munotes®

The Conditional Order: How a Magistrate Abates a Nuisance

Chapter Thirty-Three

Syllabus topic 1, "General Laws on Environmental Concern"

Pages 130 to 134 of 913

In one line

A magistrate can order a nuisance removed in weeks, without a suit, without a fee and on the report of a police officer.

In the wording a student can write in an examination: section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 empowers a District Magistrate, a Sub-divisional Magistrate or any other Executive Magistrate specially empowered by the State Government, on receiving the report of a police officer or other information and on taking such evidence as he thinks fit, to make a conditional order requiring a person to remove an unlawful obstruction or nuisance, to desist from or regulate a trade or occupation injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community, to stop a construction or alter the disposal of a substance likely to occasion conflagration or explosion, to remove repair or support a dangerous building tent structure or tree, to fence a tank well or excavation, or to destroy confine or dispose of a dangerous animal, or to appear and show cause why the order should not be made absolute.

Why this is the most useful provision in the general law

Four reasons.

It is free and quick. No court fee, no plaint, no lawyer required. The magistrate may act on the report of a police officer or on other information, which includes an application by an affected person.

It reaches a trade. Clause (b) empowers the magistrate to prohibit or regulate a trade or occupation that is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community. That is a power to close a factory, exercised by an executive magistrate.

It reaches a public authority. The person against whom the order runs is the person causing the nuisance, and in Ratlam that was a municipality.

It produces abatement, not punishment. Which is what a person living beside a nuisance actually wants.

The six situations in section 152(1)

Clause (a). That any unlawful obstruction or nuisance should be removed from any public place or from any way, river or channel which is or may be lawfully used by the public.

Clause (b). That the conduct of any trade or occupation, or the keeping of any goods or merchandise, is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community, and that in consequence such trade or occupation should be prohibited or regulated or such goods or merchandise removed or their keeping regulated.

Clause (c). That the construction of any building, or the disposal of any substance, as is likely to occasion conflagration or explosion, should be prevented or stopped.

Clause (d). That any building, tent or structure, or any tree, is in such a condition that it is likely to fall and thereby cause injury, and that its removal, repair or support is necessary.

munotes.in130

The Conditional Order: How a Magistrate Abates a Nuisance

Clause (e). That any tank, well or excavation adjacent to a way or public place should be fenced.

Clause (f). That any dangerous animal should be destroyed, confined or otherwise disposed of.

Clauses (a), (b) and (c) are the environmental ones. Clause (b) is the one that matters most, and the word community in it is what makes the power a public one.

The six things the order may require

Corresponding to the six situations, the order may require the person, within a time fixed in the order, to remove the obstruction or nuisance; to desist from or remove or regulate the trade, occupation or goods; to prevent or stop the construction or alter the disposal of the substance; to remove, repair or support the building, tent, structure or tree; to fence the tank, well or excavation; or to destroy, confine or dispose of the animal.

Or, if he objects, to appear before the magistrate at a time and place fixed and show cause why the order should not be made absolute.

Two provisions that decide most disputes

Section 152(2). No order duly made by a Magistrate under this section shall be called in question in any Civil Court. So a person served cannot bring a civil suit to restrain it; his remedy is to show cause in the proceeding itself, and thereafter a revision or a writ.

The Explanation. A public place includes also property belonging to the State, camping grounds and grounds left unoccupied for sanitary or recreative purposes. This brings government land and open spaces inside the section.

The procedure that follows

Section 153. The order shall, if practicable, be served on the person against whom it is made in the manner provided for service of summons; if it cannot be so served it shall be notified by proclamation and a copy stuck up at the fittest place for conveying the information.

Section 154. The person against whom the order is made shall either perform the act within the time and in the manner specified, or appear in accordance with the order and show cause against it, and such appearance or hearing may be permitted through audio-video conferencing. That last clause is new in 2023.

Section 155. If the person does not perform the act or appear and show cause, he is liable to the penalty specified in section 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, and the order shall be made absolute.

Section 223 punishes disobedience of an order duly promulgated by a public servant, and it is the provision that gives the conditional order its force.

The leading case

Facts. In Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Vardhichand, AIR 1980 SC 1622, residents of New Road in Ratlam complained to the Sub-divisional Magistrate that the municipality had not built drains, that filth and effluent from a nearby alcohol plant flowed through the street, and that the ward was in consequence a public nuisance. The magistrate made an order requiring the municipality to draft a plan and construct drains within six months. The High Court affirmed it. The municipality pleaded before the Supreme Court that it had no funds.

munotes.in131

The Conditional Order: How a Magistrate Abates a Nuisance

Held. The order was upheld. A responsible municipal council constituted for the precise purpose of preserving public health cannot escape its principal duty by pleading financial inability. The provision is a tool of social justice for the little Indian and is to be wielded against the polluter. Where directive principles have found statutory expression in a duty, the duty is enforceable. The Court gave the municipality a timetable and directed the State to assist.

Why it matters. It is the leading decision on this power, it established that the power runs against a public authority, and it is the standard illustration of the criminal law achieving what a civil suit could not.

Worked example

A poultry processing shed opens in a residential lane. Blood and offal are washed into the street drain, and the smell is intolerable within fifty metres. Twelve residents write to the Sub-divisional Magistrate.

Which clause? Clause (b), the conduct of a trade injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community.

What must the magistrate do first? Take such evidence as he thinks fit. In practice a police or health department report, and often an inspection.

What does he make? A conditional order under section 152 requiring the shed either to stop or to regulate its operation in a specified manner within a stated time, or to appear and show cause.

What can the shed do? Appear and show cause under section 154, including through audio-video conferencing. It may deny the facts, or contend that the smell does not affect the community.

Can it go to a civil court? No. Section 152(2) bars it.

What if it ignores the order? Under section 155 it becomes liable to the penalty in section 223 of the Nyaya Sanhita and the order is made absolute.

What is the parallel remedy? A complaint to the Pollution Control Board, which can act under the water and air statutes, and an application to the National Green Tribunal. The magistrate is faster; the Board can impose conditions and standards the magistrate cannot.

What it does NOT mean

It does not mean the magistrate decides a title dispute. Where the person denies the existence of a public right, section 156 requires the magistrate to inquire and, if there is reliable evidence supporting the denial, to stay his hand until a competent court decides.

munotes.in132

The Conditional Order: How a Magistrate Abates a Nuisance

It does not mean the order is final when made. It is conditional. It becomes absolute only after the person fails to comply or fails to show cause, or after his cause is heard and rejected.

It does not mean the section punishes. Section 152 abates. The punishment is in section 223 of the Nyaya Sanhita for disobedience, and in sections 292 and 293 for the nuisance itself.

It does not mean any magistrate may act. A District Magistrate, a Sub-divisional Magistrate, or an Executive Magistrate specially empowered by the State Government. A judicial magistrate has no power under this section.

Limits and criticism

It depends on an executive magistrate. The power is discretionary and the officer has a district to run.

It is not designed for a measured standard. The magistrate decides whether a trade is injurious to health or physical comfort, which is a judgment on evidence, and he has no power to fix an emission limit.

Its sanction is weak. Section 223 carries a modest punishment, and repeated disobedience is answered by section 293 of the Nyaya Sanhita rather than by anything stronger.

It has been overtaken. Since 2010 an application to the National Green Tribunal offers a specialist forum with the power to order relief, compensation and restitution, and since 2024 the Board can impose penalties in lakhs administratively. The magistrate's power survives as the fastest and cheapest remedy and no longer as the principal one.

Quick revision

  • Section 152: conditional order for the removal of a nuisance, by a District, Sub-divisional or specially empowered Executive Magistrate.
  • Six situations: obstruction or nuisance, injurious trade, dangerous construction or disposal, dangerous building or tree, unfenced tank or excavation, dangerous animal.
  • Clause (b) is the environmental one and reaches a trade injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community.
  • Section 152(2) bars a civil court; the Explanation brings State property and open grounds within a public place.
  • Sections 153 to 155: service, obey or show cause including by audio-video conferencing, and on default the penalty under section 223 of the Nyaya Sanhita with the order made absolute.
  • Ratlam: want of funds is no answer, and the power runs against a municipality.

Test yourself

1. Who may make an order under section 152, and on what material? A District Magistrate, a Sub-divisional Magistrate, or any other Executive Magistrate specially empowered in that behalf by the State Government. He acts on receiving the report of a police officer or other information, and on taking such evidence, if any, as he thinks fit. A judicial magistrate has no power under the section.

munotes.in133

The Conditional Order: How a Magistrate Abates a Nuisance

2. A person served with a conditional order wants to challenge it. What can he do and what can he not do? He can appear before the magistrate at the time and place fixed and show cause why the order should not be made absolute, and that appearance may be through audio-video conferencing. If he denies the existence of a public right in a way, river, channel or place, the magistrate must inquire and stay his hand if there is reliable evidence supporting the denial. He cannot bring a suit in a civil court, because section 152(2) provides that no order duly made under the section shall be called in question in any Civil Court.

3. What happens if the person neither complies nor appears? Section 155 applies: he becomes liable to the penalty specified in section 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, which punishes disobedience of an order duly promulgated by a public servant, and the conditional order is made absolute. Continuing the nuisance after that injunction is separately punishable under section 293 of the Nyaya Sanhita with simple imprisonment of up to six months.

munotes.in134

The rest of this subject

These notes are cut from the University's printed syllabus. Open the syllabus itself, or the past papers, for the same subject.

Report or request
Done!