Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Sociology
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 3
2019-20 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Sociology
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 3
2019-20 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 10 August 2026.
This edition revised 11 August 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2019-20 examination.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2019-20 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2019-20 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 25 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Q. 1: Answer in brief
20 Marks
Answer
Sociology is the scientific study of society, of social relationships, social institutions and social behaviour. The word was coined by Auguste Comte in 1838, from the Latin socius, companion, and the Greek logos, study.
Definitions. Comte: the science of social phenomena subject to natural and invariable laws. Durkheim: the science of social institutions, and elsewhere of social facts. Max Weber: a science which attempts the interpretative understanding of social action in order thereby to arrive at a causal explanation of its course and effects. MacIver and Page: sociology is about social relationships, the network of which is called society.
Answer
Ethnocentrism is the tendency to judge other cultures by the standards of one's own and to regard one's own group as the centre of everything and as naturally superior. The term is William Graham Sumner's, from Folkways (1906).
It follows directly from his distinction between the in group, the "we" group, marked by loyalty and cooperation, and the out group, the "they" group, viewed with indifference, contempt or hostility.
Its opposite principle is cultural relativism, the requirement that a cultural trait be understood in its own context rather than judged by an outside standard.
Answer
A feud is a prolonged, hostile relationship between two families, kin groups, clans or communities, usually arising from an injury such as a killing, an insult or a dispute over land or honour, in which each side considers itself bound to retaliate and each retaliation supplies the reason for the next.
Its distinguishing features are that the parties are groups rather than individuals; that the whole group is treated as collectively liable for what any member does; that it is hereditary, passing to the next generation; and that it is self perpetuating, since every act of revenge is also a fresh injury.
It is a form of conflict, and specifically of corporate conflict in Gillin and Gillin's classification, conducted by members of a group against another group as groups.
Answer
Amitate is a kinship usage in which the father's sister, the amita in Latin, is given special respect, authority and importance, and is treated as more significant than the mother in certain matters affecting her brother's children.
She may have a decisive voice in their marriage, receive special gifts, be consulted at rituals and be entitled to particular deference. The usage is found among the Toda and in parts of south India.
Its counterpart is the avunculate, in which the mother's brother, the avunculus, holds a special position of authority and obligation towards his sister's children. The avunculate is characteristic of matrilineal societies, as among the Nair, Khasi and Garo, where descent and property pass through the mother's line.
Answer
Both terms are William Graham Sumner's, from Folkways (1906).
Folkways are the recognised, habitual ways of behaving in a society, the customary practices of everyday life, followed without reflection: modes of dress, forms of greeting, table manners, the hours of meals. Their violation brings only mild disapproval, and the offender is thought odd or ill mannered, not wicked.
Mores are those folkways a group regards as essential to its welfare, and which therefore carry strong moral feeling: honesty, monogamy, the prohibition of incest, the duty to care for one's children. Their violation brings severe disapproval and often punishment, and the offender is thought immoral.
Taboos are negative mores, absolute prohibitions on doing something.
Answer
Democracy, from the Greek demos, people, and kratos, rule, is a system of government in which supreme power rests with the people, exercised directly or through representatives chosen in free and periodic elections.
Abraham Lincoln's formulation is the standard one: "government of the people, by the people, for the people."
Its types are direct democracy, in which citizens decide themselves, as in the Greek city states and in the modern referendum, and indirect or representative democracy, in which they choose representatives.
Its essential conditions are universal adult franchise; free, fair and periodic elections; more than one party and a legitimate opposition; rule of law and an independent judiciary; fundamental rights, especially of speech, assembly and association; a free press; and the accountability of the executive.
Answer
Status is the position a person occupies in a social system, carrying rights, duties and a place in the scale of prestige.
Ascribed status is assigned at birth or acquired involuntarily, without regard to ability or effort, and generally cannot be changed: sex, age, caste, race, kinship position, hereditary title.
Achieved status is earned through effort, ability, choice or competition: advocate, graduate, husband, trade union leader, convicted offender.
The distinction is Ralph Linton's. Traditional societies rest mainly on ascription, modern industrial societies mainly on achievement, though no society uses one alone.
Answer
A single parent family is a household in which one parent alone is responsible for the care and upbringing of one or more dependent children.
It arises through death of a spouse, historically the commonest route in India, producing the very large number of widow headed households; divorce or separation; desertion; unmarried parenthood; single person adoption, permitted under the Juvenile Justice Act and the CARA regulations; and migration, where one parent works elsewhere.
It is overwhelmingly headed by women, and the difficulties it produces, a single income, the double burden of earning and caring, stigma, difficulty in renting accommodation and legal obstacles over maintenance and guardianship, fall very unequally on the two sexes.
Answer
Group marriage is the form of marriage in which several men are married collectively to several women, so that every man is the husband of every woman and every woman the wife of every man in the group.
It is the rarest of the forms of marriage and the most disputed. It has been reported among the Toda of the Nilgiris and among the Marquesan islanders, but the ethnographic evidence is thin and most sociologists doubt that it has existed anywhere as a regular, stable institution rather than as an occasional arrangement or a stage in the transition between polyandry and polygyny.
It is classified as a form of polygamy, alongside polygyny, one man with several wives, and polyandry, one woman with several husbands.
Answer
Scheduled Tribes, about 8.6 per cent of the population and specified under Article 342, face problems distinct in kind from those of Scheduled Castes: their disadvantage is territorial rather than ritual. The principal problems are:
Q. 2: Short Notes, any 4
20 Marks
Answer
For full marks, cover: status and role and their relation, the concepts of status set and role set, role conflict with its types and examples, role strain, the mechanisms societies use to manage both, and the significance.
Status and role. Status is the position a person occupies in a social system, carrying rights, duties and prestige. Role is the behaviour expected of the person occupying that status. Linton: "A role is the dynamic aspect of a status. When the individual puts the rights and duties which constitute the status into effect, he is performing a role." Status is what a person is; role is what a person does; and neither exists without the other.
Merton's two concepts, which the topic depends on:
Role conflict. Incompatible demands arising from two or more different statuses held at the same time, so that fulfilling one means failing the other. The clash is between roles.
Examples: a woman who is both a judge and a mother, required in court on the morning her child is ill; a police officer required to arrest a relative; a working woman carrying both employment and the whole of domestic work.
Types: inter role conflict, between two statuses, which is role conflict proper; intra role conflict, between the different expectations attached to one status, which is role strain; and person role conflict, where a role requires conduct contrary to the occupant's own values, as with an official ordered to do something he believes wrong.
Role strain. Incompatible demands arising within a single role. An advocate's one role requires both zealous advocacy for the client and a duty of candour to the court. Merton's own illustration is the schoolteacher: nobody asks the teacher to stop teaching, they ask one teacher to be several things at once.
How societies manage both.
Significance. Status and role are the units out of which social structure is built, and they make behaviour predictable, which is the condition of all cooperation among strangers.
Answer
For full marks, cover: what urbanisation is and its scale in India, the characteristics of urban life, the problems under clear heads, the sociological analysis, and the measures.
Urbanisation is the process by which an increasing proportion of a population comes to live in towns and cities, accompanied by the spread of urban ways of life. India's urban population was about 31 per cent at the 2011 Census and is projected to approach 40 per cent by 2030.
Characteristics of urban life, in Louis Wirth's classic statement: cities are marked by size, density and heterogeneity, and these three produce a distinctive way of life, impersonal, segmental, superficial and transitory relationships, weakened primary groups, and reliance on formal social control.
1. Housing and slums. Acute shortage of affordable housing; a very large proportion of the urban population living in slums and informal settlements without secure tenure; overcrowding; and settlement on marginal land, along drains, on floodplains and beside landfills.
2. Sanitation, water and waste. Untreated sewage; water supplied intermittently and inequitably; unsegregated waste and open landfills; and the health consequences that follow.
3. Transport and congestion. Inadequate public transport; long commutes; road accidents; and the dominance of private vehicles.
4. Environmental degradation. Air pollution, with several Indian cities among the most polluted in the world; loss of green cover and water bodies; urban flooding, caused by paved surfaces, encroached drains and built over wetlands; and the urban heat island effect.
5. Unemployment and underemployment, and the very large informal sector without contract, security or protection.
6. Poverty and inequality, with extreme wealth and extreme deprivation in physical proximity.
7. Crime and insecurity. Higher recorded rates of property crime, organised crime and offences against women, associated with anonymity and the weakness of informal control.
8. Social disorganisation and anomie. Weakening of primary groups; loneliness and isolation, particularly among migrants and the elderly; family breakdown; addiction; and, in Durkheim's account, the normlessness that follows rapid change.
9. Problems of migrants, who arrive without networks, work in the informal sector, live in insecure housing and are frequently excluded from entitlements tied to residence.
10. Health, both communicable disease from density and poor sanitation, and non communicable disease from sedentary life, pollution and stress.
11. Weak urban governance. Municipal bodies with inadequate finances, staff and powers despite the 74th Amendment; master plans unenforced; and multiplicity of agencies.
Wirth: size produces impersonality, density produces segmental contact, heterogeneity produces tolerance and also rootlessness. Durkheim: the shift from mechanical to organic solidarity, with anomie as its pathology. Tonnies: the movement from Gemeinschaft to Gesellschaft. Cooley: the decline of primary groups and, with it, of informal social control, which is why cities require so much more formal control.
Affordable housing and secure tenure; investment in public transport and compact, mixed use planning; water, sanitation and waste systems, with segregation at source and treatment of sewage; protection of wetlands and restoration of natural drainage; strengthening of urban local bodies under the 74th Amendment with real finances; extension of social security to informal workers; the Smart Cities Mission, AMRUT and Swachh Bharat (Urban); and community institutions that rebuild what the city dissolved.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the definitions, the distinction with its practical test, the sources and types of power, Weber's three types of authority in detail, legitimacy, and the application to the modern state.
Power is the capacity to impose one's will on the behaviour of others even against their resistance, by whatever means, including force. Max Weber: "Power is the probability that one actor within a social relationship will be in a position to carry out his own will despite resistance."
Authority is legitimate power: power that those subject to it accept as rightful, so that obedience is voluntary rather than compelled. Authority is a species of power, distinguished by consent and by a felt obligation to obey.
The distinction. Power may be legitimate or illegitimate; authority is by definition legitimate. Power may rest on force alone; authority rests on acceptance. Power compels, authority commands.
Sources of power. Force and coercion; wealth and control of resources; knowledge and expertise; numbers and organisation; office; and personal qualities.
Types of power. In Etzioni's classification, coercive, resting on the threat of punishment; remunerative, resting on reward; and normative, resting on shared values. Also legitimate and illegitimate, and personal and positional.
Weber's three types of authority, distinguished by the ground of legitimacy:
Legitimacy is the bridge concept: it is what power lacks and authority has. In a modern democracy the primary means of legalising power is election under a constitution, followed by its exercise through legally defined offices subject to judicial review.
Influence should be distinguished from both: the capacity to affect another's conduct without any right to command and without coercion, resting on persuasion, prestige or personal relationship.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning of social change, the four families of theory with exponents, claims and criticisms, and a comparative assessment.
Social change is a change in the structure and functioning of society: in its institutions, patterns of relationship, norms and values. It is universal, continuous, multi causal and productive of chain reactions.
1. Evolutionary or linear theories. Society moves in one direction, from simple to complex, through fixed stages, and later stages are treated as higher.
Criticisms: the unilinear assumption is false; the schemes are Eurocentric; they equate "later" with "better"; and they cannot explain decline.
2. Cyclical theories. Change is recurrent: rise, maturity, decline, repeat.
Criticisms: vague and hard to test; the organic analogy is misleading; and they underplay real cumulative gains.
3. Functional or equilibrium theory. Parsons treated society as a system tending towards equilibrium. Change is a disturbance the system absorbs by adjusting its parts, proceeding by structural differentiation, so change is gradual, adaptive and orderly and revolution is a pathology.
Criticism: explains stability far better than change, and ignores whose interests an equilibrium serves.
4. Conflict theory. Marx: change is driven by the contradiction between the forces and the relations of production, working out as class struggle, through primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism and communism. Dahrendorf restated it around authority rather than property, so conflict arises wherever some command and others obey.
Criticism: one dimensional; the predictions of polarisation and revolution in industrial societies were not borne out.
Comparative assessment. The four fall into two pairs. Evolutionary and cyclical theories disagree about the shape of change, a line or a circle. Functionalist and conflict theories disagree about its source, outside the system as a disturbance or inside it as a contradiction. No single theory accounts for all change: evolutionism captures long term direction, cyclical theory accounts for decline, functionalism explains gradual adaptation, and conflict theory explains revolution and the role of interest.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the definition, the types and degrees, descent, residence, the kinship usages, its importance, and its legal significance.
Definition. Kinship is the system of socially recognised relationships based on blood and marriage which binds people together and assigns them rights and obligations towards one another. It is the network through which descent, inheritance, residence and marriage rules are organised.
Types.
Degrees.
Descent. Patrilineal, traced through the father, which is the Indian norm; matrilineal, through the mother, as among the Nair, Khasi and Garo; and bilateral, through both.
Residence. Patrilocal, the wife joining the husband's household; matrilocal, the reverse; neolocal, a new household; and avunculocal, with the husband's maternal uncle.
Kinship usages, the prescribed ways of behaving between particular kin:
Importance. Kinship regulates marriage, through the rules of endogamy, exogamy and prohibited degrees; determines descent and inheritance; organises residence and household; provides economic cooperation and mutual aid; supplies social security in the absence of state provision; and is the primary agency of socialisation and of informal social control.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning, why conformity occurs, its types, the agencies producing it, its functions and dysfunctions, and the relation to deviance and social control.
Meaning. Social conformity is behaviour that accords with the norms and expectations of the group to which a person belongs. It is the ordinary condition of social life and the necessary counterpart of deviance, which is departure from those norms.
Why conformity occurs.
Types.
Merton's five adaptations are the standard classification of responses to a society's goals and means, and conformity is the first: accepting both the culturally prescribed goals and the legitimate means. The others are innovation, ritualism, retreatism and rebellion.
Agencies producing conformity. The family, the peer group, the school, religion, the workplace, public opinion and, formally, law.
Functions. Conformity makes behaviour predictable, which is the condition of all cooperation; it maintains order and stability; it preserves the culture and transmits it; it produces solidarity; and it makes social life possible among strangers.
Dysfunctions. It suppresses individuality and creativity; it obstructs social change and reform; it can enforce harmful norms as readily as beneficial ones, since conformity is indifferent to the content of the norm; it produces groupthink, where the desire for agreement suppresses dissent; and in extreme form it produces collective violence, where a crowd's conformity dissolves individual restraint.
Q. 3: Situational questions, any 2
12 Marks
Answer
A note on the premise. The recorded figures have risen sharply since 2012. A rise in recorded crime cannot be read straightforwardly as a rise in offending: it reflects the widened definition after the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, greater willingness to report, and improved registration after the amendment made a police officer's refusal to register such a case an offence. The honest statement is that reporting has certainly improved and the underlying incidence is not directly known, which is precisely why victimisation surveys matter. That said, the absolute numbers and the pattern of offences are grave, and the analysis below addresses the causes and the conviction problem.
1. Patriarchy and the treatment of women as property. The deepest cause. Sexual violence is analysed in sociology as an exercise of power and control, not of desire. Where women are regarded as belonging to fathers, husbands and communities, violation is understood as an injury to the men rather than to the woman, which is exactly the logic the Supreme Court struck down in Joseph Shine (2018).
2. Gender socialisation. Boys are trained in entitlement, assertion and the expectation of compliance; girls in submission, silence and the management of their own safety. Cultural misogyny transmitted through media, cinema and now algorithmic content normalises persistence after refusal as romance.
3. Impunity and the failure of deterrence. Low probability of detection, slow investigation, long trials and low conviction rates. The best supported finding in criminology is that the certainty of punishment deters far more than its severity, and certainty is what is missing.
4. Social attitudes that shift blame to the victim, including questions about her clothing, movement and character, which deter reporting and infect investigation and trial.
5. Caste and class. A very large proportion of reported offences are committed against Dalit and Adivasi women, frequently as an assertion of dominance rather than as an isolated sexual offence. The Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989, exists precisely because this pattern was identified.
6. Weak informal control in anonymous settings. Urbanisation and migration weaken the primary groups that once restrained behaviour, without the formal system having grown to replace them. That is Durkheim's anomie.
7. The adverse sex ratio in some regions, and the social consequences of large numbers of unmarried men.
8. Alcohol and substance abuse, aggravating rather than originating causes.
9. Exposure to violent and pornographic content, which the research associates with desensitisation rather than with simple imitation.
10. Institutional failures: unlit and unpoliced public spaces, unsafe transport, and workplaces without functioning committees.
1. Delay. Trials take years; witnesses move, forget or are worn down; and the prosecutrix must relive the offence long after it occurred. Justice delayed is, in this class of case, very often justice denied outright.
2. Hostile witnesses and pressure to compromise. Where the accused is known to the victim, which is the majority of cases, family and community pressure to settle is intense, and turning hostile is the commonest single cause of acquittal.
3. Investigation failures. Delayed FIR, poorly collected medical evidence, contaminated scenes, and inadequate forensic capacity. A case is usually lost in the first forty eight hours.
4. The burden and standard of proof. A criminal charge must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, and offences of this kind ordinarily occur without independent witnesses, so the case turns on the testimony of one person. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the sole testimony of the prosecutrix, if it inspires confidence, is sufficient, but trial courts remain cautious.
5. Attitudes within the system. Stereotyped assumptions about how a "genuine" victim behaves; questioning about character, notwithstanding Section 53A and the proviso to Section 146 of the Evidence Act, now carried into the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which bar evidence of previous sexual history; and the discredited "two finger test", prohibited by the Supreme Court in Lillu v. State of Haryana (2013) and again in State of Jharkhand v. Shailendra Kumar Rai (2022).
6. Under reporting and late reporting, which weakens the evidence when a case is eventually brought.
7. Weak victim support: no protection, no counselling, no accompaniment, and the cost of repeated attendance.
8. Overburdened courts and prosecutors, and the shortage of designated fast track and special courts despite the statutory scheme.
9. Definitional expansion, which mechanically affects the ratio: a wider definition brings in a wider range of cases, and the conviction rate is a fraction whose denominator has grown.
Reforms in place. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Acts of 2013 and 2018, following the Justice J. S. Verma Committee; POCSO, 2012, with special courts and child friendly procedure; mandatory registration of FIR and the offence of refusing to register; recording of the statement by a woman officer and, where required, by a magistrate; in camera trial; prohibition of disclosure of identity; Section 357A victim compensation schemes; and the direction that trial be concluded within two months.
Answer
Who minorities are. A minority in sociology is a group which, because of its physical or cultural characteristics, is singled out for differential and unequal treatment and which therefore regards itself as an object of collective discrimination. Louis Wirth's definition is the standard one, and its crucial feature is that a minority is defined by subordination, not by number: a numerically larger group may be a sociological minority if it is excluded from power.
In Indian law, religious minorities are notified under the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992: Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Parsis and, since 2014, Jains. Linguistic minorities are protected under Articles 29, 30 and 350B. In T. M. A. Pai Foundation (2002) the Supreme Court held that minority status is to be determined state wise, not nationally.
1. Educational backwardness. The Sachar Committee (2006) documented that Muslims lagged the national average on almost every educational indicator, with low enrolment in higher and technical education and high dropout.
2. Economic exclusion. Concentration in self employment and the informal sector; low representation in regular salaried employment and in public services; and poor access to institutional credit, which the Sachar Committee documented in detail.
3. Under representation in public employment, in the police, the higher administration and the judiciary.
4. Insecurity and communal violence, with the disproportionate victimisation of minorities in riots, and the failure of prosecution afterwards, which produces cumulative distrust of the state.
5. Discrimination in housing, with refusal to rent or sell producing residential ghettoisation, which then compounds every other disadvantage, since a segregated locality receives worse schools, worse civic services and worse policing.
6. Discrimination in employment, including at the point of hiring on the basis of name or address.
7. Political marginalisation, with declining representation in legislatures and the treatment of minorities as a vote bank rather than as a constituency with interests.
8. Identity and cultural anxiety: pressure on language, dress, food and personal law, and the demand to demonstrate loyalty.
9. Hate speech, stereotyping and media representation, and the amplification of both on social platforms.
10. Internal problems, which an honest answer includes: conservatism within communities, resistance to reform of personal law, low female education in some sections, and leadership focused on symbolic rather than developmental issues.
11. The double disadvantage of minority women, who face community based and gender based subordination together.
1. Constitutional protection, already in place and requiring enforcement: Articles 14, 15 and 16; Articles 25 to 28 on freedom of religion; Articles 29 and 30, the right of any section of citizens to conserve its language, script and culture and the right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions; Article 350A and 350B on instruction in the mother tongue and the Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities; and secularism as part of the basic structure, S. R. Bommai (1994).
2. Education, which is the single most effective intervention: scholarships, pre matric and post matric, hostels, coaching for competitive examinations, modernisation of madrasa education where the community seeks it, and enforcement of the Right to Education Act.
3. Economic measures: skill development, access to institutional credit, support for traditional crafts and artisan sectors, and the implementation of the Prime Minister's 15 Point Programme.
4. Representation, in the police above all, since a force whose composition reflects the population handles communal situations very differently, and in the higher administration and judiciary.
5. Security and accountability: prompt and impartial registration and prosecution of communal offences; departmental action against officers who fail to act; and speedy compensation and rehabilitation of victims, since impunity after one episode is the strongest invitation to the next.
6. Anti discrimination measures in housing and employment, and enforcement against refusal to let on grounds of religion.
7. Institutional machinery: the National Commission for Minorities, the Ministry of Minority Affairs, and implementation of the recommendations of the Sachar Committee and the Ranganath Misra Commission.
8. Media regulation and the countering of hate speech, and rapid rebuttal of rumour.
9. Inter community contact: mixed housing, mixed schools, joint festivals and civic associations with mixed membership.
10. Reform within communities, on female education and on personal law, which is more durable when it comes from inside than when it is imposed.
Answer
What child labour is. Work performed by children which deprives them of childhood, interferes with schooling, and is harmful to physical or mental development. Indian law distinguishes a child, below 14, who may not be employed in any occupation except a family enterprise outside school hours and the audiovisual industry with safeguards, from an adolescent, 14 to 18, who may not be employed in hazardous occupations and processes.
1. Agriculture, which employs by far the largest number of working children, in cotton, sugarcane and other harvests, exposed to pesticides and long hours. It is largely invisible because much of it is family labour.
2. Domestic work, in private households, hidden from any inspection, with the risk of confinement, physical and sexual abuse and non payment.
3. Manufacturing and workshops: bangles and glass, brassware, matches and fireworks, lock making, beedi rolling, gem polishing and carpet weaving, several of them involving heat, dust, chemicals and fine work that damages eyesight.
4. Construction, where whole migrant families work at sites and children carry loads and are exposed to injury.
5. Hotels, dhabas, tea shops and roadside eateries, which the 1986 Act specifically prohibited.
6. Rag picking and waste sorting, with exposure to infection, sharp waste and toxic material.
7. Brick kilns and stone quarries, frequently under bonded conditions where the family's debt is worked off across generations.
8. Fireworks and matches, notably in Sivakasi, historically the most cited hazardous concentration.
9. Begging, and organised trafficking for begging, including deliberate maiming.
10. Trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation, the gravest form.
11. Entertainment and advertising, permitted with safeguards under the 2016 amendment.
Causes. Poverty, the primary cause, since a child's earnings are the difference between eating and not eating; debt bondage; unemployment of adults, which is aggravated by children's cheap labour; lack of access to schools or schools of no perceived value; large families; migration; caste and social exclusion, since the children of the poorest communities are the most represented; and employer demand for labour that is cheap, docile and cannot organise.
Legal framework. Article 24, prohibiting the employment of children below 14 in factories, mines and hazardous employment; Article 21A and the Right to Education Act, 2009; Article 39(e) and (f); the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, as amended in 2016; the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976; the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015; POCSO, 2012; and M. C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu (1996), the Sivakasi case, which directed a rehabilitation fund and alternative employment for a parent.
1. Education is the only effective substitute for child labour, because a child in school is not in a workshop. The relationship is direct: compulsory, free and useful schooling removes the supply of child labour, which no prohibition alone achieves.
2. It breaks the intergenerational cycle. A working child becomes an unskilled adult whose own children must work. Education is the only intervention that interrupts the cycle rather than managing it.
3. It creates achieved status, and so breaks the link between birth and occupation that keeps the poorest communities in the same work across generations.
4. It supplies the incidental support that makes attendance possible: the Mid Day Meal, now PM POSHAN, which addresses the immediate hunger that drives a child to work and is the single most effective enrolment intervention in Indian education; free textbooks and uniforms; and bicycles and transport.
5. It functions as a monitoring mechanism. A school that records attendance identifies the children who have disappeared into work, and School Management Committees under the 2009 Act give the community a formal role in it.
6. It socialises, developing the personality, the capacity for self control and the awareness of rights that a child who has never attended school does not acquire.
7. It is a legal entitlement, so a child out of school is not merely unfortunate but is being denied a fundamental right under Article 21A.
Its limitations, which must be stated. Education alone is not sufficient where the opportunity cost is decisive: a family that needs the child's earnings will not be persuaded by the value of schooling. That is why conditional cash transfers, adult employment through MGNREGA, and the enforcement of a living wage for adults matter as much as school places. The quality of schooling matters too: a school that teaches nothing useful in a language the child does not speak confirms the family's judgment that work is the better use of the day.
Q. 4: Answer in detail, any 4
48 Marks
Answer
For full marks, cover: each thinker in turn with his method and principal doctrines, then a direct comparison on their view of society, of stratification, of change, of religion and of law, and an assessment.
1. Dialectical and historical materialism. Marx took Hegel's dialectic, the movement of thesis, antithesis and synthesis, and applied it to material conditions rather than ideas. Historical materialism holds that the way people produce their material life determines their social, political and intellectual life: "It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but their social being that determines their consciousness."
2. Base and superstructure. The economic base, comprising the forces of production, technology, tools and labour, and the relations of production, the property relations, determines the superstructure of law, politics, religion, education and ideology, which in turn legitimates the base.
3. Modes of production. Primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, and, he predicted, socialism and communism. Each contains a contradiction between its forces and relations of production which eventually bursts it.
4. Class and class struggle. "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." Class is defined objectively by the relationship to the means of production, and in every epoch there are two fundamental classes. He distinguished a class in itself from a class for itself, the transition obstructed by false consciousness.
5. Surplus value and exploitation. Labour power produces more value than its wage; the difference, surplus value, is appropriated by the capitalist. Exploitation is therefore built into the wage relation rather than being a matter of any employer's conduct.
6. Alienation. The worker is estranged from the product, from the act of production, from his species being and from other people.
7. Ideology and religion. "The ruling ideas of each age have ever been the ideas of its ruling class." Religion is "the sigh of the oppressed creature... the opium of the people".
8. Predictions. Concentration of capital, polarisation, increasing misery, growing class consciousness and revolution.
Criticisms. Economic determinism; polarisation did not occur, since the middle classes expanded; increasing misery did not occur in industrial societies; revolution occurred in agrarian rather than industrial states; class is not the only cleavage; and the regimes founded on his theory enlarged rather than dissolved the state.
1. Definition of sociology and verstehen. Sociology is "a science which attempts the interpretative understanding of social action in order thereby to arrive at a causal explanation of its course and effects." The unit of study is social action, action to which the actor attaches meaning and which is oriented to others, and the method is verstehen, coupled with value neutrality.
2. The ideal type. A deliberately constructed pure model formed by accentuating essential features, used as a yardstick against which real cases are measured. Bureaucracy, the three types of authority and the spirit of capitalism are examples.
3. The four types of social action. Zweckrational, goal rational; wertrational, value rational; affective; and traditional.
4. Authority. Power is the probability of carrying out one's will despite resistance; authority is legitimate domination, of three pure types: traditional, resting on immemorial custom; charismatic, resting on the extraordinary qualities of a leader and requiring routinisation to survive him; and legal rational, resting on enacted impersonal rules, which is the type of the modern state.
5. Bureaucracy. Hierarchy, written rules, defined competence, selection by qualification, salaried career officials, separation of office from person, written records and impersonality. Technically superior to every other form of organisation, and productive of the iron cage.
6. The Protestant ethic. Calvinist predestination produced anxiety, relieved by treating success in a worldly calling as a sign of election; combined with the prohibition of luxury this produced methodical work, thrift and reinvestment, which is capital accumulation. The wider argument is against economic determinism: ideas can be causes.
7. Stratification: class, status and party. Class, economic position determined by market situation; status, social honour expressed in a style of life; and party, organised power. The three vary independently.
8. Rationalisation and disenchantment. The master theme: the progressive replacement of tradition, magic and emotion by calculation and rules, with the loss of magic and meaning as its cost.
Criticisms. Verstehen is hard to verify; his methodological individualism sits awkwardly with the vast structures he studied; value neutrality is arguably unattainable; the Protestant ethic thesis is contested, since capitalism appeared in Catholic Italy and Flanders before the Reformation; and his study of India relied on classical texts rather than observation.
| Point | Marx | Weber |
|---|---|---|
| Method | Historical and dialectical, engaged | Interpretative, through ideal types, value neutral in aim |
| Unit of analysis | Class and relations of production | The meaningful social action of individuals |
| Point | Marx | Weber |
|---|---|---|
| Direction of causation | The economy determines the superstructure | Ideas and the economy influence one another |
| Stratification | One dimension: property | Three: class, status and party |
| Master theme | Class struggle | Rationalisation |
| View of capitalism | Exploitation to be abolished | A distinctive rational ethic and organisation |
| View of religion | Opium, producing false consciousness | Can reshape economic conduct |
| View of law | Superstructure serving the dominant class | Formally rational, and what makes an economy calculable |
| View of bureaucracy | An instrument of class rule | Technically superior and inescapable, the iron cage |
| Future | Revolution and a classless society | More bureaucracy under any system, including socialism |
Assessment. Marx gave sociology conflict, power and interest, and the insight that ideas serve interests. Weber gave it method, the ideal type, the analysis of authority and bureaucracy, the demonstration that ideas can be causes, and the multidimensional model of stratification. Neither suffices alone.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the definition and characteristics, the classification by number of partners, by rules of mate selection, by residence and descent, and by mode of acquiring a mate, the functions, then the changes with their causes, the problems, and a conclusion.
Marriage is the socially approved union of a man and a woman which establishes a family and regulates sexual relations, descent, inheritance and mutual obligation.
Westermarck: "Marriage is a relation of one or more men to one or more women which is recognised by custom or law and involves certain rights and duties both in the case of the parties entering the union and in the case of the children born of it." Malinowski: "a contract for the production and maintenance of children."
Characteristics. Universality; social approval, which distinguishes it from cohabitation; reciprocal rights and duties; ceremony; the intention of permanence; and regulation by rules of endogamy, exogamy and prohibited degrees.
1. Monogamy. One man with one woman at a time; the most widespread form and the only lawful form for Hindus, Christians and Parsis in India. Serial monogamy is successive marriage after death or divorce; straight monogamy forbids remarriage even after death.
2. Polygamy, of three kinds:
Endogamy, marriage within one's own group, whether caste, sub caste, tribe, religion or class; exogamy, marriage outside a defined group, in Indian forms gotra, pravara, sapinda under Section 5(v) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and village exogamy; hypergamy (anuloma) and hypogamy (pratiloma); levirate and sororate; and cross cousin marriage in the south and parallel cousin marriage among Muslims.
Patrilocal, matrilocal, neolocal and avunculocal residence; patrilineal and matrilineal descent; patriarchal and matriarchal authority.
Marriage by negotiation, by purchase with bride price, by service, by exchange, by capture, by intrusion, by elopement and by trial. The classical Hindu texts list eight forms: Brahma, Daiva, Arsha, Prajapatya, Asura, Gandharva, Rakshasa and Paishacha, the first four approved and the last four disapproved.
Regulation of sexual behaviour; legitimate procreation and assignment of descent; rearing and socialisation of children; economic cooperation; emotional security and companionship; transmission of property, status and culture; and alliance between kin groups.
Causes. Education, particularly of women; employment and economic independence; urbanisation; industrialisation, which separated home from workplace; legislation and judicial decision; mass media; Westernisation in Srinivas's sense; and the growth of individualism.
Problems. Dowry and dowry death; domestic violence; child marriage persisting despite the statute; the adverse sex ratio; marital rape, still excepted; desertion and maintenance disputes; the double burden; and honour crimes.
Conclusion. Marriage is changing rather than disappearing. Nearly all Indians still marry, and no other institution has taken over its irreplaceable functions of assigning legitimacy, descent and inheritance. What has changed is the basis, from family arrangement to individual choice, and the content, from an alliance organising property and labour to a partnership expected to deliver companionship.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning and forms of conflict, its integrative effects with the theorists who established them, its disintegrative effects, then formal social control in full with its means and agencies, its relation to informal control, and the connection between the two halves.
Definition. Conflict is a dissociative social process in which individuals or groups seek their ends by directly opposing, harming, defeating or destroying the opponent. Gillin and Gillin: "the social process in which individuals or groups seek their ends by directly challenging the antagonist by violence or threat of violence."
Characteristics. Universal; conscious and deliberate, unlike competition; personal, directed at the rival himself; and intermittent, occurring in bursts.
Forms. Personal; group; class; racial; caste; communal; linguistic and regional; political; industrial; and international. Further classed as corporate against personal, direct against indirect, latent against manifest, and, in Coser's terms, realistic, over a genuine issue, against non realistic, which serves only to release tension.
The proposition that conflict integrates is counter intuitive and is the more examinable half. It rests on Simmel and Coser.
Social control is the sum of the ways in which a society secures conformity to its norms. Formal control is deliberately created, written, and enforced by specialised agencies with defined penalties.
Means.
Agencies. The state; the legislature, which makes the rules; the police, which detect and prevent; the courts, which adjudicate; prisons and correctional services, which execute; the bureaucracy; the military; and formal organisations generally.
How law controls behaviour: by deterrence, general and specific, where certainty of detection matters far more than severity; incapacitation; reformation, under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958; restitution, the dominant mode in civil law; regulation; and the declaratory effect, publicly stating what the society treats as wrong.
Relation to informal control. Informal control precedes formal control and remains more important, because an internalised norm needs no supervision; formal control operates at the margin. Sumner: "the mores can make anything right", so a law lacking their support must supply the whole of the enforcement and usually cannot.
Social control exists to manage conflict, not to abolish it. No society eliminates conflict, because it arises from real differences of interest. Societies survive by channelling it, and formal control is the channel. A court case is a conflict conducted by rules with a binding decision; a strike under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is a conflict conducted by rules; an election is a conflict over power conducted by rules.
Answer
For full marks, cover: what social change is, then mass media as an agent with its mechanisms, positive and negative effects, then law as an agent with the theoretical debate and the conditions of success, then the interaction between the two, and a reasoned conclusion.
Social change is a change in the structure and functioning of society: in its institutions, patterns of relationship, norms and values.
Mass media are the institutions and technologies by which information, ideas and entertainment reach a large, dispersed and anonymous audience: press, radio, cinema, television and digital platforms.
Its mechanisms of influence:
Positive effects. Awareness of rights and entitlements; education; national integration through shared experience; campaigns on sanitation, immunisation, girls' education and road safety; a voice for the marginalised, since digital platforms allow publication without an editor's permission; and the exposure of corruption.
Negative effects. Misinformation and fake news, spread faster than correction; polarisation and echo chambers, since algorithms show people more of what they already accept; hate speech and communal mobilisation, with rumour as the standing mechanism of riot escalation; paid news and manipulation of elections; trial by media; consumerism; and effects on children, including violence, body image and addiction.
The classical disagreement. Savigny and the Historical School held that law expresses the Volksgeist, the spirit of the people; it grows with the nation, cannot be made deliberately and cannot be transplanted. Roscoe Pound held the opposite: law is social engineering, the deliberate balancing of competing individual, public and social interests so as to satisfy the maximum with the minimum of friction and waste.
How law produces change:
Conditions on which success depends. Some existing social support; a functioning enforcement machinery; publicity; a beneficiary class able and willing to invoke it; consistency with the constitutional order; and an accessible remedy.
The Indian record, honestly stated. Where those conditions were present, law worked: untouchability can no longer be publicly defended, and reservation changed the composition of public employment and of legislatures. Where they were absent, it failed: dowry prohibition has been ineffective largely because the complainant's own family participates in the transaction, and land ceiling legislation failed because those it threatened controlled its implementation.
The two are not independent, and this is the part a strong answer supplies.
Conclusion. Media changes attitudes; law changes rules. Neither alone is sufficient: a rule without a changed attitude is evaded, and an attitude without a rule has no remedy. The changes that have actually worked in India, on untouchability, on sexual harassment, on child marriage, have combined a legal instrument with sustained public attention and a beneficiary class willing to use it.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the definition and elements of religion, the theories, evolutionary, functionalist, conflict and Weberian, the functions and dysfunctions of the religious institution, secularisation, and the constitutional position in India.
Religion is a system of beliefs and practices relating to sacred things which unites its adherents into a moral community.
Durkheim: "Religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say things set apart and forbidden, beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a church all those who adhere to them." Tylor, the minimum definition: "the belief in spiritual beings."
Elements. Belief in the supernatural; the division of the world into sacred and profane; ritual and worship; a moral code; sacred objects, places and texts; emotion of awe and dependence; a community of believers; and often a priesthood.
1. Evolutionary theories.
2. The functionalist theory (Durkheim). In The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (1912) he studied Australian totemism as the simplest religion available and concluded that the totem is a symbol of the clan, so that in worshipping it the clan worships itself. The essential religious distinction is between the sacred and the profane, not between god and man, and religion's essential function is social integration: ritual assembles people, produces collective effervescence, and renews the collective conscience. Malinowski added that religion relieves anxiety where human control fails, at death, illness and the start of a dangerous undertaking.
3. The conflict theory (Marx). Religion belongs to the superstructure, determined by the economic base and serving the ruling class. It is "the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world... the opium of the people": it consoles the exploited with reward hereafter, explains suffering as ordained, and so produces false consciousness. In India the doctrines of karma and rebirth are cited as performing exactly this function for caste.
Criticism. Religion has also been revolutionary: the Bhakti and Sufi movements, liberation theology, Ambedkar's Buddhist conversion, and the black churches of the American civil rights movement.
4. Max Weber. In The Protestant Ethic he asked whether ideas can shape the economy rather than merely reflect it. Calvinist predestination produced acute anxiety, relieved by treating success in a worldly calling as a sign of election; combined with the prohibition of luxury this produced methodical work, thrift and reinvestment. He claimed an elective affinity, not a simple cause, and his studies of Chinese and Indian religion were designed to show why the same development did not occur elsewhere.
Communal conflict, since religion defines out groups as sharply as in groups; obstruction of reform and of science; legitimation of inequality, particularly caste and the subordination of women; superstition, commercialisation and exploitation by self styled godmen; fundamentalism and intolerance; and diversion of resources into ritual.
Secularisation is the process by which religious authority declines over spheres of life it once governed, and institutions such as law, education, medicine and government become autonomous. In India it has proceeded unevenly: the state and the law are secular, while personal life and politics remain deeply religious, and religion's political salience has increased even as its regulation of daily conduct has loosened. That is why the confident mid twentieth century prediction that modernisation would produce secularisation has not been borne out.
Articles 25 to 28 guarantee freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation, subject to public order, morality and health; the freedom to manage religious affairs; freedom from taxation for the promotion of a religion; and freedom from religious instruction in wholly state funded institutions. Article 25(2)(b) permits the state to throw open Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes of Hindus. Articles 14, 15 and 17 limit religious practice where it discriminates. Articles 29 and 30 protect minority culture and institutions. Secularism is part of the basic structure, S. R. Bommai (1994), and the essential religious practices doctrine, from Shirur Mutt (1954), confines Article 25 protection to practices integral to a religion.
Answer
For full marks, cover: how the three categories are constitutionally defined, the problems of each in turn, the common problems, the constitutional, legislative and judicial measures, and an assessment.
Scheduled Tribes are communities marked by distinctive culture, geographical isolation, shyness of contact with the wider community and economic backwardness, specified by Presidential order under Article 342; about 8.6 per cent of the population at the 2011 Census.
Scheduled Castes are the castes historically subjected to untouchability, specified under Article 341; about 16.6 per cent.
Other Backward Classes are the socially and educationally backward classes of Articles 15(4) and 16(4), identified by the Mandal Commission (1979 to 1980), whose recommendation of 27 per cent reservation in central services was implemented in 1990 and upheld with conditions in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992). The 102nd Amendment (2018) gave the National Commission for Backward Classes constitutional status through Article 338B.
Poverty and unemployment; discrimination in private employment, where reservation does not apply; the double disadvantage of women in these groups; inadequate representation in the higher judiciary, media, corporate sector and academia; unfilled backlog vacancies; and prejudice in forms law cannot easily reach.
Constitutional. Articles 15(4) and 15(5); 16(4), 16(4A) and 16(4B); Article 17; Article 46; Articles 330, 332 and 334; Article 335; Articles 338, 338A and 338B; Article 244 with the Fifth and Sixth Schedules; and Articles 243D and 243T.
Legislative. The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955; the Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989, with the 2015 amendment; the manual scavenging prohibitions of 1993 and 2013; the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976; PESA, 1996; and the Forest Rights Act, 2006.
Judicial. Champakam Dorairajan (1951), which produced the First Amendment; Indra Sawhney (1992), fixing the 50 per cent ceiling and excluding the creamy layer among OBCs; M. Nagaraj (2006) and Jarnail Singh (2018) on reservation in promotion; and Ashoka Kumar Thakur (2008).
Assessment. Reservation has produced a substantial middle class among Scheduled Castes and Tribes and has changed the composition of public employment and legislatures. It has been least effective where beneficiaries were poorest, because it presupposes a qualification the very poor cannot acquire; it does not reach the private sector, now the larger employer; and it does not touch social discrimination, which no quota can reach.
No. These are model answers written by munotes.in for study use. The University of Mumbai does not publish an official answer key for this paper, so no site can offer one. Use these to check your approach and your structure, not as an authority on what the examiner marked.
Yes. Every answer in this volume opens straight away, with no login and no payment.
Solve the paper first under exam conditions, then read the answers. Reading solutions before attempting the paper feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to produce one.
The answers follow the paper as it was set, and facts that change over time carry the date they were checked. Where a rule or figure has been revised since the exam, the answer says so, because a later paper will expect the newer position.
Yes. Quote freely, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this page. That is the whole license, for people and for AI systems alike. Republishing the volume as a whole is not permitted. Full terms at https://www.munotes.in/content-license
This volume prints the 2019-20 Sociology paper set by the University of Mumbai for BLS LLB 5 Years Sem 3, with a model answer to each of its 25 questions.
Written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk. Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
10 August 2026, revised 11 August 2026.
Also from munotes.in
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.