remain free to recognise new heads of liability as new kinds of harm appear. His definition carries the theory: "Tortious liability arises from the breach of a duty primarily fixed by law; this duty is towards persons generally and its breach is redressible by an action for unliquidated damages."

Why the others are wrong:

  • (b) Salmond held the opposite view, that there is only a law of torts. On his pigeon-hole theory the law knows a finite list of nominate torts, and a plaintiff whose harm fits no pigeon-hole has no remedy.
  • (c) Fleming and (d) Heuston are writers on the subject, and Heuston in fact edited Salmond and defended the pigeon-hole view. Neither is the originator of the general-principle theory.
munotes.in 2

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest are part of LL.B. 3 Years Semester 1.

You have read the paper as it was set and the first model answer in full. The remaining answers come with the bundle, along with every other solved paper for this semester.

See the semester for ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in

Or just the solved papers: ₹499

The question paper itself stays free, as does the syllabus and module one of every subject.

Report or request

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!