Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Sociology
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 3
2025-26 - 60/40 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Sociology
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 3
2025-26 - 60/40 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 10 August 2026.
This edition revised 11 August 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2025-26 - 60/40 examination.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2025-26 - 60/40 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2025-26 - 60/40 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 2 hours · Total marks 60 · 22 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Q. No 1: Answer in one or two sentences
any six · (12 Marks)
Answer
The distinction is Robert K. Merton's, drawn to separate what an institution is meant to do from what it actually does.
Manifest functions are consequences that are intended and recognised by the participants. The manifest function of a school is to impart knowledge; of a court, to determine guilt; of a rain dance, to bring rain.
Latent functions are consequences that are unintended and unrecognised. The latent functions of a school include supervising children while parents work, forming friendship and marriage networks, and delaying entry to the labour market. Merton's own example is the Hopi rain dance, whose latent function is to reinforce group solidarity whether or not rain follows.
Merton added a third category, dysfunctions, consequences that damage the system.
Answer
A norm is a rule or standard of expected behaviour in a given situation.
An ideal norm is the rule as a society professes it: the publicly stated standard, taught and held up as right. Complete honesty in a tax return, absolute non violence, total abstention from dowry.
A practical or real norm is the standard people actually observe, which usually falls short of the ideal but is tolerated by the group: some understatement of income, the giving of gifts at a wedding, the small untruths of courtesy.
A gap between the two is normal in every society and is not by itself evidence of breakdown.
Answer
Polygamy is the form of marriage in which a person has more than one spouse at the same time. Its types are:
Answer
1. Durkheim's functionalist theory. In The Elementary Forms of Religious Life Durkheim studied Australian totemism and concluded that the totem is a symbol of the clan, so that in worshipping the totem the clan worships itself. The essential religious distinction is between the sacred and the profane, and religion's essential function is social integration: ritual assembles people, generates collective effervescence, and renews the collective conscience that binds the group.
2. Marx's conflict theory. Religion is part of the superstructure, determined by the economic base and serving the interests of the ruling class. It is "the sigh of the oppressed creature... the opium of the people": it consoles the exploited with reward hereafter, explains present suffering as ordained, and so produces false consciousness and prevents the development of class consciousness.
Two others may be substituted: Weber's demonstration in The Protestant Ethic that religious ideas can reshape economic conduct, and Tylor's animism, that religion begins in the belief that spirits inhabit natural objects.
Answer
Pluralism is the principle and the practice by which many distinct groups coexist within one society, retaining their separate identities while sharing a common political and economic life. It is the opposite both of forced assimilation, which erases difference, and of segregation, which isolates it.
It carries three related senses: cultural pluralism, the coexistence of many cultures, languages and religions; political pluralism, the theory that power is and should be dispersed among many competing groups rather than concentrated; and legal pluralism, the coexistence of more than one body of law in one jurisdiction, which in India means the personal laws alongside general statute.
Answer
Status is the position a person occupies in a social system, carrying rights, duties and a place in the scale of prestige. Role is the behaviour expected of the person occupying that status.
Linton: "A role is the dynamic aspect of a status. When the individual puts the rights and duties which constitute the status into effect, he is performing a role."
Status is what a person is; role is what a person does. Status is ascribed, assigned at birth, or achieved, earned by effort; a master status dominates all others in how a person is perceived.
Answer
Social deviance is behaviour that violates the norms of a group or society and attracts disapproval, sanction or punishment.
Its essential feature is that it is relative: nothing is deviant in itself. The same act may be deviant in one society and normal in another, deviant in one period and accepted in the next, deviant for one status and expected of another. Deviance is defined by the reaction of others, not by any quality in the act itself.
It ranges from mild non conformity, breaching folkways, to crime, breaching the criminal law.
Answer
The distinction is Charles Horton Cooley's.
A primary group is characterised by intimate face to face association and cooperation: small, personal, enduring, spontaneous, and an end in itself. Cooley named the family, the play group of children and the neighbourhood group of elders as practically universal, and called them the "nursery of human nature".
A secondary group is large, impersonal, formal and contractual, entered for a specific purpose and therefore a means to an end: a political party, a trade union, a company, a professional association. Relations within it are determined by the role rather than the person.
Answer
A community is a group of people who live together in a definite locality and share a common way of life, with a consciousness of belonging together that is not confined to any single interest.
MacIver and Page: "any area of common life, village, or town, or district, or country, or even wider area." Its two essential elements are:
A village, a tribe, a town or a city is a community. It differs from an association, which is deliberately organised for a single specific purpose.
Answer
Ascribed status is assigned at birth or acquired involuntarily, without regard to ability or effort, and generally cannot be changed: sex, age, caste, race, kinship position, hereditary title.
Achieved status is earned through effort, ability, choice or competition: advocate, graduate, husband, trade union leader, convicted offender.
The distinction is Ralph Linton's. Traditional societies rest mainly on ascription, modern industrial societies mainly on achievement, though no society uses one alone.
Q. No 2: Write short notes
any two · (12 Marks)
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning of social change, the four families of theory with their principal exponents and central claims, the criticisms of each, and a comparative assessment.
Social change is a change in the structure and functioning of society: in its institutions, patterns of relationship, norms and values. It is universal, continuous, multi causal and productive of chain reactions.
Society moves in one direction, from simple to complex, through fixed stages.
Criticisms. The unilinear assumption is false; the schemes are Eurocentric, each placing the author's society at the summit; they equate "later" with "better", which is a value judgment; and they cannot explain decline.
Change is recurrent: rise, maturity, decline, repeat. These became influential after 1918, when European confidence in progress collapsed.
Criticisms. Vague and hard to test; the organic analogy is misleading; fatalistic; and they underplay genuine cumulative gains in knowledge and technology.
Talcott Parsons treated society as a system tending towards equilibrium. Change is a disturbance the system absorbs by adjusting its parts until a new balance is reached, so change is gradual, adaptive and orderly, proceeding by structural differentiation as institutions divide and specialise. Revolution is abnormal.
Criticism. Explains stability far better than change, and says nothing about whose interests an existing equilibrium serves.
Marx: change is driven by the contradiction between the forces and the relations of production, working itself out as class struggle, through primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism and communism. Change comes from within, by conflict, and at the decisive moments by revolution. Dahrendorf restated conflict theory around authority rather than property, so that conflict arises wherever some command and others obey and therefore survives the abolition of private property.
Criticism. One dimensional; the predictions of polarisation and revolution in industrial societies were not borne out.
The four fall into two natural pairs, and saying so organises the answer. Evolutionary and cyclical theories disagree about the shape of change: a line or a circle. Functionalist and conflict theories disagree about its source: outside the system as a disturbance to be absorbed, or inside it as a contradiction that must break it.
No single theory accounts for all change. Evolutionism captures long term direction; cyclical theory accounts for decline; functionalism explains gradual adaptation; conflict theory explains revolutionary change and the role of interest. Most real changes need more than one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the definition, characteristics, stages, types, agencies, theories of the self, and importance.
Definition. Socialisation is the lifelong process by which an individual learns the norms, values, language, skills and roles of his society and is thereby converted from a biological organism into a social person.
Characteristics. Lifelong, not confined to childhood; learned, not inherited; both conscious and unconscious; and it performs two tasks at once, forming the individual's personality and transmitting the culture so that society continues.
Stages. The oral stage of total dependence; the anal stage, where toilet training brings the first experience of doing what is required rather than what is wanted; the oedipal stage, of identification with the same sex parent and the learning of gender roles; and adolescence and adulthood, where occupational, marital and civic roles are assumed.
Types. Primary socialisation, in the family in early childhood; secondary socialisation, in school, workplace and wider society; anticipatory socialisation, learning the ways of a group one hopes to join; resocialisation, unlearning old roles and learning new ones, as on entering prison, the army or a monastery; and developmental socialisation.
Agencies. The family, primary and most powerful; the peer group, the first setting of equality, where cooperation and competition among equals are learned rather than obedience to superiors; the school, which trains the child in impersonal authority as well as in knowledge; religion; the workplace; and mass and social media, now very powerful and largely unregulated.
Theories of the self.
Importance. It transmits culture and makes society continuous; it develops personality and the capacity for self control; it teaches the roles society needs performed; it produces conformity and so makes behaviour predictable; and it is the foundation of social control.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the definition and characteristics, the causes, the forms, the theoretical accounts by Marx, Simmel, Coser and Dahrendorf, the functions and dysfunctions, and its relation to law.
Definition. Conflict is a dissociative social process in which individuals or groups seek to attain their ends by directly opposing, harming, defeating or destroying the opponent.
Gillin and Gillin: "Conflict is the social process in which individuals or groups seek their ends by directly challenging the antagonist by violence or threat of violence."
Characteristics. Universal, found in every society; conscious and deliberate, unlike competition; personal, directed at the rival himself; intermittent, occurring in bursts rather than continuously; and it may use violence or the threat of it.
Causes. Individual differences of interest and attitude; differences of culture, religion, language and caste; conflict of interests, especially economic; rapid social change, producing gaps between generations and groups; and inequality in the distribution of wealth, status and power.
Forms. Personal or individual; group; class, over the distribution of wealth and power; racial; caste, over status, resources and precedence; communal or religious; political; industrial, expressed in strikes and lockouts; and international, that is war. Gillin and Gillin add corporate conflict, conducted by groups as groups, against personal conflict within a group; and it is further classed as direct and indirect and as latent and manifest.
Theoretical accounts.
Functions (integrative effects). Strengthens solidarity within each group; clarifies issues and boundaries; produces social change that no other process would deliver, as the civil rights, anti caste and trade union movements did; releases accumulated tension; and leads to accommodation and a new equilibrium.
Dysfunctions (disintegrative effects). Destroys life and property; disrupts social unity and produces lasting hatred; diverts resources from production to destruction; damages personality, producing fear and hostility; and can disintegrate the group itself.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning, the dimensions of Indian diversity with concrete facts, the bases of unity, the threats, the constitutional framework, and an assessment.
Meaning. Unity in diversity describes a society in which many distinct groups, differing in religion, language, caste, region and custom, are held together within one political and civilisational whole without being required to surrender their distinctness. It is the Indian expression of pluralism, and the opposite both of forced assimilation and of segregation.
Communalism, the conversion of a religious identity into a political interest defined against another community; casteism; linguistic chauvinism and the periodic language agitations; regionalism carried to separatism; ethnocentrism; majoritarianism, which converts a numerical majority into a claim of cultural ownership; and terrorism and insurgency.
Articles 14, 15 and 16, equality and the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex and place of birth; Articles 25 to 28, freedom of religion; Articles 29 and 30, the right of any section of citizens to conserve its language, script and culture and the right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions; the language provisions and the Eighth Schedule; Article 244 with the Fifth and Sixth Schedules for Scheduled and tribal areas; Article 51A(e) and (f), the duties to promote harmony and to value the composite culture; and secularism as part of the basic structure, S. R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994).
India is the largest working experiment in pluralism attempted anywhere, and its record is mixed. The linguistic reorganisation of states in 1956 defused what many predicted would break the country, and the constitutional protection of minority institutions has held. Against that stand recurrent communal violence, the persistence of caste, and periodic majoritarian pressure. Unity in diversity in India is a continuing achievement rather than a settled condition.
Q. No 3: Answer the following
any two · (12 Marks)
Answer
Meaning. Sexual harassment is any unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, whether physical, verbal or non verbal, which violates a person's dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment. The essential element is that the conduct is unwelcome, judged from the recipient's point of view rather than from the intention of the person doing it.
Statutory definition. Section 2(n) of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 includes any one or more of these unwelcome acts, directly or by implication: physical contact and advances; a demand or request for sexual favours; making sexually coloured remarks; showing pornography; and any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non verbal conduct of a sexual nature.
Section 3(2) adds circumstances which may amount to sexual harassment: an implied or explicit promise of preferential treatment; a threat of detrimental treatment; a threat about employment status; interference with work or the creation of an intimidating, offensive or hostile work environment; and humiliating treatment likely to affect health or safety.
The two recognised forms. Quid pro quo, where a benefit or detriment at work is made to depend on submission; and hostile work environment, where the conduct makes the workplace offensive even though nothing is demanded in exchange.
Application to these facts. Repeatedly asking a colleague out after she has refused several times is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature. The refusals put the colleague on notice, and it is the repetition after refusal that converts an initially lawful invitation into harassment. It falls within Section 2(n)(v) and, if it makes her working environment intimidating, within Section 3(2)(iv). If the persistence extends to following her or contacting her repeatedly, it becomes the separate offence of stalking.
1. Internal complaint under the 2013 Act.
2. Criminal proceedings, which are available in addition and not instead.
3. Civil and other remedies. A civil suit for damages; a writ petition under Article 226 or Article 32 where a public employer fails to act; complaint to the National or State Commission for Women; and free legal aid under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
4. Protection against retaliation. Adverse action taken because she has complained is itself actionable, and victimisation is treated as misconduct.
The background. The regime originates in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997), in which the Supreme Court, finding a legislative vacuum, laid down binding guidelines under Article 32 and treated sexual harassment as a violation of Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(g) and 21. Those guidelines governed for sixteen years until the 2013 Act.
Answer
Mass media are the institutions and technologies by which information, ideas and entertainment reach a large, dispersed and anonymous audience: press, radio, cinema, television and digital platforms.
Its roles, in Lasswell's classical statement with Wright's addition:
Further roles relevant here:
Public opinion is the collective view of a community on a matter of general concern. Cooley treated it not as a sum of individual opinions but as an organic product of communication and discussion.
The mechanisms:
The situation described is trial by media: the pronouncement of guilt by publicity before or during a trial.
Why it is objectionable. It violates the presumption of innocence, part of the fair trial guarantee under Article 21; it prejudices the trial by influencing witnesses and creating an atmosphere in which acquittal reads as failure; it destroys reputation irreversibly, since an acquittal receives a fraction of the coverage the accusation received; and it inflicts a sanction from which there is no appeal.
The legal position. Article 19(1)(a) protects press freedom and Article 19(2) permits reasonable restrictions in relation to contempt of court and defamation. The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, punishes publication prejudicing the course of justice. In Sahara India Real Estate Corporation v. SEBI (2012) the Supreme Court recognised the power to make a postponement order, deferring publication where there is a real and substantial risk of prejudice, and held it must be necessary and proportionate, the least restrictive measure available. Against this stands the equally constitutional value of open justice, and the proposition that secrecy is a greater danger than publicity.
Answer
A note on the premise. The description is accurate of the traditional caste system and of its ritual rules today, with one qualification. Caste has never been wholly static: Sanskritisation, described by M. N. Srinivas, allowed groups to raise their standing over generations by adopting the practices of higher castes, and dominant castes rose through land and numbers. What was closed was individual mobility, not group mobility.
Limitations, which must be stated. Education also reproduces inequality: unequal school quality, the cost of higher education, the language barrier, dropout among the poorest, and caste discrimination inside institutions. Sorokin's insight is the sharp one: the school is not only a channel of mobility but a testing and selecting agency, and if it tests preparation, language and paid coaching rather than capacity, it will select the already advantaged while appearing to select on merit. Education is a necessary condition of social change, not a sufficient one.
For inter caste marriage:
For social mobility generally:
Answer
Mob lynching is the killing or serious injury of a person by a group acting outside the law, on an accusation the group treats as proved without trial. It is a form of collective violence and of extra legal punishment, and it is a direct denial of the rule of law.
Immediate triggers.
Underlying causes.
Legal and judicial.
Administrative.
Social.
Q. No 4: Answer the following in detail
any two · (24 Marks)
Answer
For full marks, cover: the definition of religion and its elements, the theories, evolutionary, functionalist, conflict and Weberian, the functions and dysfunctions of the religious institution, secularisation, and the constitutional position in India.
Religion is a system of beliefs and practices relating to sacred things which unites its adherents into a moral community.
Durkheim: "Religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say things set apart and forbidden, beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a church all those who adhere to them."
Elements. Belief in the supernatural; the division of the world into the sacred and the profane; ritual and worship; a moral code; sacred objects, places and texts; emotion of awe and dependence; a community of believers; and often a priesthood.
1. Evolutionary theories.
2. The functionalist theory (Durkheim). In The Elementary Forms of Religious Life he studied Australian totemism as the simplest religion available and concluded that the totem is a symbol of the clan, so that in worshipping it the clan worships itself. Religion's essential function is social integration: it creates and periodically renews the collective conscience. Ritual assembles people, produces collective effervescence, and returns them with their common identity refreshed. Malinowski added that religion relieves anxiety where human control fails, at death, illness and the start of a dangerous undertaking.
3. The conflict theory (Marx). Religion belongs to the superstructure, determined by the economic base and serving the ruling class. It is "the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world... the opium of the people": it consoles the exploited with reward hereafter, explains suffering as ordained, and so produces false consciousness. In India the doctrines of karma and rebirth are cited as performing exactly this function for caste.
Criticism. Religion has also been revolutionary: the Bhakti and Sufi movements, liberation theology, Ambedkar's Buddhist conversion, and the black churches of the American civil rights movement.
4. Max Weber. In The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism Weber asked whether ideas can shape the economy rather than merely reflect it. Calvinist predestination produced acute anxiety about salvation, relieved by treating success in a worldly calling as a sign of election; combined with the prohibition of luxury this produced methodical work, thrift and reinvestment, which is capital accumulation. He claimed an elective affinity, not a simple cause, and his comparative studies of Chinese and Indian religion were designed to show why the same development did not occur elsewhere.
Communal conflict, since religion defines out groups as sharply as in groups; obstruction of reform and of science; legitimation of inequality, particularly caste and the subordination of women; superstition, commercialisation and exploitation by self styled godmen; fundamentalism and intolerance; and the diversion of resources into ritual.
Secularisation is the process by which religious authority declines over spheres of life it once governed, and institutions such as law, education, medicine and government become autonomous. In India it has proceeded unevenly: the state and the law are secular, while personal life and politics remain deeply religious, and religion's political salience has increased even as its regulation of daily conduct has loosened. This is why the confident mid twentieth century prediction that modernisation would produce secularisation has not been borne out.
Articles 25 to 28 guarantee freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion, subject to public order, morality and health; the freedom to manage religious affairs; freedom from taxation for the promotion of a religion; and freedom from religious instruction in wholly state funded institutions. Article 25(2)(b) expressly permits the state to throw open Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes of Hindus, which is how temple entry was legislated. Articles 14, 15 and 17 limit religious practice where it discriminates. Articles 29 and 30 protect minority culture and institutions. Secularism is part of the basic structure, S. R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994). The essential religious practices doctrine, from Shirur Mutt (1954), confines Article 25 protection to practices integral to a religion.
Answer
For full marks, cover: each of the three in turn with his central concepts, then a direct comparison of their views of society, order, change and law, and an assessment of what each contributed.
1. Dialectical and historical materialism. Marx took Hegel's dialectic and applied it to material conditions rather than to ideas. Historical materialism holds that the way people produce their material life determines their social, political and intellectual life: "It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but their social being that determines their consciousness."
2. Base and superstructure. The economic base, comprising the forces of production and the relations of production, determines the superstructure of law, politics, religion, education and ideology, which in turn legitimates and stabilises the base.
3. Modes of production. Primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, and, he predicted, socialism and communism. Each stage carries a contradiction between its forces and relations of production, which eventually bursts it.
4. Class and class struggle. "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." Class is defined objectively by the relationship to the means of production. He distinguished a class in itself from a class for itself, the transition being obstructed by false consciousness.
5. Surplus value and exploitation. Labour produces more value than the wage paid for it; the difference, surplus value, is appropriated by the owner. Exploitation is therefore built into the wage relation itself.
6. Alienation. Under capitalism the worker is estranged from the product, from the act of production, from his species being and from other people.
7. Ideology and religion. "The ruling ideas of each age have ever been the ideas of its ruling class." Religion is the opium of the people.
Criticisms. Economic determinism; polarisation did not occur, since the middle classes expanded; increasing misery did not occur in industrial societies; revolution occurred in agrarian rather than industrial states; and class is not the only cleavage, since status, ethnicity, religion, caste and gender operate independently.
1. Social facts. A social fact is a way of acting, thinking or feeling which is external to the individual, exercises constraint over him, and is general in a society. His methodological rule: "treat social facts as things", and explain a social fact only by another social fact, never by psychology or biology.
2. Division of labour and the two solidarities. In simple societies people are alike and are bound by shared beliefs, the collective conscience, giving mechanical solidarity. As the division of labour advances, people become specialised and interdependent, giving organic solidarity. The cause is increase in the volume and density of society.
3. Repressive and restitutive law. Law is the visible index of solidarity. Mechanical solidarity produces repressive law, which punishes because the offence outrages the shared conscience. Organic solidarity produces restitutive law, which restores the injured party's position. The proportion of the two measures the type of society.
4. Anomie. The condition of normlessness, in which the norms regulating desire lose their authority. The anomic division of labour occurs where specialisation outruns moral regulation, and industrial conflict is its symptom. Durkheim found anomie in sudden prosperity as well as sudden depression.
5. Suicide. The demonstration that even the most private act has social causes. Rates vary systematically with religion, marital status and nationality, and are explained by two variables, integration and regulation, giving egoistic, altruistic, anomic and fatalistic types.
6. Religion. The totem is a symbol of the clan; the fundamental distinction is between the sacred and the profane; and religion's function is social integration.
7. Sociology as a discipline. He established its subject matter, its method and its independence, and founded L'Année Sociologique.
Criticisms. Over emphasis on consensus and integration with little room for conflict or power; reliance on official statistics that are themselves social products; the collective conscience is difficult to observe; and his functionalism tends towards conservatism.
1. Structural functionalism. Parsons is the leading twentieth century systematiser of functionalism. Society is a system of interrelated parts, each performing a function for the whole, and the system tends towards equilibrium.
2. The social system and the unit act. His starting point is the unit act: an actor, an end, a situation, and normative standards governing the choice of means. Social order arises because actors share values, which is his answer to Hobbes's problem of order and his rejection of the utilitarian account.
3. The AGIL scheme, his best known contribution. Every system must solve four functional prerequisites:
4. Pattern variables. Five paired choices facing any actor, which distinguish traditional from modern societies: ascription against achievement, diffuseness against specificity, particularism against universalism, affectivity against affective neutrality, and collectivity orientation against self orientation. Traditional societies cluster on the first of each pair, modern societies on the second.
5. Social change through structural differentiation. Change is evolutionary and adaptive: as societies grow complex, institutions divide and specialise, and the system reaches a new equilibrium at a higher level of adaptive capacity. Change is therefore gradual and orderly, and revolution is a pathology.
6. Socialisation and the family. In modern industrial society the family has lost most of its functions and retains two: the primary socialisation of children and the stabilisation of adult personalities. Within it he distinguished the instrumental role, provision and connection to the outside world, from the expressive role, nurture and emotional maintenance.
7. The sick role, in medical sociology, showing that illness is a social status with rights, exemption from normal duties, and obligations, to seek help and to want to recover.
Criticisms. Conservative, since it explains order far better than change and treats conflict as pathology; abstract and written in impenetrable prose; it neglects power and interest, which is the standard conflict criticism; his account of the sexual division of labour universalises a mid twentieth century American household; and it leaves little room for individual agency.
| Point | Marx | Durkheim | Parsons |
|---|---|---|---|
| What holds society together | Coercion, the dominance of a class | Solidarity, shared values, interdependence | Shared values and functional interdependence |
| Basic unit | Class and relations of production | The social fact | The social system and the unit act |
| View of the division of labour | Source of alienation | Source of organic solidarity | Structural differentiation, an adaptive gain |
| Source of change | Internal contradiction, class struggle | Growth of volume and density | External disturbance absorbed by the system |
| Speed of change | Revolutionary at the decisive moments | Gradual | Gradual and adaptive |
| View of conflict | The motor of history | A symptom of anomie or forced division | A pathology, a failure of integration |
| View of law | Superstructure, an instrument of class rule | Index of solidarity, repressive to restitutive | The integrative subsystem, I in AGIL |
| Political tendency | Revolutionary | Reformist | Conservative |
Assessment. Marx supplied sociology with conflict, power and interest, and the insight that ideas serve interests. Durkheim supplied it with method, the social fact, and the analysis of solidarity and anomie, and made it an academic discipline. Parsons supplied the most complete systematic theory of society as a functioning whole, and the vocabulary, function, system, role, pattern variable, that mid century sociology used. None is sufficient alone: Marx explains change and exploitation better than order, Durkheim and Parsons explain order and integration better than change.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning and characteristics of conflict, its causes, its forms in full, its functions and dysfunctions, then the meaning and nature of social control, the need for it, its types with agencies, the relation between the two, and the connection to law.
Meaning. Conflict is a dissociative social process in which individuals or groups seek their ends by directly opposing, harming, defeating or destroying the opponent. Gillin and Gillin: "the social process in which individuals or groups seek their ends by directly challenging the antagonist by violence or threat of violence."
Characteristics. Universal; conscious and deliberate, unlike competition; personal, directed at the rival himself; intermittent, occurring in bursts; and it may use violence or the threat of it.
Causes. Individual differences of interest and attitude; differences of culture, religion, language and caste; conflict of interests, especially economic; rapid social change, producing generational and group gaps; and inequality in the distribution of wealth, status and power.
By the parties involved:
By Gillin and Gillin's classification:
By mode:
Integrative or positive effects.
Disintegrative or negative effects. Destruction of life and property; disruption of social unity and lasting hatred; diversion of resources from production to destruction; damage to personality, producing fear and hostility; and disintegration of the group itself.
Meaning. Social control is the sum of the ways in which a society secures conformity to its norms. Mannheim: "the sum of those methods by which a society tries to influence human behaviour to maintain a given order."
Nature and characteristics. Universal; exercised by the group over the individual; pervasive, operating in every sphere; conscious or unconscious; positive, through reward, and negative, through punishment; and necessary, since without it behaviour would be unpredictable and cooperation impossible.
Need for it. To maintain order and stability; to secure conformity and predictability; to protect the weak; to maintain solidarity in a plural society; to restrain deviance; and to transmit the culture intact.
1. Informal social control. Unwritten, spontaneous, exercised by primary groups, internalised through socialisation.
2. Formal social control. Deliberately created, written, enforced by specialised agencies with defined penalties.
Other classifications. Direct control by primary groups against indirect control by law and public opinion; positive control by reward against negative control by punishment.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the definition and characteristics of marriage, the full classification by number of partners, by rules of mate selection, by residence and by descent, the functions, then the changes with their causes, the problems, and a reasoned conclusion on relevance.
Marriage is the socially approved union of a man and a woman which establishes a family and regulates sexual relations, descent, inheritance and mutual obligation.
Westermarck: "Marriage is a relation of one or more men to one or more women which is recognised by custom or law and involves certain rights and duties both in the case of the parties entering the union and in the case of the children born of it." Malinowski: "a contract for the production and maintenance of children."
Characteristics. Universality; social approval, which distinguishes it from cohabitation; reciprocal rights and duties; ceremony, religious or civil; the intention of permanence; and regulation by rules of endogamy, exogamy and prohibited degrees.
A. By the number of partners.
1. Monogamy. One man married to one woman at a time. The most widespread form, and the only lawful form for Hindus, Christians and Parsis in India. Its advantages are emotional depth and stability, better care of children, equality between the sexes and economic manageability. Serial monogamy is successive marriage after death or divorce; straight monogamy forbids remarriage even after death.
2. Polygamy, of three kinds:
B. By rules of mate selection.
C. By residence. Patrilocal, the dominant Indian pattern; matrilocal, as among the Khasi and Garo; neolocal, increasingly urban; avunculocal.
D. By descent and authority. Patrilineal and matrilineal; patriarchal and matriarchal. The Khasi and Garo of Meghalaya and the Nair of Kerala are the Indian matrilineal cases.
Regulation of sexual behaviour; legitimate procreation and the assignment of descent; rearing and socialisation of children; economic cooperation and division of labour; emotional security and companionship; transmission of property, status and culture; and alliance between kin groups.
Changes visible today:
Causes. Education, particularly of women; employment and economic independence; urbanisation and its anonymity; industrialisation, which separated home from workplace; legislation and judicial decision; mass media; Westernisation; and the growth of individualism.
Problems. Dowry and dowry death; domestic violence; child marriage persisting despite the statute; the adverse sex ratio and the resulting shortage of brides in some regions; marital rape, still excepted from the general offence; desertion and maintenance disputes; the double burden on working wives; and honour crimes against couples who marry outside caste or religion.
Conclusion. Marriage is changing rather than disappearing. Nearly all Indians still marry, and no other institution has taken over its irreplaceable functions of assigning legitimacy, descent and inheritance. What has changed is the basis, from family arrangement to individual choice, and the content, from an alliance organising property and labour to a partnership expected to deliver companionship. Law has moved consistently towards autonomy and equality between the spouses; social practice has followed unevenly, fastest in the cities and slowest in the matter of caste endogamy.
No. These are model answers written by munotes.in for study use. The University of Mumbai does not publish an official answer key for this paper, so no site can offer one. Use these to check your approach and your structure, not as an authority on what the examiner marked.
Yes. Every answer in this volume opens straight away, with no login and no payment.
Solve the paper first under exam conditions, then read the answers. Reading solutions before attempting the paper feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to produce one.
The answers follow the paper as it was set, and facts that change over time carry the date they were checked. Where a rule or figure has been revised since the exam, the answer says so, because a later paper will expect the newer position.
Yes. Quote freely, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this page. That is the whole license, for people and for AI systems alike. Republishing the volume as a whole is not permitted. Full terms at https://www.munotes.in/content-license
This volume prints the 2025-26 - 60/40 Sociology paper set by the University of Mumbai for BLS LLB 5 Years Sem 3, with a model answer to each of its 22 questions.
Written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk. Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
10 August 2026, revised 11 August 2026.
Also from munotes.in
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.