Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Family Law II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 7
Feb 2023 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Family Law II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 7
Feb 2023 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 29 September 2026.
This edition revised 6 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the Feb 2023 examination.
The answers in this volume state the law as it stands today, not as it stood when the paper was set, and in this subject three amendments and two new codes do the work. The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 made a daughter a coparcener by birth, abolished survivorship and the pious obligation for later debts, and omitted Sections 23 and 24, so a remarried widow is no longer disqualified from inheriting; the Personal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2010 rewrote Section 8 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act so that a married woman may adopt with her husband's consent, where before she could not adopt at all, and gave the father and mother an equal right to give a child in adoption; and the Personal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2019 removed leprosy as a ground of divorce and as a ground of separate maintenance. The older papers here were set before some of those changes and are answered on the law as amended, with the date of the change given. Where a question turns on the criminal law, the answers give the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and name the section of the Indian Penal Code or the Criminal Procedure Code that each replaced, and they record that adultery ceased to be an offence in Joseph Shine in 2018 while remaining a ground of divorce.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the Feb 2023 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the Feb 2023 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 2 hours · Total marks 60 · 22 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
1. Answer any SIX of the following in not more than two sentences, any 6 of 10 12 Marks
Answer
Section 2(1)(b) of the Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987 defines glorification of sati. Any two of the four heads answer the question.
First, a ceremony or a procession. The observance of any ceremony, or the taking out of a procession, in connection with the commission of sati.
Second, supporting or propagating the practice. Supporting, justifying or propagating the practice of sati in any manner, which covers a speech, a pamphlet or a post.
The other two heads. The arranging of any function to eulogise the person who has committed sati; and the creation of a trust, the collection of funds, the construction of a temple or other structure, or the carrying on of any form of worship there, with a view to perpetuating the honour or preserving the memory of a person who has committed sati.
The punishment, section 5. Glorification is punishable with imprisonment of not less than one year and up to seven years, and fine of not less than five thousand and up to thirty thousand rupees. Sections 6 and 7 let the Collector or District Magistrate prohibit such ceremonies and seize the funds or the temple property. Under section 9 the offences are tried by Special Courts, and they are cognizable, non-bailable and non-compoundable.
What the section has achieved. After the death of Roop Kanwar at Deorala in 1987, a glorification prosecution was brought over a procession held on the first anniversary. Twenty-five of the accused were acquitted in 2004 and the last eight in October 2024, so the case closed after thirty-seven years with no conviction. The difficulty is evidentiary, not legal: glorification has to be proved against named individuals in a crowd.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499
The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.