munotes®

BLS LLB 5 Years Sem 10 Intellectual Property Laws Oct 2025 - 60/40 Question Paper with Solutions

Mumbai University Solved Question Papers

Intellectual Property Laws

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 10

Oct 2025 - 60/40 Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 24 October 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the Oct 2025 - 60/40 examination.

The answers in this volume state the law as it stands today, not as it stood when the paper was set. The Intellectual Property Appellate Board was abolished on 4 April 2021 by the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, so patent revocation petitions and appeals from the Controller and the Registrar now lie to the High Court, and the Copyright Board's work, including tariff appeals, lies with the Commercial Court. Since 1 August 2024 the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 has turned several trade mark and patent offences into penalties imposed by an adjudicating officer, and the 2026 Act omitted section 119 of the Patents Act from 1 June 2026. Medicines and chemicals have had product patents only since 1 January 2005, and every patent alive on 20 May 2003 runs twenty years from filing. The Supreme Court reversed the Madras ruling in Khoday Distilleries on 27 May 2008. Copyright cases decided before 2012 cite section 52 by its old letters.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii
munotes.in iv

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the Oct 2025 - 60/40 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 2 hours  ·  Total marks 60  ·  22 questions answered

Instructions printed on the paper

  • N.B: 1. All questions are compulsory. 2. Figures to the right indicate full marks.

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in v

Q.1

Q.1: Answer in not more than two sentences

Any six · (12 Marks)

munotes.in 1

(a)Define the term Cinematograph Film as per the Copyright Act.[2]

Answer

Definition. Section 2(f) of the Copyright Act, 1957 says: "'cinematograph film' means any work of visual recording and includes a sound recording accompanying such visual recording and 'cinematograph' shall be construed as including any work produced by any process analogous to cinematography including video films".

What this means.

  1. A visual recording. It is a recording of moving images on any medium, from which they can be seen again (section 2(xxa)).
  2. The soundtrack is part of it. The sound recording that goes with the pictures is included.
  3. Any similar process. Video films, television serials and digital videos are all cinematograph films.

Ownership and term. The author is the producer (section 2(d)(v)). Copyright lasts for sixty years from the year after publication (section 26). The underlying works, such as the script and the music, keep their own copyright.

munotes.in 2

The rights. The owner may make a copy of the film, sell or rent copies, and communicate it to the public (section 14(d)).

Case. In Star India Pvt. Ltd. v. Leo Burnett (India) Pvt. Ltd., 2003 (27) PTC 81 (Bom), Star produced the serial "Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi". A detergent advertisement used characters resembling those in it. The Bombay High Court refused an injunction. It held that copyright in a film is infringed only by making a copy of the film itself. Making another film that merely resembles it is not enough.

munotes.in 3

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest come with the B.L.S. LL.B. 5 Years Semester 10 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Notes + Solved papers: ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in

Or solved papers only: ₹499
Or notes only: ₹499

The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!