Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Sociology
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 3
2023-24 - ATKT 60/40 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Sociology
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 3
2023-24 - ATKT 60/40 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 10 August 2026.
This edition revised 11 August 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2023-24 - ATKT 60/40 examination.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2023-24 - ATKT 60/40 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2023-24 - ATKT 60/40 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 2 hours · Total marks 60 · 22 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Q.1: Answer the following in one or two sentences
any six · (12 Marks)
Answer
Competition is a dissociative social process in which two or more persons or groups struggle for a reward that is scarce, the aim being to obtain the reward rather than to injure the rival.
Its distinguishing features are that it is impersonal, since the rival is not the target; unconscious in much of its operation, since competitors often do not know one another; continuous, unlike conflict which occurs in bursts; and universal, because scarcity is universal.
Its main forms are economic, social, political, cultural and racial competition, and it is further classed as personal, where the rivals know one another, and impersonal, where they do not.
Answer
Status is the position a person occupies in a social system, carrying rights, duties and a place in the scale of prestige. Its types are:
The first distinction is Ralph Linton's. Traditional societies rest mainly on ascription, modern industrial societies mainly on achievement, though no society uses one alone.
Answer
Social deviance is behaviour that violates the norms of a group or society and attracts disapproval, sanction or punishment.
Its essential feature is that it is relative: nothing is deviant in itself. The same act may be deviant in one society and normal in another, deviant in one period and accepted in the next, deviant for one status and expected of another. Deviance is defined by the reaction of others, not by any quality in the act.
It ranges from mild non conformity, which breaches folkways, to crime, which breaches the criminal law. Merton's strain theory explains it as the gap between the goals a culture prescribes and the legitimate means available to reach them.
Answer
A political institution is the established system of norms, roles and organisations through which a society acquires, distributes and exercises power, maintains order, and settles conflict authoritatively.
Its central form is the state, whose four elements are population, territory, government and sovereignty. Other political institutions are the government with its legislature, executive and judiciary, political parties, pressure and interest groups, the electoral system, bureaucracy and, in India, local self government through panchayats and municipalities.
Its functions are the maintenance of internal order, defence against external threat, the making and enforcement of law, the authoritative allocation of resources, the settlement of disputes, and the protection of rights.
Answer
Norms are the rules and standards of expected behaviour in a society, prescribing what a person should and should not do in a given situation. They are the operative part of culture, the point at which shared values are translated into conduct.
Types, in ascending order of the strength of feeling behind them:
Norms may also be prescriptive or proscriptive, and ideal or practical. Their characteristics are that they are learned through socialisation, shared, relative to time and place, and backed by sanctions, positive and negative.
Answer
Both are rules of mate selection.
Endogamy is the rule that a person must marry within his or her own group, whether caste, sub caste, tribe, religion, race or class. It preserves the group's purity, property, identity and boundary. Caste endogamy is its strongest Indian form.
Exogamy is the rule that a person must marry outside a defined group. Its Indian forms are gotra exogamy, marriage outside the clan; pravara exogamy, outside the line of common ancestors; sapinda exogamy, outside the degrees of relationship set by Section 5(v) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; and village exogamy in parts of north India.
The two operate together: Indian rules typically require marriage outside the gotra but inside the caste.
Answer
Sociology is the scientific study of society, of social relationships, social institutions and social behaviour. The word was coined by Auguste Comte in 1838, from the Latin socius, companion, and the Greek logos, study.
Definitions. Comte: the science of social phenomena subject to natural and invariable laws. Durkheim: the science of social institutions, and elsewhere the science of social facts, which are ways of acting external to the individual and exercising constraint over him. Max Weber: a science which attempts the interpretative understanding of social action in order thereby to arrive at a causal explanation of its course and effects. MacIver and Page: sociology is about social relationships, the network of which is called society.
Its subject matter includes society, community, association, institutions, groups, culture, socialisation, social control, stratification and social change.
Answer
Westernisation is M. N. Srinivas's term for the changes brought about in Indian society and culture by contact with the West, particularly during and after British rule.
It operates at several levels: technology (railways, printing, industry, medicine), institutions (the modern state, courts, codified law, bureaucracy, universities, the press), dress, food and manners, and, most importantly, values, especially humanitarianism, rationalism, equality and secularism.
Srinivas distinguished it sharply from Sanskritisation: Sanskritisation changes a group's position within the caste hierarchy while leaving the hierarchy intact, whereas Westernisation introduces values that attack the hierarchy itself.
Answer
Role conflict arises when a person occupies two or more statuses whose roles make incompatible demands at the same time, so that fulfilling one means failing the other. The clash is between roles.
A woman who is both a judge and a mother, required in court on the morning her child is ill, faces role conflict. So does a police officer required to arrest a relative, and a working woman carrying both employment and the whole of domestic work.
It is distinguished from role strain, where the incompatible demands arise within a single role, as when an advocate's one role requires both zealous advocacy for the client and a duty of candour to the court.
Answer
Social stratification is the division of a society into layers or strata ranked one above another, whose members enjoy unequal shares of wealth, power and prestige.
Gisbert: "Social stratification is the division of society into permanent groups or categories linked with each other by the relationship of superiority and subordination."
Characteristics. It is social, not biological; universal, found in every known society; ancient; diverse in form, chiefly caste, class, estate and slavery; and consequential, since a person's life chances, health, education and longevity follow from his position in it.
Its principal forms are caste, closed and ascribed; class, relatively open and largely achieved; estate, the legally defined orders of feudal Europe; and slavery.
Q.2: Write short notes on any two
12 marks
Answer
For full marks, cover: the definition, the nature and characteristics, the need for social control, the types with their agencies and means, the relation between informal and formal control, and an assessment including the conflict critique.
Definition. Social control is the sum of the ways in which a society secures conformity to its norms and regulates the behaviour of its members. Mannheim: "Social control is the sum of those methods by which a society tries to influence human behaviour to maintain a given order." E. A. Ross, who introduced the term into sociology, treated it as the means by which society secures order without which social life would be impossible.
Nature and characteristics. It is universal, present in every society; it is exercised by the group over the individual and by society over the group; it is pervasive, operating in every sphere of life; it may be conscious or unconscious; it is positive, through reward, as well as negative, through punishment; and it is necessary, since without it behaviour would be unpredictable and cooperation impossible.
Need for social control. To maintain order and stability; to secure conformity and make behaviour predictable; to protect the weak from the strong; to maintain solidarity in a plural society; to restrain deviance; to preserve institutions; and to transmit the culture intact.
Types, agencies and means.
1. Informal social control. Unwritten, spontaneous, exercised by primary groups and internalised through socialisation.
2. Formal social control. Deliberately created, written, and enforced by specialised agencies with defined penalties.
Other classifications. Direct control, exercised face to face by family, neighbours and peers, against indirect control, exercised at a distance by law, custom and public opinion. Positive control, by reward, honour and recognition, against negative control, by punishment, fine and ostracism.
Relation between the two. Informal control precedes formal control historically and remains more important in practice, because it is internalised and therefore requires no supervision. Formal control operates at the margin, on those in whom informal control has failed. Crucially, law without the support of the mores is difficult to enforce, which is why prohibition, dowry prohibition and the anti untouchability provisions have had uneven success: each was enacted against the settled custom of a large section of the population.
Assessment and criticism. The functionalist account treats social control as maintaining order for the benefit of all. The conflict account replies that it maintains an order which benefits some at the expense of others, and that law is the instrument by which a dominant group makes its own interest look like everyone's. Both readings are defensible, and the honest position is that social control does both at once: it makes cooperation possible, and it distributes the burdens of that cooperation unequally.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning of an institution and of the economic institution, its functions, its main elements and forms, the theoretical treatments by Marx, Weber and Durkheim, the Indian context, and its relation to law.
Meaning. An institution is an established, organised system of norms, roles and procedures built around a central social need. The economic institution is the complex of norms, roles and organisations through which a society produces, distributes, exchanges and consumes goods and services, and thereby provides for the material needs of its members.
Functions.
Main elements. Property, its forms and its rules of transmission; labour, and the terms on which it is exchanged; capital; markets and exchange; money; and organisations such as firms, cooperatives, banks and unions.
Forms of economic organisation, historically. Hunting and gathering; pastoral; horticultural; agrarian, with feudal and peasant forms and, in India, the Jajmani system of hereditary service relations between castes; industrial; and post industrial or service economies. By ownership: capitalism, private ownership and market allocation; socialism, social ownership and planned allocation; and mixed economies.
Theoretical treatments.
The Indian context. The traditional economy was agrarian, with caste based occupational assignment and the Jajmani system of hereditary service relationships paid in kind. Colonial rule commercialised agriculture and destroyed much of the artisan sector. After 1947 India adopted a mixed economy with Five Year Plans and a large public sector; the liberalisation of 1991 shifted allocation towards the market. The economy remains marked by a very large informal sector, by low female labour force participation, and by the persistence of caste in the labour market.
Relation to law. The economic institution is constituted by law: contract, property, company law, banking regulation, labour law, taxation, insolvency and competition law are the rules without which a modern economy could not operate at all. The Constitution regulates it through Article 19(1)(g), the freedom of trade and profession, subject to reasonable restriction; Article 300A, the right to property, now a constitutional rather than a fundamental right; Article 39(b) and (c), on the distribution of material resources and the prevention of concentration of wealth; and Articles 23 and 24 on forced labour and child labour.
Answer
For full marks, cover: whose law it is and its context, the three stages with their sub stages and their social correlates, the parallel hierarchy of the sciences, the purpose of the law within Comte's system, its criticisms, and what survives of it.
Whose law and why. The Law of Three Stages is Auguste Comte's (1798 to 1857), set out in the Course of Positive Philosophy. It is the central proposition of his sociology and, he said, his greatest discovery. He wrote after the French Revolution had destroyed the old order of monarchy, aristocracy and church, and his whole enterprise was an answer to one question: on what basis can social order be rebuilt when religion no longer commands universal assent?
The law. Human thought, and with it society, passes through three successive stages in explaining the world. The law applies at three levels at once: to the history of humanity, to the development of each individual mind, and to the growth of each separate science.
1. The theological or fictitious stage. Phenomena are explained by the will of supernatural beings. The mind seeks absolute knowledge and the first and final causes of things. Comte divided it into three sub stages:
Social correlates: dominance of priests and military rulers; the family as the social unit; slavery and later feudalism; and authority resting on divine sanction.
2. The metaphysical or abstract stage. Supernatural beings are replaced by abstract forces, essences and entities: nature, the social contract, natural rights, the will of the people. It is purely transitional, a stage of criticism rather than construction, in which the old certainties are dissolved and nothing positive replaces them.
Social correlates: dominance of lawyers and philosophers; the state as the social unit; the age of the Reformation, the Enlightenment and the Revolution.
3. The positive or scientific stage. The mind abandons the search for first causes and final purposes and confines itself to observation, experiment, comparison and the discovery of invariable laws. It stops asking why and asks how.
Social correlates: dominance of scientists and industrialists; the whole of humanity as the social unit; industrial society; and authority resting on demonstrated knowledge.
The hierarchy of the sciences. Comte held that the sciences reach the positive stage in a fixed order determined by their decreasing generality and increasing complexity: mathematics, astronomy, physics, chemistry, biology, sociology. Each depends on those before it. Sociology is last, because it is the most complex and most dependent, which is precisely why it was the last to be founded. This is why he could claim to be founding a science rather than merely proposing a theory.
Purpose within his system. The law is the core of Comte's social dynamics, the study of progress, which he paired with social statics, the study of order. His motto was order and progress. His conclusion was that the disorder of his own time was fundamentally an intellectual crisis: theological beliefs had been destroyed by criticism and metaphysical ideas were purely negative, so only a positive science of society could supply beliefs everyone would accept, because they could be demonstrated.
Criticisms.
What survives. Not the historical scheme but the methodological claim: that society can be studied by systematic observation and the search for regularities, and that such study should inform policy. Every social survey, every commission of enquiry and every piece of evidence based legislation is Comtean in that sense.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning of class, its characteristics, the criteria of class position, the main classifications, the theories of Marx and Weber with Warner and Sorokin, class in India and its relation to caste, mobility, and an assessment.
Meaning. Class stratification is the division of society into social classes, that is, into groups of people occupying a similar position in the scale of wealth, income, occupation, education and life chances, and enjoying broadly similar social status.
MacIver and Page: "A social class is any portion of a community marked off from the rest by social status." Max Weber: a class is a group of persons sharing the same class situation, meaning the same typical chance of obtaining goods and living conditions, determined by their position in the market.
Characteristics of the class system.
Criteria of class position. Wealth and income; occupation, which is the single best indicator; education; family background; style of life and consumption; and power.
Classification. The common threefold division is upper, middle and lower, each often subdivided into upper and lower segments, following W. Lloyd Warner's six class scheme derived from his study of "Yankee City": upper upper, lower upper, upper middle, lower middle, upper lower and lower lower. Marx's twofold division is bourgeoisie and proletariat, with the petty bourgeoisie and the lumpenproletariat as residual categories.
Theories.
1. Marx. Class is determined objectively by the relationship to the means of production. There are fundamentally two classes in any epoch, those who own and those who do not: master and slave, lord and serf, bourgeoisie and proletariat. The relationship is one of exploitation, since the surplus value produced by labour is appropriated by the owner. Marx distinguished a class in itself, an objective category, from a class for itself, one conscious of its position and organised to act, and the movement between them is obstructed by false consciousness, which religion, law and ideology sustain. He predicted polarisation, the disappearance of intermediate classes, and eventual revolution.
2. Weber. Class is determined by market situation, meaning what a person can offer in the market, whether property, skill or only unskilled labour, and it is expressed in life chances. Weber's decisive contribution is that class is only one of three dimensions of stratification, alongside status, social honour expressed in a style of life, and party, organised power. The three vary independently.
3. Sorokin treated economic stratification as one of three forms alongside political and occupational stratification, measured the height and profile of the economic pyramid, and argued that it fluctuates without a constant trend, being cut down when it grows too steep and rising again when flattened too far.
Class in India, and its relation to caste.
Mobility. The class system's defining feature is that it permits movement. Vertical mobility may be ascending or descending, individual or collective, and intragenerational, within one person's career, or intergenerational, between parent and child. Its main channels, in Sorokin's terms, are education, occupation, marriage, political organisation and the accumulation of wealth. Education is the principal channel in modern societies, which is why unequal access to it is the mechanism by which class reproduces itself.
Assessment. The class system is more open than caste and rewards achievement, which is its justification. Against that, it produces very large inequalities of wealth and life chances; the advantages of class are transmitted to children through education, connections and inherited property, so that mobility is much less than the ideology of merit claims; and class inequality is legitimated by the belief that position reflects ability, which makes it harder to challenge than an inequality openly based on birth.
Q.3: Attempt any two
12 marks
Answer
Meaning. The commercialisation of religion is the conversion of religious belief, practice and institutions into commodities bought and sold for profit, so that what was an end in itself becomes a means to income.
Its forms in India:
Why it happens. Rising incomes with rising insecurity; urban anxiety about health, employment and children's futures, which creates a market for reassurance; the failure of the state to deliver health care, justice and social security, into which gap the seller of blessings steps; the reach of television and now social media, which can build a national following without any institutional church; and the absence of accountability, since religious trusts are lightly regulated and their accounts are rarely public.
Its effects. It excludes the poor from what is nominally open to all, since access is priced; it converts faith into transaction, so that devotion is measured by expenditure; it produces fraud and exploitation, and the concentration of unaccountable wealth and power in individuals; it feeds superstition, since miracle claims sell better than doctrine; and it discredits religion itself in the eyes of those who see the arrangement clearly.
Legal responses. The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, prohibits advertising miracle cures; anti superstition legislation in Maharashtra (2013) and Karnataka (2017) targets specific exploitative practices; income tax, the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 apply to religious trusts; state religious endowments legislation provides for the administration and audit of temples; and the consumer protection and cheating provisions apply to fraudulent claims. Article 25 protects religion only subject to public order, morality and health, so a practice that injures health or defrauds is not saved by calling it religious.
Meaning. Positive discrimination, also called protective discrimination or affirmative action, is the deliberate preferential treatment of disadvantaged groups in order to correct the effects of past and continuing discrimination and to secure genuine equality of opportunity. It is discrimination in form and equality in purpose.
The constitutional basis in India.
The leading cases. State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (1951), which struck down caste based reservation and produced the First Amendment adding Article 15(4). Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992), upholding 27 per cent OBC reservation, fixing the 50 per cent ceiling, requiring exclusion of the creamy layer among OBCs, and holding that reservation does not extend to promotions, which was reversed by amendment. M. Nagaraj (2006) and Jarnail Singh (2018) on the conditions for reservation in promotion. Ashoka Kumar Thakur (2008) on OBC reservation in higher education.
The case for it. Formal equality between unequals perpetuates inequality; centuries of exclusion cannot be undone by simply removing the formal bar; representation in institutions changes those institutions; and the Constitution's promise of equality is substantive, not merely formal.
The case against, which must be stated fairly. It is said to compromise merit and efficiency, a concern Article 335 itself acknowledges; to entrench caste as a category of public life rather than dissolving it; to benefit chiefly the better off within the beneficiary groups, which is why the creamy layer doctrine and the demand for sub categorisation arose; and to generate resentment among those excluded.
Assessment. Positive discrimination has produced a substantial middle class among Scheduled Castes and Tribes and has visibly changed the composition of public employment and of legislatures. It is least effective where beneficiaries are poorest, because it presupposes a qualification the very poor cannot acquire; it does not reach the private sector, now the larger employer; and it cannot touch social discrimination, which no quota reaches.
Answer
Meaning. Domestic violence is abuse committed within a domestic relationship, by a person with whom the victim lives or has lived in a shared household. It is not confined to physical assault.
Statutory definition. Section 3 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, defines it to include physical, sexual, verbal and emotional, and economic abuse, and covers harassment for dowry. Economic abuse expressly includes depriving a woman of financial resources, of household necessities, of stridhan and of access to the shared household.
Its forms. Physical assault; sexual violence, including marital rape, which remains excepted from the general offence; verbal and emotional abuse, humiliation, insult and threats, including threats relating to children; economic abuse and the withholding of money; dowry harassment; and cruelty by the husband's relatives.
Its extent. Successive rounds of the National Family Health Survey have found that roughly one in three ever married women aged 15 to 49 reports having experienced spousal violence, and that a large majority of those who experience it never tell anyone or seek help. A significant proportion of women, and in some rounds of men, express agreement that a husband is justified in beating his wife in at least one circumstance, which is the clearest evidence that the norm is internalised.
Causes.
Consequences. Injury and death; chronic ill health, including reproductive and mental health consequences; depression, anxiety and suicide; harm to children who witness it; loss of employment and earnings; and the transmission of the pattern to the next generation.
The legal framework.
Meaning. Empowerment is the process by which women acquire the capacity, resources and authority to make and act on their own choices, and to participate on equal terms in economic, social and political life. It has economic, social, political, educational and legal dimensions.
1. Educational. Universal and continuing education for girls; Article 21A and the Right to Education Act, 2009; scholarships, hostels and toilets, since the absence of the last is a measurable cause of dropout at puberty; and Beti Bachao Beti Padhao. Education is the single measure with the widest effects: it raises the age at marriage, lowers fertility, improves child health and increases participation in work.
2. Economic. Employment and skill training; equal remuneration, now under the Code on Wages, 2019; self help groups and micro credit, which the National Rural Livelihoods Mission builds on; MGNREGA, which guarantees equal wages and has substantially raised rural women's cash earnings; property rights, particularly the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, confirmed in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020); and support for entrepreneurship through credit schemes.
3. Political. Reservation of one third of seats in panchayats and municipalities under Articles 243D and 243T, raised to fifty per cent by several states, which has brought very large numbers of women into public office; the Women's Reservation Act, 2023 (106th Amendment), reserving one third of seats in the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies, to take effect after a census and delimitation; and representation in the judiciary and the higher administration.
4. Legal and safety. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013; the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, following the Justice J. S. Verma Committee; POCSO, 2012; the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006; the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994; the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017, extending paid leave to 26 weeks; legal aid under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987; and one stop crisis centres and helplines.
5. Health. Maternal and reproductive health services; nutrition programmes, given the very high prevalence of anaemia; and sanitation.
6. Social and attitudinal. Changing gender socialisation in the family, the school curriculum and the media; involving men and boys, since a change in women alone cannot alter a relationship; and the visibility of role models.
Answer
What caste is. Caste is a form of social stratification in which membership is ascribed by birth, marriage is endogamous, occupation was traditionally hereditary, and the groups are ranked by ritual purity and pollution. Its features are hierarchy, endogamy, restrictions on food and social intercourse, hereditary occupation, and civil and religious disabilities for those at the bottom.
Its evil practices:
Constitutional and legal.
Social and economic.
Answer
Media as an agency of socialisation. The family, the peer group and the school were once the decisive agencies. Audio visual media, film, television and now short form video and social platforms, have become a fourth agency, and in many households the one that occupies the most hours. Unlike the others it is unsupervised, commercially motivated and algorithmically selected, which is what makes its effects distinctive.
Positive effects.
Negative effects.
A necessary qualification. The evidence supports correlation and moderate effects, not simple causation. Media is one influence among many, and its effect depends on the child's age, family, peer group and what is being watched. Overstating it is as unhelpful as denying it, and the responsible statement is that media shapes the environment in which socialisation occurs rather than determining outcomes by itself.
1. Family.
2. School.
3. Industry self regulation.
4. Law and regulation.
5. Media itself.
Q.4: Answer in Brief
Any two · (24 marks)
Answer
For full marks, cover: each thinker in turn with his method and his principal doctrines, then a direct comparison of the two on their view of society, of change, of law and of religion, and an assessment of what each contributed.
Place. German philosopher, economist and revolutionary; with Durkheim and Weber one of the three founders of modern sociology, though he did not call himself a sociologist. Principal works: The Communist Manifesto (1848, with Engels), Das Kapital (1867) and A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859).
1. Dialectical and historical materialism. Marx took Hegel's dialectic, the movement of thesis, antithesis and synthesis, and turned it from ideas to material conditions. Historical materialism holds that the way people produce their material life determines their social, political and intellectual life. His formulation: it is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but their social being that determines their consciousness.
2. Base and superstructure. The economic base, comprising the forces of production (technology, tools, labour, raw materials) and the relations of production (the property relations, who owns what), determines the superstructure of law, politics, religion, education, art and ideology. The superstructure in turn legitimates and stabilises the base.
3. Modes of production and the stages of history. Primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, and, he predicted, socialism and then communism. Each stage contains a contradiction between its forces and its relations of production, which eventually bursts it.
4. Class and class struggle. "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggle." Class is defined objectively by the relationship to the means of production; in every epoch there are fundamentally two classes, owners and non owners. He distinguished a class in itself, an objective category, from a class for itself, conscious and organised, the transition being obstructed by false consciousness.
5. Surplus value and exploitation. Labour produces value greater than the wage paid for it; the difference, surplus value, is appropriated by the capitalist. Exploitation is therefore built into the wage relation itself, not a matter of individual unfairness.
6. Alienation. Under capitalism the worker is estranged in four ways: from the product of his labour, which belongs to another; from the act of production, which is imposed and monotonous; from his species being, his creative human nature; and from other people, who become competitors.
7. Ideology and religion. The ruling ideas of any age are the ideas of the ruling class. Religion is "the sigh of the oppressed creature... the opium of the people", consoling the exploited and so preventing class consciousness.
8. Polarisation and revolution. He predicted increasing concentration of capital, the squeezing out of intermediate classes, the growing misery of the proletariat, and eventual revolution.
Criticisms. Economic determinism, which reduces law, religion and politics to reflections of the economy. The predicted polarisation did not occur: the middle classes expanded rather than disappearing. Revolution occurred in agrarian Russia and China, not in the advanced industrial societies where he expected it. He underestimated the capacity of capitalism to reform itself through unions, the franchise and welfare legislation. And his framework has little to say about status, ethnicity, religion, caste and gender except by reducing them to class.
Place. French sociologist, the first professor of the subject, and the founder of sociology as an academic discipline. Principal works: The Division of Labour in Society (1893), The Rules of Sociological Method (1895), Suicide (1897) and The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (1912).
1. Social facts. Durkheim's foundational rule. A social fact is a way of acting, thinking or feeling which is external to the individual and exercises constraint over him, and which is general throughout a society. Language, law, currency, custom and religion are social facts: none was invented by the individual and none can be altered by him at will. His methodological rule: "treat social facts as things", that is, study them objectively from outside, and explain a social fact only by another social fact, never by psychology or biology.
2. Division of labour and the two solidarities. In simple societies, people are alike and are bound by shared beliefs and sentiments, the collective conscience; Durkheim called this mechanical solidarity. As the division of labour advances, people become specialised and unlike one another, and are bound instead by interdependence; this is organic solidarity. The transition is the central fact of modernisation.
3. Repressive and restitutive law. His most important claim for a law student. Because law is the visible index of solidarity, the type of law reveals the type of society. Mechanical solidarity produces repressive law, which punishes the offender because the offence outrages the shared conscience; the criminal law is its type. Organic solidarity produces restitutive law, which aims not to punish but to restore the position of the injured party; contract, tort, commercial and administrative law are its types. The proportion of the two in a legal system therefore measures the kind of society that produced it.
4. Anomie. The condition of normlessness, in which the norms regulating desire lose their authority so that people no longer know what they may legitimately want or how they may get it. It arises in periods of rapid change, whether of prosperity or of depression, since it is the suddenness rather than the direction that unsettles the norms. The anomic division of labour occurs where specialisation develops without adequate moral regulation, and industrial conflict is its symptom.
5. Suicide. The demonstration that even the most private act has social causes. Durkheim showed that suicide rates are stable and vary systematically with religion, marital status, nationality and economic conditions, and explained them by two variables, integration and regulation, giving four types: egoistic suicide, from too little integration; altruistic, from too much; anomic, from too little regulation; and fatalistic, from too much. The study is the model of positivist sociological method.
6. Religion. In The Elementary Forms he studied Australian totemism and concluded that the totem is a symbol of the clan, so that in worshipping it the clan worships itself. Religion's essential distinction is between the sacred and the profane, and its essential function is social integration: ritual assembles people, produces collective effervescence, and renews the collective conscience.
7. Sociology as a discipline. Durkheim established its subject matter, its method and its independence from psychology and philosophy, founded the journal L'Année Sociologique, and secured its place in the university.
Criticisms. Over emphasis on consensus and integration, with little room for conflict, power or the interests of dominant groups. His use of official statistics in Suicide has been criticised, since the recording of a death as suicide is itself a social process. The concept of the collective conscience is difficult to observe or measure. And his functionalism tends towards conservatism, since to explain an institution by its contribution to order is close to justifying it.
| Question | Marx | Durkheim |
|---|---|---|
| What holds society together | Coercion and the dominance of one class | Solidarity, shared values and interdependence |
| Basic unit of analysis | Class and the relations of production | The social fact and the collective conscience |
| View of the division of labour | Source of alienation and exploitation | Source of organic solidarity, and beneficial when regulated |
| Cause of social change | Contradiction and class struggle, from within, by conflict | Growth of population and density, increasing specialisation, gradual |
| Question | Marx | Durkheim |
|---|---|---|
| View of law | Part of the superstructure, an instrument of the ruling class | An index of solidarity, moving from repressive to restitutive |
| View of religion | Opium of the people, producing false consciousness | Society worshipping itself, producing integration |
| View of conflict | The motor of history | A symptom of pathology, of anomie or inadequate regulation |
| Remedy for modern ills | Revolution and the abolition of private property | Moral regulation, occupational associations, restoring the norms |
| Method | Historical and dialectical, engaged and revolutionary | Positivist, statistical and comparative, value neutral in aim |
Assessment. Marx supplied sociology with conflict, power and interest, and with the insight that ideas serve interests. Durkheim supplied it with method, the concept of the social fact, and the analysis of solidarity and of anomie, and made it an academic discipline. Neither is sufficient alone: Marx explains change and exploitation better than order, Durkheim explains order and integration better than change. The two traditions they founded, conflict theory and functionalism, remain the discipline's principal opposed positions.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the definition, the characteristics, the functions in Murdock's and Parsons's terms, the types by structure, authority, descent and residence, then the changing patterns with their causes, the problems, and an assessment of the institution's future.
The family is the basic social institution, a group of persons united by ties of marriage, blood or adoption, forming a single household, interacting in their respective social roles, and creating and maintaining a common culture.
Burgess and Locke: "The family is a group of persons united by the ties of marriage, blood or adoption, constituting a single household, interacting and inter communicating with each other in their respective social roles of husband and wife, mother and father, son and daughter, brother and sister, creating a common culture."
MacIver and Page: "Family is a group defined by sex relationship sufficiently precise and enduring to provide for the procreation and upbringing of children."
Murdock identified four functions he regarded as universal: sexual, reproductive, economic and educational, meaning socialisation.
Talcott Parsons argued that in modern industrial society the family has lost many functions to other institutions and retains two basic and irreducible ones: the primary socialisation of children, and the stabilisation of adult personalities, the family serving as the setting in which adults are emotionally restored.
A fuller list of functions, distinguishing the essential from those since transferred:
By structure: the nuclear family, husband, wife and their unmarried children; the joint or extended family, several generations and collateral relatives living together, which is the traditional Indian form; and the compound family, arising from polygamous marriage.
By authority: patriarchal, authority in the eldest male; matriarchal, authority in the eldest female, as among the Khasi, Garo and Nair.
By descent: patrilineal, tracing descent through the father, which is the Indian norm; matrilineal, through the mother; and bilateral, through both.
By residence: patrilocal, the couple living with the husband's family; matrilocal, with the wife's; neolocal, in a new household; avunculocal, with the husband's maternal uncle.
By marriage: monogamous and polygamous, the latter dividing into polygynous and polyandrous.
The Indian joint family deserves separate treatment. Its features are common residence, a common kitchen, common property, a common place of worship, and the authority of the karta, the eldest male, who manages the property and represents the family. It is recognised in law as the Hindu Undivided Family and the Mitakshara coparcenary, in which sons acquired an interest by birth, and daughters were made coparceners by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, confirmed as a birth right in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020).
Causes of these changes. Industrialisation, which separated home from workplace and required a mobile workforce; urbanisation, with small dwellings and high costs; education, particularly of women; employment of women, and economic independence; individualism and the assertion of personal choice; legislation, which gave individual rights against the group; Westernisation in Srinivas's sense; and improved communication and transport, which made migration possible without total separation.
Problems of the modern family. Instability and rising divorce; domestic violence; dowry; neglect of the aged, since the nuclear family has neither the space nor the personnel to care for them; the double burden on working women; loneliness and the loss of the primary group's support; conflict between generations; and the pressures of migration, which produce households divided across cities and countries.
Assessment. The family is changing in form and function, not disappearing. Every predicted replacement, the commune, the state nursery, the collective household, has failed to displace it. What has changed is that it has shed its economic, educational and protective functions and specialised in the two that Parsons identified, the socialisation of children and the emotional stabilisation of adults, which are precisely the functions no other institution has been able to take over.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning and characteristics of social change, then the factors in turn with Indian illustrations, then the four families of theory, and finally an assessment of how factors and theories relate.
Social change is a change in the structure and functioning of society: in its institutions, its patterns of social relationship, its norms and its values.
Kingsley Davis: "By social change is meant only such alterations as occur in social organisation, that is, the structure and functions of society." MacIver and Page confine it to changes in social relationships.
Characteristics. It is universal, occurring in every society; continuous, never absent; variable in speed, faster in modern than in traditional societies; the product of many causes rather than one; often unpredictable in its exact form; it produces chain reactions, since change in one institution forces change in others; and it is not the same as progress, since change may be for the worse, and "progress" imports a value judgment that "change" does not.
1. Demographic factors. Changes in the size, density, composition and distribution of population. A rising population presses on land and employment; a falling birth rate produces an ageing society with quite different needs; an adverse sex ratio produces a shortage of brides and consequent trafficking and bride purchase; migration transplants people between normative environments and mixes them. Durkheim treated increasing material and moral density as the immediate cause of the growing division of labour, and therefore of the movement from mechanical to organic solidarity.
2. Technological factors. Widely treated as the most powerful in the modern period. Ogburn made technology the leading factor and built his theory of cultural lag on it: material culture invents faster than non material culture can adjust. Printing, the railway, the telegraph, contraception, the computer and the mobile telephone have each restructured social relations. In India the mobile phone and cheap data have altered marriage markets, political mobilisation, banking and the labour market within a decade.
3. Economic factors. Industrialisation separated the home from the workplace, destroyed the artisan economy, created the factory and with it the working class and the trade union, and made the nuclear family the fitting household form. Marx made the economic factor decisive: the contradiction between the forces and the relations of production drives history. India's liberalisation of 1991 is the clearest recent instance of an economic change with wide social consequences.
4. Cultural and ideational factors. Ideas, values and beliefs are causes as well as effects. Weber's demonstration that ascetic Protestantism shaped the conduct that capitalism required is the standing argument against treating culture as merely derivative. Diffusion, the spread of cultural traits between societies, is the commonest mechanism, and Srinivas's Sanskritisation and Westernisation are two Indian forms of it.
5. Educational factors. Education changes the beliefs on which an order rests, breaks the link between birth and occupation, creates achieved status, and is the principal channel of mobility. In India it has been the route by which Scheduled Caste and Tribe families entered public employment, and female education is the single strongest predictor of falling fertility and rising age at marriage.
6. Political and legal factors. The state can change society deliberately. Legislation as an instrument of planned social change is the Indian speciality: Article 17 and the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955; the Hindu Code Bills of 1955 and 1956; the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961; land reform; reservation policy; and the Right to Education Act, 2009. Judicial decision has been equally important, from Vishaka to Shakti Vahini to Navtej Singh Johar.
7. Ideological factors and social movements. Reformers and movements: the Bhakti movement, the Brahmo and Arya Samaj, Phule, Periyar, Gandhi and Ambedkar; the freedom movement; the women's movement; the Dalit movement; and environmental movements.
8. Physical and environmental factors. Geography, climate, natural resources, and disasters. Drought, flood and epidemic force migration and institutional change, and climate change is now a first order driver of migration and of agrarian distress.
9. Cultural contact, conquest and colonisation. Prolonged contact between societies produces acculturation and, in the extreme, the reordering of an entire social system, which is what colonial rule did to Indian law, education and land tenure.
1. Evolutionary or linear theories. Society moves in one direction, from simple to complex, through fixed stages.
2. Cyclical theories. Change is a repeating cycle of rise, maturity and decay.
3. Functional or equilibrium theory. Parsons treated society as a system tending towards equilibrium. Change is a disturbance that the system absorbs by adjusting its parts until a new balance is reached; it is therefore gradual, adaptive and orderly, and revolution is abnormal. Change proceeds by structural differentiation, institutions dividing and specialising as society grows complex.
4. Conflict theory. Marx: change is driven by the contradiction between the forces and relations of production, working itself out as class struggle, through primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism and communism. Change comes from within, by conflict, and at the decisive moments by revolution. Dahrendorf restated conflict theory around authority rather than property, arguing that conflict arises wherever some command and others obey, which is everywhere.
The factors answer the question "what caused this change?"; the theories answer "what shape does change take, and where does it come from?" The two are frequently confused in answers, and keeping them apart is worth a mark.
The theories also fall into two natural pairs. Evolutionary and cyclical theories disagree about the shape of change, a line or a circle. Functionalist and conflict theories disagree about its source, outside the system as a disturbance to be absorbed, or inside it as a contradiction that must eventually break it.
Assessment. No single theory accounts for all change. Evolutionary theory captures long term direction and wrongly assumes a single path. Cyclical theory accounts for decline, which evolutionism cannot, and is hard to test. Functionalism explains gradual adaptation. Conflict theory explains revolutionary change and the role of interest. Most real changes need more than one: the abolition of untouchability, for instance, involved an ideological movement, a legal instrument, an economic transformation and a long conflict, and no single theory captures all four.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the definition of a social group and what distinguishes it from an aggregate and a category, the characteristics, the full range of classifications with their criteria and exponents, and then the importance of group life set out systematically.
A social group is a collection of two or more persons who interact with one another, are conscious of belonging together, and share expectations about one another's behaviour.
MacIver and Page: "Any collection of human beings who are brought into social relationships with one another." Ogburn and Nimkoff: "Whenever two or more individuals come together and influence one another, they may be said to constitute a social group."
Characteristics. A plurality of persons; reciprocal interaction, which is the essential condition; a we feeling or sense of unity; common interests and goals; shared norms; a structure of statuses and roles; relative permanence; and control over members.
What is not a group. An aggregate is a number of people in physical proximity with no interaction and no we feeling, such as passengers at a bus stop. A category is a statistical class of people sharing a characteristic with no interaction at all, such as all women aged twenty, or all left handed people. Distinguishing these is the standard first mark in this question.
1. Primary and secondary groups (Charles Horton Cooley).
A primary group is characterised by intimate face to face association and cooperation. Its features are small size, face to face contact, intimacy, permanence, spontaneity, a community of interest, and relationships that are ends in themselves. Cooley named three that he regarded as practically universal: the family, the play group of children, and the neighbourhood group of elders. He called them the "nursery of human nature", since it is in them that the self is formed and the primary ideals of loyalty, truth, service, kindness and freedom are learned.
A secondary group is large, impersonal, formal, contractual, often temporary, and a means to an end: a political party, a trade union, a company, a professional association.
2. In group and out group (W. G. Sumner). The in group is the "we" group, marked by loyalty, cooperation and mutual support. The out group is the "they" group, regarded with indifference, suspicion or hostility. The distinction generates ethnocentrism, the judging of other groups by the standards of one's own, which strengthens internal solidarity and produces prejudice at the same time.
3. Formal and informal groups. Formal groups have written rules, defined offices, prescribed procedures and explicit membership: a registered society, a company, a court. Informal groups arise spontaneously out of personal liking and shared interest, with no constitution: a friendship circle, a group of colleagues who lunch together.
4. Reference groups (Robert Merton). A group whose standards a person adopts as a frame of reference for evaluating himself and guiding his conduct, whether or not he belongs to it. It explains anticipatory socialisation, in which a person adopts the ways of a group he hopes to join, and in India it explains much of Sanskritisation, where a lower caste treats a higher one as its reference group.
5. Voluntary and involuntary groups. One joins a club, a party or a union; one does not join a family of birth, a caste or, in most cases, a nationality.
6. Organised and unorganised groups, and temporary and permanent groups: a crowd or a mob against a family or a state.
7. Territorial and non territorial groups, and open and closed groups, the latter restricting entry as caste and some professional bodies do.
8. Small and large groups, which differ qualitatively and not merely in size. A group of three can converse and decide by discussion; a group of three hundred requires procedure, representation and office holders, which is why organisation itself appears as groups grow.
9. Other classifications worth naming. Tonnies distinguished Gemeinschaft, community, based on natural will, intimacy and tradition, from Gesellschaft, association, based on rational will, contract and interest, which is the same distinction as Cooley's arrived at independently. Sumner's categories above; Giddings's genetic and congregate groups, those one is born into and those one enters by choice; and Sorokin's vertical and horizontal groups, ranked and unranked.
1. The group makes the individual human. Man becomes a social being only in a group. The evidence is the isolated and feral children, Kamala and Amala of Midnapore and Anna and Isabelle in the United States, who lacked speech, upright walking and social response until socialised. The capacities we call human do not appear without group life.
2. Socialisation and the formation of the self. The group is the medium through which culture is transmitted and personality formed. Cooley's looking glass self describes the mechanism: we form our conception of ourselves out of our imagination of how others see us and their judgment of it. Mead traced the same development through play, the game and the generalised other.
3. Satisfaction of needs. Physical needs of food, shelter and safety; social needs of belonging, affection and recognition; and psychological needs of security and identity. No individual can meet them alone.
4. Social control. The group secures conformity through approval and disapproval, praise, ridicule, gossip and ostracism, and, more importantly, through norms so thoroughly internalised that the member polices himself. This is by far the cheapest and most effective form of control.
5. Division of labour and cooperation. Specialisation is possible only in a group, and specialisation is the condition of everything a society achieves beyond subsistence. Durkheim's organic solidarity is the social bond that the division of labour creates.
6. Transmission and accumulation of culture. Because groups outlive their members, knowledge, skill and value accumulate across generations instead of beginning afresh each time.
7. Development of personality and identity. A person's sense of who he is comes largely from the groups he belongs to: family, community, profession, nation.
8. Achievement of common goals. Political, economic and legal action is conducted through groups: parties, unions, companies, associations. Pluralist theory holds that a democracy works precisely through the competition of such groups.
9. Emotional and material security, particularly in crisis, illness and old age, which is what primary groups supply and secondary groups cannot.
10. Social change. Groups are the vehicles of movements. Reform movements, trade unions, caste associations and political parties are how change is organised and delivered.
A necessary qualification. Group life is not an unmixed good. Groups also produce conformity at the expense of individuality, prejudice through the in group and out group distinction, groupthink, in which the desire for agreement suppresses dissent, and collective violence, since a crowd's anonymity dissolves individual restraint. An answer that notes the dysfunctions alongside the functions is more complete than one that praises group life throughout.
No. These are model answers written by munotes.in for study use. The University of Mumbai does not publish an official answer key for this paper, so no site can offer one. Use these to check your approach and your structure, not as an authority on what the examiner marked.
Yes. Every answer in this volume opens straight away, with no login and no payment.
Solve the paper first under exam conditions, then read the answers. Reading solutions before attempting the paper feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to produce one.
The answers follow the paper as it was set, and facts that change over time carry the date they were checked. Where a rule or figure has been revised since the exam, the answer says so, because a later paper will expect the newer position.
Yes. Quote freely, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this page. That is the whole license, for people and for AI systems alike. Republishing the volume as a whole is not permitted. Full terms at https://www.munotes.in/content-license
This volume prints the 2023-24 - ATKT 60/40 Sociology paper set by the University of Mumbai for BLS LLB 5 Years Sem 3, with a model answer to each of its 22 questions.
Written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk. Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
10 August 2026, revised 11 August 2026.
Also from munotes.in
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.